SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 560585.
  • Bonin, P., Barry, C., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2004). The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 456476.
  • Bonin, P., Méot, A., Mermillod, M., Ferrand, L., & Barry, C. (2009). The effects of age of acquisition and frequency trajectory on object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 19.
  • Bowers, J. S., Mattys, S. L., & Gage, S. H. (2009). Preserved implicit knowledge of a forgotten childhood language. Psychological Science, 20, 10641069.
    Direct Link:
  • Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58, 412424.
  • Burani, C., Arduino, L. S., & Barca, L. (2007). Frequency, not age of acquisition affects Italian word naming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 828866.
  • Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Boyer, B., & Fayol, M. (2003). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with other variables used in psycholinguistic experiments, the English data from Morrison et al.(1997) and naming latencies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 209245.
  • Cuetos, F., Alvarez, B., Gonzales-Nosti, M., Méot, A., & Bonin, P. (2006). Determinants of lexical access in speech production: Role of word frequency and age of acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 34, 9991010.
  • Dent, K., Johnston, R. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 34, 282301.
  • Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 11031123.
  • French, R. M. (1999). Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (4), 128135.
  • Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 163, 491528.
  • Hazard, M.-C., De Cara, B., & Chanquoy, L. (2007). Normes d’âge d’acquisition objectif des mots et recherche de prédicteurs : Importance du choix de la base de fréquence lexicale. L’Année Psychologique, 107, 427457.
  • Hazard, M.-C., De Cara, B., & Chanquoy, L. (2008). Normes de fréquence cumulée et trajectoire fréquentielle comme prédicteurs de l’âge d’acquisition. L’Année Psychologique, 108, 487516.
  • Hebb, D. O. (1949). Organization of behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  • Hetherington, P., & Seidenberg, M. (1989). “Is there ‘catastrophic interference’ in connectionist networks? Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 7495.
  • Izura, C., Pérez, M. A., Agallou, E., Wright, V. C., Marín, J., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Ellis, A. W. (2011). Age/order of acquisition effects and the cumulative learning of foreign words: A word training study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 3258.
  • Johnston, R. A., & Barry, C. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing. Visual Cognition, 13, 789845.
  • Juhasz, B. (2005). Age-of-Acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 684712.
  • Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Ehsan, S. (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition, 13, 884910.
  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 175.
  • McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419437.
  • Mermillod, M., Bonin, P., Mondillon, L., Alleysson, D., & Vermeulen, N. (2010). Coarse scales are sufficient for efficient categorization of emotional facial expressions: evidence from neural computation. Neurocomputing, 73, 25222531.
  • Mermillod, M., Vermeulen, N., Lundqvist, D., & Niedenthal, P.M. (2009). Neural computation as a tool to differentiate perceptual from emotional processes: The case of anger superiority effect. Cognition, 110, 346357.
  • Meschyan, G., & Hernandez, A. E. (2002). Is native language decoding skill related to second language learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 1422.
  • Monaghan, P., & Ellis, A. W. (2010). Modeling reading development: Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 506525.
  • Moore, V. (2003). An alternative account for the effects of age of acquisition. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon. “Some words to talk about words (pp. 6793). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publisher.
  • Munro, P. W. (1986). State-dependent factors influence neural plasticity: A partial account of the critical period. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2 (pp. 471502). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M, Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (2003). Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: Can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex, 13, 155161.
  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56115.
  • Raman, I. (2006). On the age-of-acquisition effects in word naming and orthographic transparency: Mapping specific or universal? Visual Cognition, 13 (7/8), 10441053.
  • Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523568.
  • Seidenberg, M. S., & Zevin, J. D. (2006). Connectionist models in developmental cognitive neuroscience: Critical periods and the paradox of success. In Y. Munakata and M. Johnson (Eds.), Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Attention and Performance XXI. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Stewart, N., & Ellis, A. W. (2008). Order of acquisition in learning perceptual categories: A laboratory analogue of the age of acquisition effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 7074.
  • Ventureyra, V., Pallier, C., & Yoo, H.-Y. (2004). The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 7991.
  • Zeno, S. (Ed.). (1995) The educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NJ: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
  • Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 129.
  • Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory and Cognition, 32, 3138.
  • Zevin, J. D., Seidenberg, M. S., & Bottjer, S. W. (2004). Limits on reacquisition of song in adult zebra finches exposed to white noise. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 58495862.