SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Behrens, H. (2000). Anleitung zur Kodierung und Disambiguierung von Erwerbsdaten des Deutschen. Unpublished manuscript. Germany: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig.
  • Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289300.
  • Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425455.
  • Bybee, J. L. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bybee, J. L. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Chemla, E., Mintz, T. H., Bernal, S., & Christophe, A. (2009). Categorizing words using ‘frequent frames’: What cross-linguistic analyses reveal about distributional acquisition strategies. Developmental Science, 12, 396406.
  • Erkelens, M. A. (2009). Learning to categorize verbs and nouns: Studies on Dutch. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
  • Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., & Gobet, F. (2009). On the utility of conjoint and compositional frames and utterance boundaries as predictors of word categories. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, USA, 08, 19471952.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University Press.
  • Gòmez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431436.
    Direct Link:
  • Gòmez, R. L., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7, 183206.
  • Haccou, P., & Meelis, E. (1992). Statistical analysis of behavioural data. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M. L., & Raymond, W. D. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In J. L.Bybee & P.Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 229254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 174, 43.
  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES-project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Matthews, D., & Bannard, C. (2010). Children’s production of unfamiliar word sequences is predicted by positional variability and latent classes in a large sample of child-directed speech. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 465488.
  • Mintz, T. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90, 91117.
  • Mintz, T. (2006). Finding the verbs: Distributional cues to categories available to young learners. In K.Hirsh-Pasek & R. M.Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 3163). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L., & Bever, T. G. (2002). The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science, 26, 393424.
  • Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2004). What distributional information is useful and usable in language acquisition? Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, USA, 04, 963968.
  • Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2007). The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 259305.
  • Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. (1996). Signal to syntax: An overview. In J. L.Morgan & K.Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Morgan, J. L., Shi, R., & Allopenna, P. (1996). Perceptual bases of rudimentary grammatical categories: Towards a broader conceptualization of bootstrapping. In J. L.Morgan & K.Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 263283). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2004). Variability is the spice of learning, and a crucial ingredient for detecting and generalizing nonadjacent dependencies. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, USA, 04, 10471052.
  • Redington, M., Chater, N., & Finch, S. (1998). Distributional information: A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science, 22, 425469.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 19261928.
  • Stoll, S., Abbot-Smith, K., & Lieven, E. (2009). Lexically restricted utterances in Russian, German and English child-directed speech. Cognitive Science, 33, 75103.
  • Szagun, G., Stumper, B., Sondag, N., & Franik, M. (2007). The acquisition of gender marking by young German-speaking children: Evidence for learning guided by phonological regularities. Journal of Child Language, 34, 445471.
  • Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.