SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baker, M. (2001). The atoms of language. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bernstein-Ratner, N. (1984). Patterns of vowel modification in motherese. Journal of Child Language, 11, 557578.
  • Berwick, R. (1982). Locality principles and the acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Berwick, R., & Chomsky, N. (2011). Biolinguistics: The current state of its evolution and development. In A. M.Di Sciullo & C.Boecx (Eds.), Biolinguistic investigations (pp. 1941). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Berwick, R., & Weinberg, A. (1984). The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Carroll, S. (2005). Endless forms most beautiful. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  • Chomsky, N. (1971). Problems of knowledge and freedom. London: Fontana.
  • Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
  • Chomsky, N. (1980a). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1980b). On cognitive structures and their development. In M.Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 3554). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
  • Chung, S., & McCloskey, J. (1987). Government, barriers and small clauses in modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 173237.
  • Church, A. (1941). The calculi of lambda conversion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Clark, A. (2010). Efficient, correct, unsupervised learning of context-sensitive languages. In M.Lapata & A.Sakar (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Meeting on Natural Language Learning (pp. 2837). Uppsala, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Clark, A., & Eyraud, R. (2007). Polynomial time identification in the limit of substitutable context-free languages. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8, 17251745.
  • Clark, A., Eyraud, R., & Habrard, A. (2008). A polynomial algorithm for the inference of context free languages. In A.Clark, A. F.Coste & L.Miclet (Eds.), Grammatical inference: Algorithms and applications, lecture notes in computer science 5728 (pp. 2942). New York: Springer.
  • Crain, S., & Nakayama, S. (1987). Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language, 63, 522543.
  • Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (forthcoming). The language faculty. In E.Margolis, S.Laurence, & S.Stich (Eds.), The handbook for philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments in the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Dyer, F., & Dickinson, J. (1994). Development of sun compensation by honeybees: How partially experienced bees estimate the sun’s course. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 44714474.
  • Elman, J. (2003). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 7199.
  • Fong, S. (2011). Minimalist parsing: Simplicity and feature unification. Workshop on Language and Recursion. Mons, Belgium: University of Mons. March.
  • Fox, D., & Pesetsky, D. (2004). Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 146.
  • Gallistel, C. R. (2007) Learning organs. English original of L’apprentissage de matières distinctes exige des organes distincts. In J.Bricmont & J.Franck (Eds.), Cahier n° 88: Noam Chomsky (pp. 181187). Paris: L’Herne.
  • Gazdar, G. (1981). Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 155184.
  • Harris, Z. (1951). From morpheme to utterance. Language, 22, 161183.
  • Higginbotham, J. (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 547593.
  • Horning, J. (1969). A study of grammatical inference (Tech. rep. #139). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
  • Hornstein, N. (2000). Move! a minimalist theory of Construal (2000). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. (1981). Introduction. In N.Hornstein & D.Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics (pp. 931). London: Longman.
  • Huybregts, R. (2008). Linguistic argumentation and poverty of the stimulus arguments. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utretcht.
  • Jackendoff, R. (1993). Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Kam, X. N. C. (2007). Statistical induction in the acquisition of auxiliary-inversion. In H.Caunt-Nulton, S.Kulatilake & I.Woo, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 345357). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Kam, X. N. C. (2009). Contributions of statistical induction to models of syntax acquisition. PhD dissertation, New York: The Graduate Center of the City University of New York.
  • Kam, X.-N. C., Stoyneshka, I., Tornyova, L., Fodor, J. D., & Sakas, W. G. (2008). Bigrams and the richness of the stimulus. Cognitive Science, 32, 771787.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2001). The poverty of the stimulus argument. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 217276.
  • Lewis, J. D., & Elman, J. (2001). Learnability and poverty of stimulus arguments revisited. In B.Skarabela, S.Fish, & A. H.Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 359370). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • McCloskey, J. (1991). Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua, 85, 259302.
  • McCloskey, J. (1996). On the scope of verb raising in Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 47104.
  • McCloskey, J. (2009). Irish as a configurational language. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Syntax Circle.
  • Meyer, A., & Fischer, M. (1969). Economy of description by automata, grammars, and formal systems. Mathematical Systems Theory, 3, 110118.
  • Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J., & Regier, T. (2011). Poverty of the stimulus: A rational approach. Cognition, 118, 306338.
  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1980). Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Pullum, G., & Scholz, B. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19, 950.
  • Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science, 29, 10071028.
  • Resop, J. (2006). A comparison of artificial neural networks and statistical regression with biological resource applications. MS thesis, College Park, MD: University of Maryland at College Park.
  • Ristad, E. (1986). Computational complexity of current GPSG theory. AI Lab Memo 894, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Published as, Ross, J. R. (1986). Infinite syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Sarle, W. (1994). Neural networks and statistical models. Proceedings of the 19th annual SAS users group meeting , Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 15381550.
  • Solomonoff, R. (1964). A formal theory of inductive inference. Information and Control, 7, 122.
  • Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Uszkoreit, H., & Peters, S. (1986). On some formal properties of metarules. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 477494.