Dehydration and Orthostatic Vital Signs in Women with Hyperemesis Gravidarum

Authors

  • David R. Johnson MD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM
    2. Division of Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR
      University of New Mexico Department of Emergency Medicine Ambulatory Care Center, 4W Albuquerque, NM 87131
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Daniel Douglas MD,

    1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM
    2. Division of Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mark Hauswald MD,

    1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM
    2. Division of Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dan Tandberg MD

    1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM
    2. Division of Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR
    Search for more papers by this author

University of New Mexico Department of Emergency Medicine Ambulatory Care Center, 4W Albuquerque, NM 87131

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To assess the hydration status of women presenting to an ED with hyperemesis gravidarum and to determine whether clinically relevant changes in orthostatic vital signs occur.

Methods: A convenience sample of 23 pregnant women who had hyperemesis gravidarum, with each patient serving as her own control. The study took place in the ED observation unit of an urban teaching hospital. Women who had pregnancies of ≤16 weeks' gestation who had been vomiting for at least 24 hours were included. Supine and standing pulse rates and blood pressures (BPs) were measured sequentially after 5 minutes in each position. Patient weight and urine specific gravity (SG) also were recorded. After 6 L of lactated Ringer's solution was infused over a 12-hour period, the same measurements were repeated. Pre- and posthydration changes were analyzed using the paired t-test.

Results: The mean treatment weight gain as a percentage of the total body weight was 5.6% ± 2.2% (mean ± SD). The urine SG decreased from 1.027 ± 0.004 to 1.008 ± 0.003 (p < 0.001). The mean change in systolic BP upon assuming the standing position was -8.3 ± 12.7 mm Hg before hydration vs 2.9 ± 7.8 mm Hg after hydration (p < 0.001). The corresponding change in mean diastolic BP was 3.7 ± 10.9 mm Hg before hydration vs 8.6 ± 10.9 mm Hg after hydration (p = 0.12). The mean change in pulse rate upon standing was 26.8 ± 14.5 beats/min before hydration vs 14.5 ± 10.1 beats/min after hydration (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Women who present to the ED with hyperemesis gravidarum are significantly dehydrated and experience measurable improvement in postural pulse rate and systolic BP changes with rehydration. However, the presenting orthostatic changes lack sufficient sensitivity to be effectively used as quantitative screening tests for dehydration.

Ancillary