SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    McConnochie KM, Roghmann KJ, Pasternack J, Monroe DJ, Monaco LP. Prediction rules for selective radiographic assessment of extremity injuries in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1990; 86:4557.
  • 2
    Vargish T, Clarke WR, Young RA, Jensen A. The ankle injury-indications for the selective use of x-rays. Injury. 1983; 14:50712.
  • 3
    Clark KD, Tanner S. Evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003; 19:738.
  • 4
    Libetta C, Burke D, Brennan P, Yassa J. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999; 16:3424.
  • 5
    Al Omar MA, Baldwin GA. Reappraisal of use of x-rays in childhood ankle and midfoot injuries. Emerg Radiol. 2002; 9:8892.
  • 6
    Plint AC, Bulloch B, Osmond MH, et al. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children with ankle injuries. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6:10059.
  • 7
    Cockshott WP, Jenkin JK, Pui M. Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries. CMAJ. 1983; 129:12931.
  • 8
    Gleadhill DN, Thomson JY, Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of x-ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987; 294:9437.
  • 9
    Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993; 269:112732.
  • 10
    Anis AH, Stiell IG, Stewart DG, Laupacis A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 26:4228.
  • 11
    Myers A, Canty K, Nelson T. Are the Ottawa Ankle Rules helpful in ruling out the need for x-ray examination in children? Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90:130911.
  • 12
    Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, Ter Riet G. Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003; 326:41723.
  • 13
    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003; 3:25.
  • 14
    Whiting P, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:9.
  • 15
    Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med. 1993; 12:1293316.
  • 16
    Littenberg B, Moses LE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making. 1993; 13:31321.
  • 17
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7:17788.
  • 18
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J. 2003; 327:55760.
  • 19
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21:153958.
  • 20
    Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58:88293.
  • 21
    Boutis K, Komar L, Jaramillo D, et al. Sensitivity of a clinical examination to predict need for radiography in children with ankle injuries: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001; 358:211821.
  • 22
    Chande VT. Decision rules for roentgenography of children with acute ankle injuries. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995; 149:2558.
  • 23
    Cuello-Garcia C, Ruiz-Flores A, Ramos-Gomez L, Medina-Lopez ME. The Ottawa Ankle Rules: evaluation in a pediatric emergency setting in Mexico. An Pediatr (Barc). 2004; 60:4548.
  • 24
    Dohin B, Lubanziado D. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for varus ankle trauma in children: a prospective study of 160 cases [abstract]. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004; 86-B(Suppl 1):20.
  • 25
    Gilligan B, Burton A, Cortez P, Seaberg D. Application of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a validation study [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7:584.
  • 26
    Karpas A, Hennes H, Walsh-Kelly CM. Utilization of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by nurses in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9:1303.
  • 27
    McBride KL. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. Experience at a community hospital. Can Fam Physician. 1997; 43:45965.
  • 28
    Pacheco-Fowler V, Mankowitz S, Rhadakrishna J, et al. Applicability of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in an urban pediatric population [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6:452.
  • 29
    McGinn TG, Guyatt GH, Wyer PC, Naylor CD, Stiell IG, Richardson WS. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXII: How to use articles about clinical decision rules. JAMA. 2000; 284:7984.
  • 30
    Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. JAMA. 1994; 271:82732.
  • 31
    Stiell I, Wells G, Laupacis A, et al. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. BMJ. 1995; 311:5947.
  • 32
    Dowling SK, Wishart I. The use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: A survey of physicians’ practice patterns. Can J Emerg Med. 2008; 10:255.
  • 33
    Boutis K, Willan AR, Babyn P, Narayanan UG, Alman B, Schuh S. A randomized, controlled trial of a removable brace versus casting in children with low-risk ankle fractures. Pediatrics. 2007; 119:e125663.