SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abraham, R. H., & Shaw, C. D. (1992). Dynamics: The geometry of behavior. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Allopenna, P., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye-movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419439.
  • Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247264.
  • Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 502518.
  • Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2009). Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye-movements and mental representation. Cognition, 111, 5571.
  • Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723742.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577660.
  • Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 8491.
  • Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 687696.
  • Crutchfield, J. P., & Young, K. (1990). Computation at the onset of chaos. In W. H.Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information (pp. 223270). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453459.
  • Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179211.
  • Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7, 195224.
  • Fodor, J. D. (1998). Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 136.
  • Gorfein, D. S., Viviani, J. M., & Leddo, J. (1982). Norms as a tool for the study of homography. Memory & Cognition, 10, 503509.
  • Haken, H.. (2004). Synergetic computers and cognition. 2nd enlarged ed. Berlin: Springer.
  • Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic early parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of NAACL (Vol. 2, pp. 159–166, Pittsburg, PA.
  • Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Are there orthographic impairments in phonological dyslexia? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 7192.
  • Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662720.
  • Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, 2332.
  • Jacobs, D., & Michaels, C. F. (2007). Direct learning. Ecological Psychology, 19, 321349.
  • Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434446.
  • Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474516.
  • Kelso, J. A. S., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Fowler, C. A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 812832.
  • Kessler, M. A., & Werner, B. T. (2003). Self-organization of sorted patterned ground. Science, 299, 380383.
  • Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science, 30, 481529.
  • Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2007). The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 519543.
  • Konieczny, L., Müller, D., Hachmann, W., Schwarzkopf, S., & Wolfer, S. (2009). Local syntactic coherence interpretation. Evidence from a visual world study. In N. A.Taatgen & H.van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 11331138). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Koschmieder, E. L. (1993). Bénard cells and Taylor vortices. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
  • Kukona, A., Fang, S., Aicher, K., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition, 119, 2342.
  • Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 11261177.
  • Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 2108621090.
  • Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Dahan, D. (2003). The time course of spoken word recognition and learning: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 202227.
  • Marcus, G. F. (2001). The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mayberry, M. R., Crocker, M. W., & Knoeferle, P. (2009). Learning to attend: A connectionist model of situated language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 33, 794838.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 186.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Kawamoto, A. H. (1986). Mechanisms of sentence processing: Assigning roles to constituents of sentences. In J. L.McClelland & D. E.Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, volume 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 272325). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375407.
  • McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99130.
  • Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 475494.
  • Moody, C. L., & Gennari, S. P. (2010). Effects of implied physical effort in sensory-motor and pre-frontal cortex during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 49, 782793.
  • Nelson, D. L., Mcevoy, C. L., Walling, J. R., & Wheeler, J. W. (1980). The University of South Florida homograph norms. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 1637.
  • Oudeyer, P., Kaplan, F., & Hafner, V. (2007). Intrinsic motivation systems for autonomous mental development. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11, 265286.
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576582.
  • Raczaszek-Leonardi, J., Shapiro, L. P., Tuller, B., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Activating basic category exemplars in sentence contexts: A dynamical account. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 87113.
  • Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245266.
  • Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89104.
  • Roy, D., & Mukherjee, N. (2005). Towards situated speech understanding: Visual context priming of language models. Computer Speech and Language, 19, 227248.
  • Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489537.
  • Simpson, G. B., & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 2839.
  • Simpson, G. B., & Kang, H. (1994). Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. In D.Dagenbach & T. H.Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 359381). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 174.
  • Spivey, M. J. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spivey-Knowlton, M. (1996). Integration of linguistic and visual information: Human data and model simulations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
  • Spivey, M., & Geng, J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65, 235241.
  • Strogatz, S. H. (1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Cambridge, England: Perseus Books.
  • Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645659.
  • Tabor, W. (2000). Fractal encoding of context-free grammars in connectionist networks. Expert Systems: The International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks, 17, 4156.
  • Tabor, W. (2002). The value of symbolic computation. Ecological Psychology, 14, 2151.
  • Tabor, W. (2003). Learning exponential state-growth languages by hill climbing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14, 444446.
  • Tabor, W. (2006). A unified, self-organizing model of garden path phenomena, center-embedding phenomena, and interference effects. Paper presented at the 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
  • Tabor, W.. (2009). Dynamical insight into structure in connectionist models. In J. P.Spencer, M. S. C.Thomas, & J. L.McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development. Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 165181). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. (2004). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 355370.
  • Tabor, W., & Hutchins, S. (2004). Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 431450.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J., & Seidenberg, M. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427440.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Magnuson, J. S., Dahan, D., & Chambers, C. G. (2000). Eye movements and lexical access in spoken language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 557580.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 16321634.
  • Van Dyke, J. A. (2007). Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 407430.
  • Wollen, K. A., Cox, S. D., Coahran, M. M., Shea, D. S., & Kirby, R. F. (1980). Frequency of occurrence and concreteness ratings of homograph meanings. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 815.
  • Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.
  • Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. (2006). Eye movements reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 114.
  • Zhabotinsky, A. M. (1991). A history of chemical oscillations and waves. Chaos, 1, 379386.