• Akhtar, N., & Montague, L. (1999). Early lexical acquisition: The role of cross-situational learning. First Language, 19, 34358.
  • Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Carey, S. (1978). The child as word-learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Diesendruck, G., & Markson, L. (2001). Children’s avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology, 37, 630641.
  • Frank, M. C., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. (2009). Using speakers’ referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning. Psychological Science, 20, 579585.
    Direct Link:
  • Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73, 135176.
  • Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 355.
  • Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L. B., Woodward, A. L., Akhtar, N., Tomasello, M., & Hollich, G. (2000). Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gomez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431436.
    Direct Link:
  • Ichinco, D., Frank, M. C., & Saxe, R. (2009). Cross-situational word learning respects mutual exclusivity. In N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn, J. Nerbonne, & L. Schomaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 22142219). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Kachergis, G., Yu, C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2009). Frequency and contextual diversity effects in cross-situational word learning. In N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn, J. Nerbonne, & L. Schomaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 22202225). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Brandone, A. C. (2008). Focusing on the relation: Fewer exemplars facilitate children’s initial verb learning and extension. Developmental Science, 11, 628634.
  • Markman, E. M. (1992). Constraints on word learning: Speculations about their nature, origins, and domain specificity. In M. R. Gunnar & M. Maratsos (Eds.), Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, (Vol. 25, pp. 59101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. (1988). Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meaning of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121157.
  • Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of grammatical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12, 339349.
  • Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning. Infancy, 15, 608636.
  • Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S. (1997). Incidental language learning: Listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science, 8, 101105.
    Direct Link:
  • Seger, C. A. (1998) Multiple forms of implicit learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 295320). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Siskind, J. M. (1996). A computational study of cross-situational techiniques for learning word-to-meaning mappings. Cognition, 61, 3991.
  • Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106, 15581568.
  • Smith, K., Smith, A. D. M., & Blythe, R. A. (2009). Reconsidering human cross-situational learning capacities: A revision to Yu & Smith’s (2007) experimental paradigm. In N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn, J. Nerbonne, & L. Schomaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 27112716). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Turke-Browne, N. B., Junge, J., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552564.
  • Vouloumanos, A. (2008). Fine-grained sensitivity to statistical information in adult word learning. Cognition, 107, 729742.
  • Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Infants’ learning of novel words in a stochastic environment. Developmental Psychology, 45, 16111617.
  • Yu, C. (2008). A statistical associative account of vocabulary growth in early word learning. Language Learning and Development, 4, 3262.
  • Yu, C., & Ballard, D. H. (2007). A unified model of early word learning: Integrating statistical learning and social cues. Neurocomputing, 70, 21492165.
  • Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18, 414420.
    Direct Link:
  • Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2011). What you learn is what you see: Using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning. Developmental Science, 14, 165180.
  • Yu, C., Smith, L. B., Klein, K. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2007). Associative learning and hypothesis testing in cross-situational word learning: Are they one and the same? In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 737742). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Yurovsky, D., & Yu, C. (2008). Mutual exclusivity in cross-situational statistical learning. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. Sloutsky (Eds.) Proceedings of the 30st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 715720). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.