SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alicke, M. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 368378.
  • Alicke, M. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 556574.
  • Bargh, J. A. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462479.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.
  • Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2004). Omission bias, individual differences, and normality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 7485.
  • Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2009). Protected values and omission bias as deontological judgments. In D. M.Bartels, C. W.Bauman, L. J.Skitka, & D.Medin (Eds.), Moral judgment and decision making (Vol. 50, pp. 133167). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J.Barkow, L.Cosmides, & J.Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 163228). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cushman, F. A. (2008a). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108(2), 353380.
  • Cushman, F. A. (2008b). The origins of moral principles. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
  • Cushman, F. A. (in press). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353380.
  • Cushman, F. A., Dreber, A., Wang, Y., & Costa, J. (2009). Accidental outcomes guide punishment in a ‘trembling hand’ game. PLoS ONE, 4(8), e6699. doi: 6610.1371/journal.pone.0006699.
  • Cushman, F. A., & Greene, J. D. (in press). The philosopher in the theater. In M.Mikulincer & P. R.Shaver (Eds.), Social psychology of morality: The origins of good and evil. Washington, DC: APA Press.
  • Cushman, F. A., Knobe, J., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008). Moral appraisals affect doing/allowing judgments. Cognition, 108(1), 281289.
  • Cushman, F. A., Young, L., & Hauser, M. D. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuitions in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 10821089.
    Direct Link:
  • Darley, J. M., & Shultz, T. R. (1990). Moral rules – their content and acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 525556.
  • Dwyer, S. (2004). How good is the linguistic analogy Available at: http://www.umbc.edu/philosophy/dwyer. Accessed February 25, 2004.
  • Fincham, F. D., & Jaspers, J. (1979). Attribution of responsibility to the self and other in children and adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 15891602.
  • Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (1992). Ethics: Problems and principles. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 515.
  • Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart, L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111(3), 364371.
  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389400.
  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 21052108.
  • Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4.
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814834.
  • Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191221.
  • Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613628.
  • Hart, H. L. A., & Honore, T. (1959). Causation in the law. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  • Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed a universal sense right and wrong. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Hauser, M. D., Cushman, F. A., Young, L., Jin, R., & mikhail, J. M. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgment and justification. Mind and Language, 22(1), 121.
  • Hauser, M. D., Young, L., & Cushman, F. A. (2008). Reviving Rawls’ linguistic analogy. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 107143). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
  • Henrich, N., & Henrich, J. (2007). Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 309324.
  • Knobe, J. (2006). The concept of intentional action: A case study in the uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies, 130, 203231.
  • Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F. A., Hauser, M. D., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature, 446, 908911.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development, Volume 1: The philosophy of moral development. New York: Harper Row.
  • Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1517), 819.
  • Loewy, A. H. (2003). Criminal law. St. Paul, MN: Thompson West.
  • Mikahil, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 143152.
  • Mikhail, J. M. (2000). Rawls’ linguistic analogy: A study of the ‘generative grammar’ model of moral theory described by John Rawls in ‘A theory of justice’. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.
  • Nichols, S. (2002). Norms with feeling: Toward a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84, 221236.
  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231259.
  • Piaget, J. (19651932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
  • Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought. New York: Viking.
  • Pizarro, D. A., Uhlmann, E., & Bloom, P. (2003). Causal deviance and the attribution of moral responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 653660.
  • Quinn, W. S. (1989). Actions, intentions, and consequneces: the doctrine of doing and allowing. The Philosophical Review, 145, 287312.
  • Rachels, J. (1975). Active and passive euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine, 292, 7880.
  • Rai, T., & Holyoak, K. (2010). Moral principles or consumer preferences? Alternative framings of the trolley problem. Cognitive Science, 34(2), 311321.
  • Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263277.
  • Ritov, I. I., & Baron, J. (1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(2), 7994.
  • Robinson, P., & Kurzban, R. (2007). Concordance & conflict in intuitions of justice. Minnesota Law Review, 91(6), 18291907.
  • Royzman, E., & Baron, J. (2002). The preference for indirect harm. Social Justice Research, 15(2), 165184.
  • Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 127.
  • Shenhav, A., & Greene, J. (2010). Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron, 67(4), 667677.
  • Shultz, T. R., Schleifer, M., & Altman, I. (1981). Judgments of causation, responsibility, and punishment in cases of harm-doing. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 13(3), 238253.
  • Shultz, T. R., Wright, K., & Schleifer, M. (1986). Assignment of moral responsibility and punishment. Child Development, 57(1), 177184.
  • Sperber, D. (1995). Introduction. In D.Sperber, D.Premack, & A.Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition (pp. xvxx). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  • Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(1), 76105.
  • Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 13951415.
  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 3557.
  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waldmann, M. R., & Dieterich, J. H. (2007). Throwing a bomb on a person versus throwing a person on a bomb: Intervention myopia in moral intuitions. Psychological Science, 18(3), 247253.
    Direct Link:
  • Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780784.
    Direct Link:
  • White, P. A. (1990). Ideas about causation in philosophy and psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 108(1), 318.
  • Young, L., Cushman, F. A., Hauser, M. D., & Saxe, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(20), 82358240.