SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1994). Operative vaginal delivery (ACOG Technical Bulletin No. 196). Washington, DC: Author.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1995). Dystocia and the augmentation of labor (ACOG Technical Bulletin No. 218). Washington, DC: Author.
  • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. (2003). Dystocia and augmentation of labor (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 49). Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102, 1445-1454.
  • Bax, L., Yu, L. M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, N., & Moons, K. G. M. (2006). MIX: Comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data—Version 1.54. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://www.mix-for-meta-analysis.info/
  • Beynon, C. L. (1957). The normal second stage of labour: A plea for reform in its conduct. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 64, 815-820.
  • Brancato, R. M. (2006). Does the elective primary cesarean section reflect a lack of body-trust in women of contemporary society? Unpublished master’s thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
  • Crawford, J. S. (1983). The stages and phases of labour: An outworn nomenclature that invites hazard. Lancet, 2, 271-272.
  • Fitzpatrick, M., Harkin, R., McQuillan, K., O’Brien, C., O’Connell, P.R., O’Herlihy, C. (2002). A randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal incontinence. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 1359-1365.
  • Fraser, W. D., Marcoux, S., Krauss, I., Douglas, J., Goulet, C., & Boulvain, M. (2000). Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182, 1165-1172.
  • Hanson, S. L., Clark, S. L., & Foster, J. C. (2002). Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 99, 29-34.
  • Manyonda, T., Shaw, D. E., & Drife, J. O. (1990). The effect of delayed pushing in the second stage of labor with continuous lumbar epidural analgesia. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 68, 291-295.
  • Mayberry, L. J., Hammer, R., Kelly, C., True-Driver, B., & De, A. (1999). Use of delayed pushing with epidural anesthesia: Findings from a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Perinatology, 19, 26-30.
  • Oxford-Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine. (2001). Levels of evidence. Retrieved November 15, 2006, from http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp#levels
  • Peterson, L., & Besuner, P. (1997). Pushing techniques during labor: Issues and controversies. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 26, 719-726.
  • Plunkett, B. A., Lin, A., Wong, C. A., Grobman, W. A., & Peaceman, A. M. (2003). Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural anesthesia. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102, 109-114.
  • Roberts, J. E. (2002). The “push” for evidence: Management of the second stage. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 47, 2-15.
  • Roberts, J. E. (2003). A new understanding of the second stage of labor: Implications for nursing care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 32, 794-801.
  • Rooks, J. P. (1997). Midwifery and childbirth in America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Simpson K. R., & James, D. C. (2005). Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second stage labor on fetal well-being. Nursing Research, 54, 149.
  • Vause, S., Congdon, H. M., & Thornton, J. G. (1998). Immediate and delayed pushing in the second stage of labour for nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: A randomized controlled trial. BJOG, 105, 186-188.