SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, S., Huette, S., Matlock, T., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). On the temporal dynamics of negated perceptual simulations. In F.Parrill, V.Tobin, & M.Turner (Eds.), Mind, form, and body (pp. 120). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390412.
  • Barres, P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). On imagining what is true (and what is false). Thinking & Reasoning, 9(1), 142.
  • Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2005). Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron, 45(5), 801814.
  • Dale, R. (2008). The possibility of a pluralist cognitive science. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 20, 155179.
  • Dale, R., Dietrich, E., & Chemero, A. (2009). Explanatory pluralism in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 33, 739742.
  • Dale, R., Duran, N. D., & Roche, J. (2010). The porous cognition-action interface, language processing, and pluralism. In R. K.Mishra & N.Srinivasan (Eds.), Language-cognition interface: State of the art (pp. 115136). Munich, Germany: LINCOM Europa.
  • Dale, R., Kehoe, C., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 1528.
  • Dale, R., Roche, J., Snyder, K., & McCall, R. (2008). Exploring action dynamics as an index of paired-associate learning. PLoS ONE, 3(3), e1728.
  • Duran, N. D., Dale, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). The action dynamics of overcoming the truth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 486491.
  • Farmer, T. A., Anderson, S. E., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Gradiency and visual context in syntactic garden-paths. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 570595.
  • Farmer, T. A., Cargill, S. A., Hindy, N. C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Tracking the continuity of language comprehension: Computer-mouse trajectories suggest parallel syntactic processing. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 889909.
  • Fischler, I., Bloom, P. A., Childers, D. G., Roucos, S. E., & Perry, N. (1983). Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 20(4), 400409. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920
  • Fishbach, A., Roy, S. A., Bastianen, C., Miller, L. E., & Houk, J. C. (2005). Kinematic properties of on-line error corrections in the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 164(4), 442457.
  • Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226241.
  • Freeman, J. B., Ambady, N., Rule, N. O., & Johnson, K. L. (2008). Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 673690.
  • Gardner, H. (2006). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Giora, R. (2006). Is negation unique? On the processes and products of phrasal negation. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 979980.
  • Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2003). The body’s contribution to language. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 93126.
  • Glenberg, A. M., Robertson, D. A., Jansen, J. L., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (1999). Not propositions. Cognitive Systems Research, 1(1), 1933.
  • Hartigan, J. A., & Hartigan, P. M. (1985). The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics, 13(1), 7084.
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Relation between comprehending and remembering some complex sentences. Memory and Cognition, 4, 318322.
  • Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory and Cognition, 29(7), 960967.
  • Kaup, B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 439446.
  • Kaup, B., Zwaan, R. A., & Lüdtke, J. (2007). The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negation represented? In F.Schmalhofer & C. A.Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 255288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2009). Disjunctive illusory inferences and how to eliminate them. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 615623. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.615
  • Magnuson, J. S. (2005). Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(29), 99959996.
  • McKinstry, C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision-making. Psychological Science, 19(1), 2224.
    Direct Link:
  • Niessing, J., & Friedrich, R. W. (2010). Olfactory pattern classification by discrete neuronal network states. Nature, 465(7294), 4752. doi:10.1038/nature08961
  • Nieuwland, M. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle. Psychological Science, 19(12), 12131217.
    Direct Link:
  • Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2009). Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461(7261), 263266.
  • Snow, R., O’Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008). Cheap and fast – but is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. Presented at the Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2008).
  • Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(8), 360366.
  • Sorokin, A., & Forsyth, D. (2008). Utility data annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk (pp. 18). Presented at the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2008. CVPRW ‘08. IEEE Computer Society Conference on. doi: 10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562953
  • Spivey, M. J. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R. (2006). Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 207211.
    Direct Link:
  • Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(29), 1039310398.
  • Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 15211543.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., & Lucas, M. M. (1987). Context effects in lexical processing. Cognition, 25(1–2), 213234.
  • Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 132(3), 331350. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331
  • Walsh, M. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2009). The strategic nature of changing your mind. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 416440.
  • Wason, P. C. (1959). The processing of positive and negative information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(2), 92107.
  • Wason, P. C. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 4(1), 711.
  • Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wason, P. C., & Jones, S. (1963). Negatives: Denotation and connotation. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 54, 299307.
  • Wojnowicz, M., Ferguson, M., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2009). The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 20, 14281435.
    Direct Link:
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162185.