SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, D., & van Dyck, P. (2006). A vision of the future of newborn screening. Pediatrics, 117(5 pt 2), S350S354.
  • Botkin, J., Clayton, E., Fost, N., Burke, W., Murray, T., Baily, M., … Ross, L. (2006). Newborn screening technology: Proceed with caution. Pediatrics, 117, 923929.
  • Brunger, J., Murray, G., O'Riordan, M., Matthews, A., Smith, R., & Robin, N. (2000). Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67, 16211625.
  • Campbell, E., & Ross, L. (2003). Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. American Journal of Public Health, 120A, 209214.
  • Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders. (2010). Newborn screening in Canada status report – Updated Nov 11, 2010. Retrieved from http://raredisorders.ca/documents/CanadaNBSstatusupdatedNov.112010.pdf
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155159.
  • Collins, F., & McKusick, V. (2001). Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 540544.
  • Clayton, E. (2005). Talking with parents before newborn screening. Journal of Pediatrics, 147, S26S29.
  • Etchegary, H., Cappelli, M., Potter, B., Vloet, M., Graham, I., Walker, M., & Wilson, B. (2010). Attitude and knowledge about genetics and genetic testing. Public Health Genomics, 13, 8088.
  • Etchegary, H., Dicks, E., Green, J., Hodgkinson, K., Pullman, D., & Parfrey, P. (2011). Interest in newborn genetic testing: A survey of prospective parents and the general public. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1089/gtmb.2011.0221
  • Etchegary, H., Potter, B., Howley, H., Cappelli, M., Coyle, D., Graham, I., … Wilson, B. (2008). The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening decisions. Genetic Testing, 12(1), 115124.
  • Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 5774.
  • Evans, J., Skrzynia, C., & Burke, W. (2001). The complexities of predictive genetic testing. British Medical Journal, 322, 10521056.
  • Hasegawa, L., Fergus, K., Ojeda, N., & Au, S. (2011). Parental attitudes toward ethical and social issues surrounding the expansion of newborn screening using new technologies. Public Health Genomics, 14, 298306.
  • Holtzman, N., & Watson, M. (1998). Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States: Final report of the task force on genetic testing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Human Genetics Commission. (2001). Public attitudes to human genetic information. Retrieved from http://www.hgc.gov.uk/UploadDocs/DocPub/Document/morigeneticattitudes.pdf
  • Lipstein, E., Nabi, E., Perrin, J., Luff, D., Browning, M., & Kuhlthau, K. (2010). Parents’ decision-making in newborn screening: Opinions, choices and information needs. Pediatrics, 126(4), 696704.
  • Morren, M., Rijken, M., Baanders, A., & Bensing, J. (2007). Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 197204.
  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (1993). Genetic screening: Ethical issues. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/genetic-screening
  • Plass, A., van El, C., Pieters, T., & Cornel, M. (2010). Neonatal screening for treatable and untreatable disorders: Prospective parents’ opinions. Pediatrics, 125, e99e106.
  • Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data.British Medical Journal, 320, 114116.
  • Potter, B., Avard, D., Entwistle, V., Kennedy, C., Chakraborty, P., McGuire, M., & Wilson, B. (2009). Ethical, legal and social issues in health technology assessment for prenatal/perceptional and newborn screening: A workshop report. Public Health Genomics, 12, 410.
  • Potter, B., O'Reilly, N., Etchegary, H., Graham, I., Howley, H., Walker, M., … Wilson, B. (2008). Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: Findings from a qualitative study. Health Expectations, 11(4), 355-365.
  • Quinlivan, J., & Suriadi, C. (2006). Attitudes of new mothers towards genetics and newborn screening. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 27(1), 6772.
  • Rahman, P., Jones, A., Curtis, J., Bartlett, S., Peddle, L., Fernandez, B., & Freimer, N. (2003). The Newfoundland population: A unique resource for genetic investigation of complex diseases. Human Molecular Genetics, 12, R167R172.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334340.
  • Tluczek, A., Orland, K., Nick, S., & Brown, R. (2009). Newborn screening: An appeal for improved parent education. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 23(4), 326334.
  • Watson, M., Mann, M., Lloyd-Puryear, M., Rinaldo, P., Howell, R., & the American College of Medical Genetics Newborn Screening Expert Group. (2006). Newborn screening: Toward a uniform screening panel and system – Executive summary. Pediatrics, 117, S296S307.
  • Wilson, J., & Junger, G. (1968). Principles and practice of screening for disease (Public health papers), Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  • Wilson, K., Kennedy, S., Potter, B., Geraghty, M., & Chakraborty, P. (2010). Developing a national newborn screening strategy for Canada. Health Law Review, 18(2), 3139.