SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abbruzzese, J. E. (1997). The coherence of omniscience: A defense. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 41(1), 2534.
  • Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713770.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Barrett, J. L. (1998). Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the divine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 608619.
  • Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? New York: AltaMira Press.
  • Barrett, J. L. (2008). Why Santa Claus is not a god. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8(1–2), 149161.
  • Barrett, J. L., & Johnson, A. H. (2003). The role of control in attributing intentional agency to inanimate objects. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 3(3), 208217.
  • Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219247.
  • Bering, J. M., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). “O Lord…you perceive my thoughts from afar”: Recursiveness and the evolution of supernatural agency. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 118142.
  • Boyer, P. (2000). Functional origins of religious concepts: Ontological and strategic selection in evolved minds. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6, 195214.
  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Boyer, P. (2002). Why go gods and spirits matter at all? In I. Pyysiäinen & A. Veikko (Eds.), Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion (pp. 6892). New York: Continuum.
  • Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Boston: McGraw Hill.
  • Chagnon, N. A. (1996). The Yanomamo. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Cohen, E. (2007). The mind possessed: The cognition of spirit possession in an Afro-Brazilian religious tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cohen, A. B., & Hill, P. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75, 709742.
  • Cohen, A. B., Shariff, A. F., & Hill, P. C. (2008). The accessibility of religious beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 14081417.
  • Cohen, A. B., Siegel, J. I., & Rozin, P. (2003). Faith versus practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 287295.
  • Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 240247.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Part II. Case study: A computational theory of social exchange. Ethology & Sociobiology, 10, 5197.
  • Draine, S. (2006). Inquisit 2.0 [Computer software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
  • Fazio, R. H., Chen, J., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(4), 339357.
  • Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 505514.
  • Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. Premack (Eds.). Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 150184). Oxford, England: Plenum Press.
  • Gervais, W., & Henrich, J. (2010). The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 383389.
  • Gray, K., & Wegner, D.M. (2010). Blaming God for our pain: Suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 716.
  • Grim, P. (1983). Some neglected problems of omniscience. American Philosophical Quarterly, 20(3), 265276.
  • Guthrie, S. E. (1980). A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology, 21, 181203.
  • Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hughes, G. (1995). The Nature of God: An introduction to the philosophy of religion. New York: Routledge.
  • Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods: A test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Human Nature, 16, 410446.
  • Johnson, D. D. P., & Bering, J. (2006). Hand of God, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 219233.
  • Kapitan, T. (1991). Agency and omniscience. Religious Studies, 27(1), 105120.
  • Knight, N., Sousa, P., Barrett, J. L., & Atran, S. (2004). Children’s attributions of beliefs to humans and God: Cross-cultural evidence. Cognitive Science, 28, 117126.
  • Kretzmann, N. (1966). Omniscience and immutability. The Journal of Philosophy, 63(14), 409421.
  • Lahti, D. C. (2009). The correlated history of social organization, morality, and religion. In E. Voland & W. Schiefenhövel (Eds.), The evolution of religious mind and behavior (pp. 6788). New York: Springer.
  • Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., & Evans, E. M. (2010). Children’s understanding of ordinary and extraordinary minds. Child Development, 81(5), 14751489.
  • Lee, R. B. (2003). The Dobe Ju/’Hoansi. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing,
  • Nicholas, L. J. (2004). The association between religiosity, sexual fantasy, participation in sexual acts, sexual enjoyment, exposure, and reaction to sexual materials among Black South Africans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30, 3742.
  • Nicholas, L. J., & Durrheim, K. (1995). Religiosity, aids, and sexuality knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices of black South-African first-year university students. Psychological Reports, 77, 13281330.
  • Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A.F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 5862.
  • Orwell, G. (2003 [1949]). Nineteen eighty-four. New York: Plume.
  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515526.
  • Purzycki, B. G. (2010). Spirit masters, ritual cairns, and the adaptive religious system in Tyva. Sibirica, 9(2), 2147.
  • Purzycki, B. G. (2011). Tyvan cher eezi and the socioecological constraints of supernatural agents’ minds. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 1(1), 3145.
  • Purzycki, B. G., & Sosis, R. (2011). Our gods: Variation in supernatural minds. In Ulrich Frey (Ed.), Essential blocks of human nature (pp. 7793). New York: Springer.
  • Pyysiäinen, I. (2009). Supernatural agents: Why we believe in souls, gods, and buddhas. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Richert, R. A., & Barrett, J. L. (2005). Do you see what I see? Young children’s assumptions about God’s perceptual abilities. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(4), 283295.
  • Roes, F., & Raymond, M. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 126135.
  • Rohrbaugh, J., & Jessor, R. (1975). Religiosity in youth: A personal control against deviant behavior. Journal of Personality, 43(1), 136155.
  • Sanderson, S. K. (2008). Religious attachment theory and the biosocial evolution of the major world religions. In J. Bulbulia, R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, & K. Wyman (Eds.), The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 6772). Santa Margarita, CA: Collins Foundation Press.
  • Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 1(1), 4699.
  • Scholl, B.J., & Tremoulet, P.D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299308.
  • Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803809.
    Direct Link:
  • Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of God predict cheating behavior. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 8596.
  • Slone, D. J. (2004). Theological incorrectness: Why religious people believe what they shouldn’t. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Stark, R. (2001). Gods, rituals, and the moral order. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(4), 619636.
  • Sugiyama, L. S., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2002). Cross-cultural evidence of cognitive adaptations for social exchange among the Shiwiar of Ecuadorian Amazonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(17), 1153711542.
  • Swanson, G. E. (1960). The birth of the gods: The origin of primitive beliefs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2012). The group-member mind trade-off. Psychological Science, 23(1), 7785.