SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahn, W.-K., & Kalish, C. W. (2000). The role of mechanism belief in causal reasoning. In F. C.Keil & R. A.Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 199225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ahn, W.-K., Kalish, C. W., Gelman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Luhmann, C., Atran, S., Coley, D. J., & Shafto, P. (2001). Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts. Cognition, 82, 5969.
  • Ahn, W.-K., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299352.
  • De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 289310.
  • Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2009). Causal learning with local computations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 678693.
  • Gelman, S. (2003). The essential child. The origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review, 116, 661716.
  • Hirschfeld, L. A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child’s construction of human kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kemp, C., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Learning causal schemata. In D. S.McNamara & J. G.Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 389394). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Kemp, C., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2010). Learning to learn causal models. Cognitive Science, 34, 11851243.
  • Lagnado, D. A., Waldmann, M. R., Hagmayer, Y., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). Beyond covariation. Cues to causal structure. In A.Gopnik & L. E.Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp. 154172). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Lien, Y., & Cheng, P. W. (2000). Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: A coherence hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 87137.
  • Marsh, J., & Ahn, W.-K. (2009). Spontaneous assimilation of continuous values and temporal information in causal induction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 334352.
  • Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960983.
  • Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S.Vosniadou & A.Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179195). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289316.
  • Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rehder, B. (2003a). A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 11411159.
  • Rehder, B. (2003b). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27, 709748.
  • Rehder, B. (2007). Essentialism as a generative theory of classification. In A.Gopnik & L.Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp. 190207). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Rehder, B. (2009). Causal-based property generalization. Cognitive Science, 33, 301343.
  • Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323360.
  • Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2004). Category coherence and category-based property induction. Cognition, 91, 113153.
  • Rehder, B., & Kim, S. (2006). How causal knowledge affects classification: A generative theory of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 659683.
  • Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognition, 26, 521562.
  • Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Medin, D. L. (Eds.) (1996). The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 34: Causal learning. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Tenenbaum, J. B., & Niyogi, S. (2003). Learning causal laws. In R.Alterman & D.Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 11521157). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Waldmann, M. R. (1996). Knowledge-based causal induction. In D. R.Shanks, K. J.Holyoak, & D. L.Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 34: Causal learning (pp. 4788). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Waldmann, M. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 5376.
  • Waldmann, M. R. (2001). Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 600608.
  • Waldmann, M. R., Cheng, P. W., Hagmayer, Y., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2008). Causal learning in rats and humans: A minimal rational model. In N.Chater & M.Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind. Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 453484). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Waldmann, M. R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2006). Categories and causality: The neglected direction. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 2758.
  • Waldmann, M. R., & Hagmayer, Y. (in press). Causal reasoning. In D.Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Waldmann, M. R., Hagmayer, Y., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2006). Beyond the information given: Causal models in learning and reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 307311.
    Direct Link:
  • Waldmann, M. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Fratianne, A. (1995). Causal models and the acquisition of category structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 181206.
  • Waldmann, M. R., Meder, B., von Sydow, M., & Hagmayer, Y. (2010). The tight coupling between category and causal learning. Cognitive Processing, 11, 143158.
  • White, P. A. (2009). Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. Psychological Review, 116, 580601.
  • Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82111.