Presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians Scientific Assembly, Chicago, IL, October 2008.
A Comparison of GlideScope Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy Intubation in the Emergency Department
Version of Record online: 6 AUG 2009
© 2009 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 9, pages 866–871, September 2009
How to Cite
Platts-Mills, T. F., Campagne, D., Chinnock, B., Snowden, B., Glickman, L. T. and Hendey, G. W. (2009), A Comparison of GlideScope Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy Intubation in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16: 866–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00492.x
No funding or support was received for this study, and none of the authors have a relationship with the maker of the device studied.
A related commentary appears on page 908.
- Issue online: 1 SEP 2009
- Version of Record online: 6 AUG 2009
- Received September 14, 2008; revisions received January 11 and April 9, 2009; accepted May 10, 2009.
- 6Does a new video laryngoscope (GlideScope) provide better glottic exposure? Acta Anesthesiology [Taiwan]. 2005; 43:147–51., , , et al.