SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • heart arrest;
  • survival;
  • sudden death;
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References

Objective: Traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training programs do not target older adults who are most likely to witness private-residence cardiac arrests and do not reliably result in a bystander who is likely to perform CPR in the event of an arrest. This study was performed to compare targeted CPR training programs for older adults (older than 50 years) that 1) increase numbers of CPR-trained bystanders of private-residence cardiac arrest or 2) increase the percentage of trained bystanders of private-residence cardiac arrest who perform CPR. A simultaneous outcome was to estimate the minimal significant survival benefit associated with each of the training programs. Methods: A probabilistic simulation model was developed in Fortran95 that incorporated key out-of-hospital cardiac arrest elements, including witnessed arrests, CPR-trained witness, CPR provision, and impact of CPR on ventricular fibrillation. Input data were derived from published or publicly available data, including a large prospective cohort study of outcomes in Oakland County, MI. Monte Carlo simulation (n= 10,000) and sensitivity analyses (n= 40) were used to assess median and the empiric 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for incremental survival with either intervention. Results: The baseline model, calibrated to the characteristics of the input-data community, established that, for private-residence cardiac arrests, 40.8% of cardiac arrest bystanders were trained in CPR; however, only 25.7% performed CPR. This yielded 4.81% survival (95% CI = 4.72 to 4.89). Modeling the impact on the baseline training level with increased CPR performance among trainees indicated that 75% of private-residence trained bystanders would need to perform CPR in order to reach a minimally significant improvement in survival (5.02%; 95% CI = 4.94 to 5.15). Similarly, targeted CPR training that would result in a significant survival benefit (to 5.01%; 95% CI = 4.93 to 5.09) would require that 70.8% of bystanders be trained. Conclusions: CPR training programs that focus on yielding 75% of trainees who perform CPR in the event of witnessing an arrest would have equivalent results to mass CPR training programs that result in 70% of bystanders being trained in CPR. However, the minimal survival benefit associated with these programs (around 0.2%) may prove either method costly with minimal effect.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References
  • Zheng, ZJ, Croft, JB, Giles, WH, Mensah, GA. Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation. 2001; 104:215863.
  • Swor, RA, Jackson, RE, Tintinalli, JE, Pirrallo, RG. Does advanced age matter in outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in community-dwelling adults? Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7:7628.
  • Swor, RA, Jackson, RE, Walters, BL, Rivera, EJ, Chu, KH. Impact of lay responder actions on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000; 4:3842.
  • Litwin, PE, Eisenberg, MS, Hallstrom, AP, Cummins, RO. The location of collapse and its effect on survival from cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16:78791.
  • Rea, TD, Crouthamel, M, Eisenberg, MS, Becker, LJ, Lima, AR. Temporal patterns in long-term survival after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2003; 108:1196201.
  • Chamberlain, D, Smith, A, Colquhoun, M, Handley, AJ, Kern, KB, Woollard, M. Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support: 2. Comparison of CPR performance and skill retention using either staged instruction or conventional training. Resuscitation. 2001; 50:2737.
  • Valenzuela, TD, Roe, DJ, Nichol, G, Clark, LL, Spaite, DW, Hardman, RG. Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343:12069.
  • Jackson RE, Swor RA. Who gets bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a witnessed arrest? Acad Emerg Med. 1997; 4:5404.
  • Stiell IG, Wells GA, DeMaio VJ et al. Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS Study Phase I results. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33:4450.
  • Brennan RT, Braslow A. Are we training the right people yet? A survey of participants in public cardiopulmonary resuscitation classes. Resuscitation. 1998; 37:215.
  • Chu, KH, May, CR, Clark, MJ, Breeze, KM. CPR training in households of patients with chest pain. Resuscitation. 2003; 57:25768.
  • Richardson ME, Lie KG. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for family members of patients on cardiac rehabilitation programmes in Scotland. Resuscitation. 1999; 40:119.
  • Moser, DK, Dracup, K, Guzy, PM, Taylor, SE, Breu, C. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention in family members of cardiac patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1990; 8:498503.
  • Goldberg, RJ, DeCosimo, D, St Louis, P, Gore, JM, Ockene, JK, Dalen, JE. Physicians' attitudes and practices toward CPR training in family members of patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health. 1985; 75:2813.
  • Goldberg, RJ, Gore, JM, Love, DG, Ockene, JK, Dalen, JE. Layperson CPR—are we training the right people? Ann Emerg Med. 1984; 13:7014.
  • Swor RA, Jackson RE, Compton S et al. Cardiac arrest in private locations: different strategies are needed to improve outcome. Resuscitation. 2003; 58:1716.
  • Ornato JP, McBurnie MA, Nichol G et al. The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial: study design and rationale. Resuscitation. 2003; 56:13547.
  • Jackson RE, Freeman SB. Hemodynamics of cardiac massage. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1983; 1:50113.
  • Valenzuela, TD, Roe, DJ, Cretin, S, Spaite, DW, Larsen, MP. Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interventions: a logistic regression survival model. Circulation. 1997; 96:330813.
  • Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field B et al. Advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:64756.
  • Swor R, Compton S, Farr L et al. Perceived self-efficacy in performing and willingness to learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an elderly population in a suburban community. Am J Crit Care. 2003; 12:6570.
  • Platz, E, Scheatzle, MD, Pepe, PE, Dearwater, SR. Attitudes towards CPR training and performance in family members of patients with heart disease. Resuscitation. 2000; 47:27380.
  • Swor R, Compton S, Vining F et al. A randomized controlled trial of chest compression only CPR for older adults-a pilot study. Resuscitation. 2003; 58:17785.
  • Eisenberg MS, Bergner L, Hallstrom A. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: improved survival with paramedic services. Lancet. 1980; 1:8125.
  • Eisenberg M, Damon S, Mandel L et al. CPR instruction by videotape: results of a community project. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25:198202.
  • Meischke, H, Eisenberg, M, Schaeffer, S, Henwood, DK. The ‘Heart Attack Survival Kit’ project: an intervention designed to increase seniors' intentions to respond appropriately to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Health Educ Res. 2000; 15:31726.
  • Todd, KH, Heron, SL, Thompson, M, Dennis, R, O'Connor, J, Kellermann, AL. Simple CPR: a randomized, controlled trial of video self-instructional cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in an African American church congregation. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34:7307.