SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9(4), 321324.
    Direct Link:
  • Bartlett, S., Kondrak, G., & Cherry, C. (2009). On the syllabification of phonemes. Paper presented at the Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Boulder, CO.
  • Beckman, J. N. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology, 14, 146.
  • Berent, I., Lennertz, T., Jun, J., Moreno, M. A., & Smolensky, P. (2008). Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(14), 53215325.
  • Berent, I., Steriade, D., Lennertz, T., & Vaknin, V. (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition, 104(3), 591630.
  • Blanchard, D., Heinz, J., & Golinkoff, R. (2010). Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 487511.
  • Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81(2), B33B44.
  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
  • Church, K. W. (1987). Phonological parsing in speech recognition. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 283333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clements, G. N. (2006). Does sonority have a phonetic basis? In E. Raimy & C. E. Cairns (Eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory (pp. 165176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Daland, R., Hayes, B., Garellek, M., White, J., Davis, A., & Norrmann, I. (2011). Explaining sonority projection effects. Phonology, 28(2), 197234.
  • Davidson, L. (2006). Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 104137.
  • Davis, M. (2004). Connectionist modelling of lexical segmentation and vocabulary acquisition. In P. Quinlan (Ed.), Connectionist models of development: Developmental processes in real and artificial neural networks (pp. 151188). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Science, 32(5), 429448. discussion 448–494.
  • Finn, A. S., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2008). The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners’ use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition, 108(2), 477499.
  • Frank, M. C., Goldwater, S., Mansinghka, V., Griffiths, T., & Tenenbaum, J. (2007). Modeling human performance on statistical word segmentation tasks. In D. S. McNamara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 281286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gierut, J. A. (1999). Syllable onsets: Clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(3), 708726.
  • Gomez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431436.
    Direct Link:
  • Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hyman, L. M. (2008). Universals in phonology. Linguistic Review, 25(1–2), 83137.
  • Jakobson, R. (1962). Selected writings I: Phonological studies. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
  • Johnson, E. K., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 548567.
  • Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 123.
  • Jusczyk, P. W., Hohne, E. A., & Bauman, A. (1999). Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(8), 14651476.
  • Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in english-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3–4), 159207.
  • Katz, J. (2005). SoftVoice. Los Angeles, CA: SoftVoice, Inc.
  • Levitt, A., Jusczyk, P. W., Murray, J., & Carden, G. (1988). Context effects in two-month-old infants’ perception of labiodental/interdental fricative contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 361368.
  • Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431461.
  • MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (2000). On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science, 288(5465), 527531.
  • Mattys, S. L., Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38(4), 465494.
  • Mattys, S. L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2007). Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 554567.
  • Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 545564.
  • Ohala, J. (1990). Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In M. Ziolkowski, M. Noske, & K. Deaton (Eds.), CLS 26: Volume 2: The Parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology (Vol. 26, pp. 319338). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  • Ohala, D. (1996). Cluster reduction and constraints in acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.
  • Parker, S. (2008). Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 5590.
  • Peperkamp, S. (2007). Do we have innate knowledge about phonological markedness? Comments on Berent, Steriade, Lennertz, and Vaknin. Cognition, 104(3), 631637. discussion 638–643.
  • Redford, M. A. (2008). Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics. Cognition, 107(3), 785816.
  • Rytting, C. A., Brew, C., & Fosler-Lussier, E. (2010). Segmenting words from natural speech: Subsegmental variation in segmental cues. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 513543.
  • Saffran, J. R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 172196.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 19261928.
  • Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606621.
  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
  • Steriade, D. (1999). Alternatives to syllable-based accounts of consonantal phonotactics. In O. Fujimura, B. Joseph, & B. Palek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 linguistics and phonetics conference (pp. 205242). Prague: Karolinum Press.
  • Swingley, D. (2005). Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary. Cognitive Psychology, 50(1), 86132.
  • Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 706716.
  • Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A. (2009). Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), 367376.
  • Vaux, B., & Wolfe, A. (2009). The appendix. In E. Raimy & C. E. Cairns (Eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology (pp. 101143). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2004). Tuned to the signal: The privileged status of speech for young infants. Developmental Science, 7(3), 270276.
  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1992). The organization and reorganization of human speech perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 377402.