SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115147.
  • Chater, N. (1999). The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 273302.
  • Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2008). From universal laws of cognition to specific cognitive models. Cognitive Science, 32, 3667.
  • Chater, N., & Vitanyi, P. (2003). Simplicity: A unifying principle in cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 1922.
  • Edelman, S. (2008). Computing the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory Psychological Review, 102, 211245.
  • Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
  • Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Probability, algorithmic complexity, and subjective randomness. Psychological Review, 114, 211244.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2003). Probability, algorithmic complexity, and subjective randomness. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA..
  • Hogarth, W. (1753). The analysis of beauty. London. Paul Mellon Center for Studies in British Art (1998) (reprint).
  • Kant, I. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft [The critique of pure reason]. English translation, Encyclopedia Britannica (1952) (reprint).
  • Kintsch, W. (1994). Kognitionspsychologische Modelle des Textverstehens: Literarische Texte. In K. Reusser & M. Reusser-Weyeneth (Eds.), Verstehen: Psychologischer Process und didaktische Aufgabe (pp. 3953). Bern: Huber.
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kintsch, W. (2009). Learning and constructivism. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 223241). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & CO.
  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the definition of the concept ‘quantity of information’. Problems in Information Transmission, 1, 17.
  • Lea, R. B., Rapp, D. N., Elfenbein, A., Mitchel, A. D., & Romine, R. S. (2008). Sweet silent thought: Alliteration and resonance in poetry comprehension. Psychological Science, 19, 709716.
    Direct Link:
  • Mach, E. (1886). Analyse der Empfindungen [The analysis of sensation]. Jena: Fischer. English translation, Chicago: Open Court (1897) (reprint).
  • McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (2000). A procedural explanation of the generation effect for simple and difficult multiplication problems and answers. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 652679.
  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 8197.
  • Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 419–491). New York: Wiley.
  • Millis, K. K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1, 320329.
  • Millis, K., & Larson, M. (2008). Applying the construction-integration framework to aesthetic responses to representational artworks. Discourse Process, 45, 263287.
  • Piaget, J. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge and Kegan.
  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 1551.
  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364382.
  • Rensink, R. A. (2000). Scene perception. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 151155). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidhuber, J. (1991). Curious model-building control systems. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Singapore. IEEE, 2, 14581463.
  • Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Low-complexity art. Leonardo, Journal of the International Society for the Arts, Sciences, and Technology, 30, 97103.
  • Schmidhuber, J. (2006). Developmental robotics, optimal artificial curiosity, creativity, music, and the fine arts. Connection Science, 18, 173187.
  • Schmidhuber, J. (2009). Driven by compression processes: A simple principle explains essential aspects of subjective beauty, novelty, surprise, interestingness, attention, curiosity, creativity, art, science, music, jokes. Journal of SICE, 48, 2132.
  • Schopenhauer, A. (18181819). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung [The world as will and representation]. English translation. Dover Editions (1966) (reprint).
  • Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Solso, R. (2003). The psychology of art and the evolution of the conscious brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Titchner, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: MacMillan.
  • Vitanyi, P. M. B., & Li, M. (2000). Minimum description length induction, Bayesianism, and Kolmogorov complexity. IIIE Transactions on Information Theory, 46, 446464.
  • Wundt, W. (1887). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.