Presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting, Baltimore, MD, May 2009.
Telesimulation: An Innovative and Effective Tool for Teaching Novel Intraosseous Insertion Techniques in Developing Countries
Version of Record online: 15 APR 2011
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 4, pages 420–427, April 2011
How to Cite
Mikrogianakis, A., Kam, A., Silver, S., Bakanisi, B., Henao, O., Okrainec, A. and Azzie, G. (2011), Telesimulation: An Innovative and Effective Tool for Teaching Novel Intraosseous Insertion Techniques in Developing Countries. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18: 420–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01038.x
Vidacare Corporation donated the EZ-IO equipment used for this educational project to the Princess Marina Hospital in Botswana.
Supervising Editor: Richard L. Lammers, MD.
- Issue online: 15 APR 2011
- Version of Record online: 15 APR 2011
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2011; 18:420–427 © 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Objectives: Telesimulation is a novel concept coupling the principles of simulation with remote Internet access to teach procedural skills. This study’s objective was to determine if telesimulation could be used by pediatricians in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, to teach a relatively new intraosseous (IO) insertion technique to physicians in Africa.
Methods: One simulator was located in Toronto and the other in Gaborone, Botswana. Instructors and trainees could see one another, see inside each other’s simulators, and communicate in real time. Learner’s opinions and skills were evaluated. Before and after the curriculum, physicians completed a self-assessment questionnaire, a multiple-choice test, and during session 3, a demonstration of competence using an IO infusion system was timed and scored locally and via the Internet.
Results: Twenty-two physicians participated. The scores on the pretest ranged from 1 to 12 out of 15. The range of scores on the posttest was 10 to 15 out of 15. The mean (±SD) score on pre- and post–multiple choice testing increased by +5 (±2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] for mean difference = 3.92 to 6.35). Based on McNemar’s chi-square test, physicians reported a significant improvement in their comfort and knowledge inserting IO needles (p < 0.01), familiarity with the EZ-IO infusion system (p < 0.01), and knowledge handling the IO equipment (p < 0.01). Postintervention, all physicians reported that telesimulation teaching was a worthwhile experience, and 95% felt more prepared to manage pediatric resuscitation. There was no evidence of a difference in scoring or timing of IO insertion tasks whether measured locally or remotely (mean ± SD score difference = −0.11 ± 1.22 [95% CI = −0.66 to 0.43]; mean ± sd time difference = 0.01 ± 0.15 seconds [95% CI = −0.06 to 0.08 seconds]).
Conclusions: Telesimulation is a novel method for teaching procedural skills. The session improved physicians’ knowledge, self-reported confidence, and comfort level in inserting the IO needle. Accurate scoring is possible via the Internet. This modality offers potential for teaching other procedural skills over distances.