SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aikhenvald, A. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Behrens, L. (2005). Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistics, 43 (2), 275344.
  • Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 6180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
  • Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Corbett, G. G., & Fraser, M. N. (2000). Gender assignment: A typology and a model. In G. Senft (Ed.), Systems of nominal classification (pp. 293325). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Flaherty, M. (2001). How a language gender system creeps into perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (1), 1831.
  • Fox, A. (1990). The structure of German. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23 (3), 183209.
  • Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gutheil, G., Vera, A., & Keil, F. C. (1998). Do houseflies think? Patterns of induction and biological beliefs in development. Cognition, 66, 3349.
  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1994). Young children’s naive theory of biology. Cognition, 50 (1–3), 171188.
  • Heit, E., & Rubinstein, J. (1994). Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20 (2), 411422.
  • Imai, M., Saalbach, H., & Stern, E. (2010a). Are Chinese and German children taxonomic, thematic, or shape biased? Influence of classifiers and cultural contexts. Frontiers in Cultural Psychology, 1, 194, 1-10.
  • Imai, M., Schalk, L., Saalbach, H., & Okada, H. (2010b). Influence of grammatical gender on deductive reasoning about sex-specific properties of animals. In R. Catrambone & S. Ohlsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 11601165). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1996). Young children’s recognition of animals and plants. Child Development, 67 (6), 28232840.
  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2003). Conceptual and linguistic factors in inductive projection: How do young children recognize commonalities between animals and plants. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 313334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Konishi, T. (1993). The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22 (5), 519534.
  • MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs for the Society of Research in Child Development, 43 (1/2), 1123.
  • Markovits, H. (2000). A mental model analysis of young children’s conditional reasoning with meaningful premises. Thinking and Reasoning, 6 (4), 335347.
  • Mills, A. E. (1985). The acquisition of German. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 1. The data (pp. 141254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mills, A. E. (1986). Acquisition of the natural-gender rule in English and German. Linguistics, 24, 3145.
  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Phillips, W., & Boroditsky, L. (2003). Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh ( ed .), Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 928933). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ross, N., Medin, D. L., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 2547.
  • Saalbach, H., & Imai, M. (2007). Scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 (3), 485501.
  • Sera, M. D., Berge, C. A. H., & del Castillo Pintado, J. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9 (3), 261292.
  • Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M. C., Rodriguez, W., & Dubois, D. P. (2002). When language affects cognition and when does it not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131 (3), 377397.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis, & H. Filip, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 435445). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 7096). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sloutsky, V., & Fisher, A. V. (2004). Induction and categorization in young children: A similarity-based model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (2), 166188.
  • Sloutsky, V., Lo, Y.-F., & Fisher, A. V. (2001). How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive inference. Child Development, 72 (6), 16951709.
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name correspondence, image correspondence, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6 (2), 174215.
  • Szagun, G. (2004). Learning by ear: On the acquisition of case and gender marking by German-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language, 31, 130.
  • Szagun, G., & Steinbrink, C. (2004). Typikalität und Variabilität in der frühkindlichen Sprachentwicklung: Eine Studie mit einem Elternfragebogen. [Regularity and variability of early stages of language development: A study using a questionnaire.] Sprache Stimme Gehör, 28, 137145.
  • Tan, L. H., Chan, A. H. D., Kay, P., Khong, P. L., Yip, L. K. C., & Luke, K. K. (2008). Language affects patterns of brain activation associated with perceptual decision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 40044009.
  • Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J.-R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 45674570.
  • Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Indefrey, P., Levelt, W. J. M., & Hellwig, F. (2004). Role of grammatical gender and semantics in German word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30 (2), 483497.
  • Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K. (2005). Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implication for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (4), 501520.
  • Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29 (3), 257302.
  • Zubin, D., & Köpcke, K.-M. (1986). Gender and folk taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical gender and lexical categorization. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 139180). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.