The author reports no conflict of interest or relevant financial relationships.
Treatment Fidelity Instrument to Measure a Brief Opportunistic Intervention for Prenatal Substance Use
Version of Record online: 2 OCT 2012
© 2012 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing
Volume 41, Issue 6, pages 809–820, November/December 2012
How to Cite
Torrey, A. R. (2012), Treatment Fidelity Instrument to Measure a Brief Opportunistic Intervention for Prenatal Substance Use. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 41: 809–820. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01413.x
- Issue online: 26 NOV 2012
- Version of Record online: 2 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: JUN 2012
- Association of Women's Health, Obstetric
- Neonatal Nurses
- brief intervention;
- instrument development;
- substance abuse;
- treatment fidelity
To develop and psychometrically evaluate an instrument designed to measure the treatment fidelity associated with implementation of the I Am Concerned (IAC) brief opportunistic intervention by frontline, prenatal, primary care staff.
A methodologic approach framed development of the IAC Treatment Fidelity Instrument in a six-phase protocol.
A simulated prenatal clinic with standardized patients portraying substance-using pregnant women.
Prenatal, primary care, frontline staff (N = 6), experienced in IAC implementation.
Following development of the IAC treatment fidelity instrument, independent raters used the instrument to evaluate audio recordings (N = 49) of frontline staff implementing the IAC brief opportunistic intervention with standardized patients representing substance-using pregnant women.
Psychometric analysis provided evidence of content validity. Intraclass correlation coefficients calculated for inter-rater reliability were satisfactory for subscales (0.64) and (0.62) and ranged from −0.07 to 0.81 for individual items. Internal consistency alpha coefficients were satisfactory for the total scale (0.72) and lower than acceptable for adherence (0.54) and competence (0.56) subscales. Overall high rater percentage agreement and negatively skewed ratings distribution indicated reliability results were paradoxically low due to the base rate problem.
Results support revision and ongoing testing of the IAC treatment fidelity instrument. The impact on reliability statistics exerted by this study's skewed data distribution has implications for nursing research as low variance can be anticipated when measuring care provided to homogenous patient populations. It is important to recognize the resulting influence on inter-rater agreement to avoid making inaccurate interpretations about the reliability of an instrument's measurements.