Validation of a Verbally Administered Numerical Rating Scale of Acute Pain for Use in the Emergency Department
Article first published online: 8 JAN 2008
Academic Emergency Medicine
Volume 10, Issue 4, pages 390–392, April 2003
How to Cite
Bijur, P. E., Latimer, C. T. and Gallagher, E. J. (2003), Validation of a Verbally Administered Numerical Rating Scale of Acute Pain for Use in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 10: 390–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x
- Issue published online: 8 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 8 JAN 2008
- received June 18, 2002 revision received September 6, 2002 accepted November 1, 2002.
- Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8:1153–7. , , .
- The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. Acad Emerg Med. 1996; 3:142–6. , .
- Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38:633–8. , , .
- The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001; 18:205–7. .
- Comparative study of methods of measuring acute pain intensity in an ED. Am J Emerg Med. 1998; 16:132–6. , , , , .
- A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000; 16:22–8. , , .
- A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994; 56:217–26. , , , .
- Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5:1086–90.
- Percent change in VAS that is clinically significant for pain relief [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9:407. , , , .