SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • aged;
  • screening;
  • functional status;
  • reliability;
  • validity;
  • geriatrics

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References

Abstract. Objective: lb determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent criterion validity of a self-report ED screening questionnaire for adverse outcomes in elders.

Methods: A cohort of 1,885 patients aged ≤ 65 years were recruited from the EDs of 4 Montreal hospitals. Patients were excluded if they could not be interviewed because of their clinical status or cognitive impairment and no informant was available. The screening questionnaire, administered in the ED, contained 27 items on social, physical, and mental risk factors, medical history, and use of hospital services, medications, and alcohol. A random sample of 404 patients were invited to participate in a clinical assessment 1–3 weeks after the ED visit, that included re-administration of the screening questionnaire, and standardized instruments to assess disability, social resources, depression, alcohol use and abuse, and current medications.

Results: Study data were collected from 221 patients (54.7%), of whom 193 were included in the test-retest reliability analyses and 213 in the analyses of concurrent validity. The concordance correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability of the risk factor score was 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.83; n= 193). Several screening questions showed moderately good agreement with the appropriate criterion standard, particularly those on visual and hearing impairment, depression, and use of medications. The best subset of 9 screening questions explained approximately half of the variance in the total disability score.

Conclusions: The screening questionnaire score has good test-retest reliability, but individual screening questions have, at best, modest concurrent validity. The final set of screening questions should be selected based on their predictive validity.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References
  • 1
    Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland DG, Adams J., Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessments: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993; 342: 10326.
  • 2
    Sanders AB. Emergency department utilization by elder persons [commentary]. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3: 6589.
  • 3
    Rubenstein LZ. The emergency department: a useful site for CGA J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 6012.
  • 4
    Currie C., Lawson P., Robertson C., Jones A.. Elderly patients discharged from accident and emergency departments–their dependency and support. Arch Emerg Med 1984; 1: 20513.
  • 5
    Rosenfeld T., Fahey P., Price M., Leeder S.. The fate of elderly patients discharged from the accident and emergency department of a general teaching hospital. Community Health Stud 1990; 14: 36572.
  • 6
    Gerson LW, Rousseau EW, Hogan TM, Bernstein E., Kalbfleisch N.. Multicenter study of case finding in elderly emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 1995; 2: 72934.
  • 7
    Miller DK, Lewis LM, Nork MJ, Morley JE. Controlled trial of a geriatric case-finding and liaison service in an emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 51320.
  • 8
    McCusker J., Healey E., Bellavance F., Connolly B.. Predictors of repeat emergency department visits in the elderly. Acad Emerg Med 1997; 4: 5818.
  • 9
    Bowns I., Challis D., Tong MS. Case finding in elderly people: validation of a postal questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41: 1004.
  • 10
    Freer CB. Consultation-based screening of the elderly in genera] practice: a pilot study. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 37: 4556.
  • 11
    Frederiks CM, Margreet J., TeWierik MJ, Visser A., Stur-mans F.. The functional status and utilization of care of elderly people living at home. J Community Health 1990; 15: 30771.
  • 12
    Hébert R., Bravo G., Korner-Bitensky N., Voyer L.. Predictive validity of a postal questionnaire for screening community-dwelling elderly individuals at risk of functional decline. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 15967.
  • 13
    Kerse N., Clark F.. Case finding in the elderly: a postal questionnaire. N Z Med J 1994; 107: 336.
  • 14
    Pannill FC. A patient-completed screening instrument for functional disability in the elderly. Am J Med 1991; 90: 3207.
  • 15
    Boult C., Dowd B., McCaffrey D., Boult L., Hernandez R., Krulewitch H.. Screening elders for risk of hospital admission. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 8117.
  • 16
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. From items scales. In: Health Measurements Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York , NY : Oxford University Press, 1994, pp 6770.
  • 17
    Pfeiffer E.. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1975; 23: 43341.
  • 18
    Smyer MA, Hofland BF, Jonas EA. Validity study of the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1979; 27: 2639.
  • 19
    Fillenbaum GG. Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults: The Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, pp 34, 143–5.
  • 20
    Hébert R., Carrier R., Bilodeau A.. The functional autonomy measurements system (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Aging 1988; 17: 293302.
  • 21
    Desrosiers J., Bravo G., Hubert R., Dubuc N.. Reliability of the revised functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF) for epidemiological research. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 4026.
  • 22
    Vézina J., Laprise R., Gourgue M., Parenteau P., Fréchette M.. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Geriatric Depression Scale using ROC analyses. Can J Aging, (in press), 1998.
  • 23
    Bourque P., Blanchard L., Vézina J.. Étude psychométrique de l'échelle de dépression gériatrique. (Psychometric study of the Geriatric Depression Scale.) Can J Aging 1990; 9: 34855.
  • 24
    Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1983; 17(1):3749.
  • 25
    Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 1984; 252: 19057.
  • 26
    King M.. At risk drinking among general practice attenders: validation of the CAGE questionnaire. Psychol Med 1986; 16: 2137.
  • 27
    Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Welsh J., Centor RM, Schnoll SH. Screening for drinking disorders in the elderly using the CAGE questionnaire. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 6625.
  • 28
    Jones TV, Lindsey BA, Yount P., Soltys R., Farani-Enayat B.. Alcoholism screening questionnaires: are they valid in elderly medical outpatients J Gen Intern Med 1993; 8: 6748.
  • 29
    Quebec Health and Social Survey, 1993. Gouverne-ment du Québec, Conseil québécois de la recherche sociale.
  • 30
    Lin LI-K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 25568.
  • 31
    Cooper H., Hedges L.. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York , NY : Russell Sage Foundation, 1994, pp 2667.
  • 32
    Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner MH. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Third edition. Homewood , IL : Irwin, 1990, pp 44352.
  • 33
    SAS Institute Inc SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12. Cary NC : SAS Institute Inc., 1997, pp 21946, 1003–28.
  • 34
    Hedges JR, Singal BM, Rousseau EW, et al. Geriatric patient emergency visits. Part II: perceptions of visits by geriatric and younger patients. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 80813.
  • 35
    Lachs MS, Feinstein AR, Cooney LM, et al. A simple procedure for general screening for functional disability in elderly patients. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 699706.
  • 36
    Mahoney J., Drinka TJK, Abler R., et al. Screening for depression: single question versus GDS. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 10068.