Assessing the Incremental Algorithm: A Response to Krahmer et al.
Version of Record online: 1 JUN 2012
Copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
Volume 36, Issue 5, pages 842–845, July 2012
How to Cite
Deemter, K. v., Gatt, A., Sluis, I. v. d. and Power, R. (2012), Assessing the Incremental Algorithm: A Response to Krahmer et al. Cognitive Science, 36: 842–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01259.x
- Issue online: 3 JUL 2012
- Version of Record online: 1 JUN 2012
- Received 9 April 2012; received in revised form 11 April 2012; accepted 11 April 2012
- 1995). Computational interpretations of the Gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science 18, 233–263. & (
- 2012). Computational generation of referring expressions: A survey. Computational Linguistics 38(1), 173–218. , & (
- 2012). Is it that difficult to find a good preference order for the incremental algorithm? Cognitive Science 36, 837–841. , & (
- 2012). Generation of referring expressions: Assessing the incremental algorithm. Cognitive Science 36, 799–836. , , & (
- 2009). One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples. In. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci-2009). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , , , & (