Author’s Note: Ruben P. Viramontez Anguiano, PhD, CFLE, is an Associate Professor in the School of FCS, HDFS Program at Bowling Green State University. Please address correspondence to Ruben P. Viramontez Anguiano, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Writing a Good Peer Review in Family and Consumer Sciences
Version of Record online: 19 SEP 2011
© 2011 American Association of Family and Consumer Sciences
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
Volume 40, Issue 1, pages 93–95, September 2011
How to Cite
Viramontez Anguiano, R. P. (2011), Writing a Good Peer Review in Family and Consumer Sciences. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40: 93–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02092.x
- Issue online: 19 SEP 2011
- Version of Record online: 19 SEP 2011
- peer review;
- qualitative manuscripts;
- quantitative manuscripts
The purpose of this paper was to illustrate how to write a good peer review. The paper provided defintions of peer reviews and blind reviews. It also provides an understanding of what to include in a peer review. Moreover, it recommends how to write a qualitative and quantitative peer review and different factors to avoid. The paper also illustrates how to write a review for a conceptual article. The paper concludes on how the peer review process contributes to scholarship and how the process makes a difference.