SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Frames, concepts, conceptual fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientist (pp. 2174), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577609.
  • Bergen, B. K., & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulatio-based language understanding. In J. O. Ostman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive groundings and theoretical extensions (pp. 147190). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Blakemkore, S.-J., Bristow, D., Bird, G., Frith, C., & Ward, J. (2005). Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. Brain, 128 (7), 15711583.
  • Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
  • Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermueller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with your motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 19051914.
  • Brunye, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective-taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20, 2732.
    Direct Link:
  • Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Walters, E. K., & Taylor, H. A. (2010). You heard it here first: Readers mentally simulate described sounds. Acta Psychologica, 135, 209215.
  • Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modeling cerebral asymmetries of semantic memory using high-dimensional semantic space. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right Hemisphere Language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 215244). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Press.
  • Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240247.
  • Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2010). Look but don’t touch: Tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific words. Cognition, 115, 19.
  • van Dam, W. O., van Dijk, M., Bekkering, H., & Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2011). Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Human Brain Mapping. Doi: 10.1002/hbm.21365.
  • Ditman, T., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2010). Simulating an enactment effect: Pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension. Cognition, 115, 172178.
  • Ditman, T., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). Time travel through language: Temporal shifts rapidly decrease information accessibility during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 750756.
  • Dove, G. O. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110, 412431.
  • Dove, G. (2011). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 242.
  • Ebisch, S. J. H., Perrucci, M. G., Ferretti, A., Del Gratta, C., Luca Romani, G., & Gallese, V. (2008). The sense of touch: Embodied simulation in a visuotactile mirroring mechanism for observed animate or inanimate touch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (9), 16111623.
  • Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models. Memory & Cognition, 29, 336343.
  • Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
  • Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 371.
  • Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (1), 2348.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., & Foertsch, J. (1999). Three models of discourse comprehension. In S. Garrod & M. J. Pickering (Eds.), Human language processing (pp. 283299). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 155.
  • Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Cognitive Science, 1 (4), 586596.
  • Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558565.
  • Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Giovanni, B. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61 (6), 905919.
  • Glover, S., Rosenbaum, D. A., Graham, J., & Dixon, P. (2004). Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 103108.
  • Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hansen, T., Olkkonen, M., Walter, S., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006). Memory modulates color appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 13671378.
  • Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Somatic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41 (2), 301307.
  • Horton, W. S., & Rapp, D. N. (2003). Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 104110.
  • Johnson, R. M., Burton, P. C., & Ro, T. (2006). Visually induced feelings of touch. Brain Research, 1073-1074, 398406.
  • Kaschak, M. P., Zwaan, R. A., Aveyard, M., & Yaxley, R. H. (2006). Perception of auditory motion affects language processing. Cognitive Science, 30, 733744.
  • Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J.-L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron, 42 (2), 335346.
  • Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Are temporal concepts embodied? A challenge for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 240.
  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Landauer, T. K. (2002). On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA. In N. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 41, 4384.
  • Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259284.
  • Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Machery, E. (2007). Concept empiricism: A methodological critique. Cognition, 104, 1946.
  • Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194201.
  • Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Warren, C. M. (2008). Kicking calculators: Contribution of embodied representations to sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (3), 256265.
  • McKenzie, K. J., Poliakoff, E., Brown, R. J., & Lloyd, D. M. (2010). Now you feel it, now you don’t: How robust is the phenomenon of illusory tactile experience?. Perception, 39, 839850.
  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pecher, D., & Boot, I. (2011). Numbers in space: Differences between concrete and abstract situations. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 121.
  • Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119124.
    Direct Link:
  • Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157171.
  • Prinz, J. J. (2005). The return of concept empiricism. In H. Cohen & C. Leferbvre (Eds.), Categorization in Cognitive Science. New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 884892.
  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 121 (9), 16031630.
  • Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47, 388396.
  • Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767780.
  • Richter, T., & Zwaan, R. A. (2010). Integration of perceptual information in word access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 81107.
  • Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 546550.
  • Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Comprehending prehending: Neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 855865.
  • Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Glenberg, A. (2008). Language-induced motor activity in bi-manual object lifting. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 4353.
  • Servos, P., Lederman, S., Wilson, D., & Gati, J. (2001). FMRI-derived cortical maps for shape, texture, and hardness. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 307313.
  • Spivey, M. J., Tyler, M., Richardson, D. C., & Young, E. (2000). Eye movements during comprehension of spoken scene descriptions. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 487492). Mawhah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153156.
    Direct Link:
  • Sular, V., & Okur, A. (2007). Sensory evaluation methods for tactile properties of fabrics. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22, 116.
  • Talati, A., Valero-Cuevas, F. J., & Hirsch, H. (2005). Visual and tactile guidance of dexterous manipulation tasks: And fMRI study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 317334.
  • Tellinghuisen, D. J., & Nowak, E. J. (2003). The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 817828.
  • Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 273281.
  • Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185203.
  • Turatto, M., Galfano, G., Bridgeman, B., & Umilta, C. (2004). Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 301310.
  • Van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cognitive Science, 32, 579590.
  • Willems, R. M., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21 (1), 6774.
  • Willems, R. M., Labruna, L., D’Esposito, M., Ivry, R., & Casasanto, D. (2011). A functional role for the motor system in language understanding: Evidence from theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychological Science, 22, 849854.
  • Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition, 105, 229236.
  • Yoo, S.-S., Freeman, D. K., McCarthy, J. J., & Jolesz, F. A. (2003). Neural substrates of tactile imagery: A functional MRI study. NeuroReport, 14, 581585.
  • Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 1518.
    Direct Link:
  • Zwaan, R. A. (2004). He immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 44) (pp. 3562). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292297.
    Direct Link:
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162185.
  • Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168171.
    Direct Link:
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 111.
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic-relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 954958.