SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bohnemeyer, J., & Stolz, C. (2006). Spatial reference in Yukatek Maya: A survey. In S. C.Levinson & D. P.Wilkins (Eds.), The grammar of space (pp. 273310. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 122.
  • Brown, P. (2001). Learning to talk about motion Up and Down in Tzeltal. In M.Bowerman & S. C.Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 512544). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1993). Linguistic and nonlinguistic coding of spatial arrays: Explorations in Mayan cognition. Working Paper No. 24. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Plank Institute.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2000). Frames of spatial reference and their acquisition in Tenejapan Tzeltal. In L.Nucci, G.Saxe, & E.Turiel (Eds.), Culture, thought and development (pp. 167197). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Language as mind tools: Learning how to think through speaking. In J.Guo, E.Lieven, N.Budwig, S.Ervin-Tripp, K.Nakumara, & S.Ozcaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the traditions of Dan Slobin (pp. 451464). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Cienki, A. J., & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub Co.
  • Danziger, E. (1999). Language, space and sociolect: Cognitive correlates of gendered speech in Mopan Maya. In C.Fuchs & S.Robert (Eds.), Language diversity and cognitive representations (pp. 85106). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Dasen, P., & Mishra, R. C. (2010) Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition. An eco-cultural perspective. Cambridge Studies in Cognitive and Perceptual Development (No. 12). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • De León, L. (1994). Exploration in the acquisition of location and trajectory in Tzotzil. Space in Mayan Languages, Special Issue of Linguistics, 4–5(32), 857884.
  • De León, L. (2001). Finding the richest path: Language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil. In M.Bowerman & S. C.Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 544566). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1967). Head and body cues in the judgment of emotion: A reformulation. Perceptual and motor skills, 24(3 PT 1), 711724.
  • Emmorey, K., & Casey, S. (2001). Gesture, thought and spatial language. Gesture, 1, 3550.
  • Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Enfield, N. J., Kita, S., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 17221741.
  • Gaskins, S. (1996). How Mayan parental theories come into play. In S.Harkness & C. M.Super (Eds.), Parent’s cultural belief systems (pp. 345363). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Gaskins, S. (1999). Children’s daily lives in a Mayan village: A case of study of culturally constructed roles and activities. In A.Göngü (Ed.), Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 2559). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. In J.Werker & H. M.Wellman (Eds.), Essays in developmental psychologyseries. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gullberg, M. (2008). Gestures and second language acquisition. In P.Robinson & N.Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 276305). New York: Routledge.
  • Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hanks, W. F. (1984). Sanctification, structure and experience in a Yucatec Maya ritual event. Journal of American Folklore, 97(384), 131166.
  • Hanks, W. F. (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hanks, W. F. (1993). The five gourds of memory. In A.Monod-Becquelin & M.Fioravanti (Eds.), Mémoire de la tradition (pp. 330319). Paris: Société d’Ethnologie.
  • Hanks, W. F. (2000). The five gourds of memory. In W. F.Hanks (Ed.), Intertexts: Writings on language, utterance, and context (pp. 197217). Lanham, England: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • Hanks, W. F. (2005). Explorations in the deictic field. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 191220.
  • Hanks, W. F. (2009). Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(1), 1024.
  • Haviland, J. B. (1993). Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimidhirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1), 345.
  • Haviland, J. B. (1998). Guugu Yimithirr cardinal directions. Ethos, 26(1), 2547.
  • Haviland, J. B. (2000a). Early pointing gestures in Zinacantán. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(2), 162196.
  • Haviland, J. B. (2000b). Pointing, gesture spaces, and mental maps. In D.McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 1346). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 109128.
  • Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kita, S. (1998). Expressing a turn at an invisible location in route direction. In E.Hess-Lüttich, J.Müller, & A.vanZoest (Eds.), Signs and space; Raum und Zeichen (pp. 160172). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
  • Kita, S. (Ed.). (2003a). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kita, S. (2003b). Interplay of gaze, hand, torso orientation and language in pointing. In S.Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 307328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 1632.
  • Le Guen, O. (2005). Geografía de lo sagrado entre los Mayas Yucatecos de Quintana Roo – configuración del espacio y su aprendizaje entre los niños. Ketzalcalli, 2(1), 5468.
  • Le Guen, O. (2006). L’organisation et l’apprentissage de l’espace chez les Mayas Yucatèques du Quintana Roo, Mexique, Unpublished Ph.D dissertation. Université Paris X-Nanterre.
  • Le Guen, O. (2009). Geocentric gestural deixis among Yucatecan Mayas (Quintana Roo, México). In K.Mylonas (Ed.), 18th IACCP book of selected congress papers (pp. 123136). Athens, Greece: Pedio Books Publishing.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1991). Relativity in spatial conception and description. Working Paper No. 1. Nijmegen: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1996a). Frames of reference and Molyneaux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P.Bloom, M.Peterson, L.Nadel, & M.Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1996b). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 353382.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1998). Studying spatial conceptualization across cultures: Anthropology and cognitive science. Ethos, 26(1), 724.
  • Levinson, S. C. (2001). Covariation between spatial language and cognition, its implication for the language learning. In M.Bowerman & S. C.Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 566589). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Language, culture and cognition; 5. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Rasch, B. H. (2002). Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition, 84, 155188.
  • Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83, 265294.
  • Lucy, J. A. (1992a). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, No. 12. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lucy, J. A. (1992b). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case of study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lucy, J. A. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291312.
  • Lucy, J. A. (1998). Space in language and thought: Commentary and discussion. Ethos, 26(1), 105111.
  • Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 108114.
  • Martin, J. (2009). Gesture and emotion: Can basic gestural form features discriminate emotions? Presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII-09), IEEE Press.
  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McNeill, D. (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Mishra, R. C., Dasen, P., & Niraula, S. (2003). Ecology, language, and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 6(38), 366383.
  • Newcombe, N. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Learning, development, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401450.
  • Ong, W. J. (1988). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word (New Accents). New York: Methuen.
  • Özyürek, A. (2002). Do speakers design their co-speech gestures for their addresees? The effects of addressee location on representational gestures. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 688704.
  • Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 10401054.
  • Özyürek, A., Willems, R. M., Kita, S., & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(19), 605616.
  • Pederson, E. (1993). Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In S.Hirtle & A.Frank (Eds.), Spatial information theory. A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 294311). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S., Kita, S., & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557589.
  • Sapir, Edward. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and company.
  • Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to speech. In J.Atkinson & J.Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266296). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1(1), 726.
  • Sweetser, E. (1998). Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Presented at the Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes (CD-ROM), Elsevier.
  • Sweetser, E. (2006). Personal and interpersonal gesture spaces: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. In A.Tyler, Y.Kim, & M.Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Cognitive and discourse approaches to language and language learning (pp. 2552). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Vapnarsky, V. (2000). De dialogues en prières, la procession des mots. In A.Monod-Becquelin & P.Erikson (Eds.), Les rituels du dialogue. Promenades ethnolinguistiques en terres amérindiennes (pp. 431479). Nanterre, France: Société d’ethnologie.
  • Vapnarsky, V. (2003). Recorridos instauradores: configuración y apropriación del espacio y del tiempo entre los mayas yucatecos. In A.Breton & A.Monod-Becquelin (Eds.), Espacios mayas: Representaciones, usos, creencias (pp. 363381). Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Estudios Mayas.
  • Wassmann, J., & Dasen, P. (1998). Balinese spatial orientation: Some empirical evidence of moderate linguistic relativity. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 4, 689711.
  • Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. New York: John Wiley & Sons and The Technology Press of M.I.T.