SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bentham, J. (1970). Idea of a complete law. In H. L. A. Hart (Ed.), Of laws in general (pp. 156177). London: Athlone press.
  • Blake, P., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Children’s understanding of ownership transfers. Cognitive Development, 24, 133145.
  • Bliege, B. R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221248.
  • Brosnan, S. F.. (2011). Property in nonhuman primates. In H. Ross & O. Friedman (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 922.
  • Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of cheap, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 35.
  • Cohen, F. S. (1954). Dialogue on private property. Rutgers Law Review, 9, 357387.
  • Cram, F., & Ng, S. H. (1989). Children’s endorsement of ownership attributes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 6375.
  • Demsetz, H. (1967). Towards a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57, 347359.
  • DeScioli, P., & Wilson, B. J. (2011). The territorial foundations of human property. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 297304.
  • Dukeminier, J., Krier, J. E., Alexander, G. S., & Schill, M. H. (2006). Property (6th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.
  • Fasig, L. G. (2000). Toddlers’ understanding of ownership: Implications for self-concept development. Social Development, 9, 370382.
  • Friedman, O. (2008). First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 290295.
  • Friedman, O. (2010). Necessary for possession: How people reason about the acquisition of ownership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 11611169.
  • Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107, 829849.
  • Gintis, H. (2007). The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 64, 116.
  • Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism—collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96109.
  • Goodenough, O., & Decker, G.. (2009). Why do good people steal intellectual property? In M. Freeman & O. Goodenough (Eds.), Law, mind, and brain (pp. 345372). London: Ashgate.
  • Hay, D. F. (2006). “Yours and mine”: Toddlers’ talk about possession with familiar peers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 3952.
  • Hay, D. F., Nash, A., & Pedersen, J. (1983). Interaction between six-month-old peers. Child Development, 54, 557582.
  • Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. (2001). The evolution of prestige. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165196.
  • Herzog, I. (1930). Possession in Jewish law. Temple Law Quarterly, 4, 329338.
  • Hook, J. (1993). Judgment about the right to property from preschool to adulthood. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 135146.
  • Isaacs, S.. (1933). Social development in young children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social behavior and applications (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 149). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Kim, S., & Kalish, C. W. (2009). Children’s ascriptions of property rights with changes of ownership. Cognitive Development, 24, 322336.
  • Mandel, G. N. (2006). Patently non-obvious: Empirical demonstration that the hindsight bias renders patent decisions irrational. Ohio State Law Journal, 67, 13911463.
  • Maynard Smith, J., & Parker, G. A. (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behavior, 24, 159175.
  • Merrill, T. W. (1998). Property and the right to exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77, 730755.
  • Miller, G.. (2000). The Mating Mind. New York: Doubleday.
  • Neary, K. R., Friedman, O., & Burnstein, C. L. (2009). Preschoolers infer ownership from “control of permission.” Developmental Psychology, 45, 873876.
  • Newman, D.. (1978). Ownership and permission among nursery school children. In J. Glick & K. Clarke-Stewart (Eds.), The development of social understanding (pp. 86101). New York: Gardner Press.
  • Newman, J. M. (2011). Holden Caufield grows up: Salinger v. Colting, the promotion-of-progress requirement, and market failure in derivative-works regime. Iowa Law Review, 96, 737759.
  • Olson, K. R.. (2009). The development of understanding intellectual property ownership. Talk presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Conference, Tampa, FL.
  • Olson, K. R., & Shaw, A. (2011). “No fair, copycat!”: What children’s response to plagiarism tells us about their understanding of ideas. Developmental Science, 14, 431439.
  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 471488.
  • Ramsey, P. G. (2001). Possession episodes in young children’s social interactions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 315325.
  • Ross, H. S. (1996). Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology, 32, 90101.
  • Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121, 219227.
  • Smetana, J. G. (1981). Preschool children’s conceptions of moral and social rules. Child Development, 52, 13331336.
  • Snare, F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 200206.
  • Stake, J. E. (2004). The property “instinct.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359, 17631774.
  • Weigel, R. M. (1984). The application of evolutionary models to the study of decisions made by children during object possession conflicts. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 229238.