SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.
  • 2
    Da’ve D. Benefits and barriers to EMR implementation. Caring. 2004; 23:501.
  • 3
    Walsh SH. The clinician’s perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. BMJ. 2004; 328:11847.
  • 4
    Clayton PD, Narus SP, Bowes WA, et al. Physician use of electronic medical records: issues and successes with direct data entry and physician productivity. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:1415.
  • 5
    Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005; 330:7659.
  • 6
    Goldfinch S. Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Admin Rev. 2007; 67:91729.
  • 7
    Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293:122338.
  • 8
    Aarts J, Berg M. Same systems, different outcomes -- comparing the implementation of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals. Methods Inf Med. 2005; 45:5361.
  • 9
    Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11:10412.
  • 10
    Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 76(Suppl 1):S217.
  • 11
    Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360:162838.
  • 12
    Kaplan B. The medical computing “lag”: perceptions of barriers to the application of computers to medicine. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1987; 3:12336.
  • 13
    ACEP. Emergency Department Crowding: High-impact Solutions. Available at: http://www.acep.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=50026. Accessed Feb 8, 2011.
  • 14
    Institute of Medicine. Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the U.S. Health System. Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
  • 15
    Fairbanks RJ, Caplan S. Poor interface design and lack of usability testing facilitate medical error. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004; 30:57984.
  • 16
    Fairbanks RJ, Guarrera TK, Karn KS, et al. Interface design characteristics of a popular emergency department information system. Paper presented at 52nd Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting. New York, NY: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2008, pp 77882.
  • 17
    Fairbanks RJ, Guarrera TK, Karn KS, Caplan SH, Shah MN, Wears RL. Use error hazards from a popular emergency department information system. Paper presented at Usability Professionals Association 2008 International Conference. Baltimore, MD: 1620 June 2008.
  • 18
    Guerrera TK, Fairbanks RJ, Karn KS, et al. Usability evaluation of an emergency department information system [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15:S278.
  • 19
    Handler JA, Adams JG, Feied CF, et al. Emergency medicine information technology consensus conference: executive summary. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11:11123.
  • 20
    American College of Emergency Physicians. Emergency department information systems: primer for emergency physicians, nurses, and IT professionals. April 15, 2009.
  • 21
    Bernstein S, Aronsky D, Duseja R, et al. The effect of ED crowding on clinically-oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16:110.
  • 22
    Institute of Safe Medication Practices. Safety still compromised by computer weaknesses. ISMP Med Safe Alert. 2005; 10:12.
  • 23
    Institute of Safe Medication Practices. Double keybounce and double keying errors. ISMP Medication Safety Alert. 2006; 11:12.
  • 24
    Associated Press. Veterans Given Wrong Drug Doses Due to Glitch. Available at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28655104. Accessed Feb 8, 2011.
  • 25
    Ammenwerth E, Shaw NT. Bad health informatics can kill--is evaluation the answer? Methods Inf Med. 2005; 44:13.
  • 26
    Ammenwerth E, Talmon J, Ash JS, et al. Impact of CPOE on mortality rates--contradictory findings, important messages. Methods Inf Med. 2006; 45:58693.
  • 27
    Anonymous. The hazards of alarm overload. Keeping excessive physiologic monitoring alarms from impeding care. Health Devices. 2007; 36:7383.
  • 28
    Bainbridge L. Ironies of automation: increasing levels of automation can increase, rather than decrease, the problems of supporting the human operator. In: RasmussenJ, DuncanK, LeplatJ (eds). New Technology and Human Error. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1987, pp 27683.
  • 29
    Barber B. Security, safety and quality in health information systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003; 96:917.
  • 30
    Carvel J. Computer virus strikes at three London hospitals. London, UK: The Guardian, Nov 19, 2008, p 17.
  • 31
    Casey S. Set Phasers on Stun - And Other True Tales of Design, Technology, and Human Error. 2nd ed. New York: Aegean Publishing Company; 1998.
  • 32
    DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, et al. Electronic health records’ limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff. 2010; 29:63946.
  • 33
    Pennathur PR, Bisantz AM, Fairbanks RJ, Perry SJ, Zwemer FL, Wears RL. Assessing the impact of computerization on work practice: information technology in emergency departments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting. Baltimore, MD: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2007, p 377381.
  • 34
    Perry SJ, Wears RL, Cook RI. The role of automation in complex system failures. J Patient Safe. 2005; 1:5661.
  • 35
    Silverstein S. Contemporary Issues in Medical Informatics: Common Examples of Healthcare Information Technical Difficulties. Available at: http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/faculty/ssilverstein/cases/?loc=cases. Accessed Feb 9, 2011.
  • 36
    Wears R, Leveson NG. “Safeware”: safety-critical computing and healthcare information technology. In: HenriksenK, BattlesJB, KeyesMA, GradymL, (eds.). Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches. AHRQ Publication No. 08-0034-4 ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008, pp 110.
  • 37
    Wears RL, Berg M. Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. JAMA. 2005; 293:12613.
  • 38
    Wears RL, Perry SJ, Wilson S, Galliers J, Fone J. Emergency department status boards: user-evolved artefacts for inter- and intra-group coordination. Cognition Technol Work. 2007; 9:16370.
  • 39
    Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144:74252.
  • 40
    Metzger J, Welebob E, Bates DW, Lipsitz S, Classen DC. Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry. Health Aff. 2010; 29:65563.
  • 41
    Rankin SB, White BA. Healthcare IT and Connecticut’s acute-care hospital. An analysis of trends, barriers, impacts and perspectives. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2008; 22:5763.
  • 42
    Parente ST, McCullough JS. Health information technology and patient safety: evidence from panel data. Health Aff. 2009; 28:35760.
  • 43
    Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, Karsh BT. Workarounds to barcode administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15:40823.
  • 44
    Barnard A. Hospital Computer Crash a Lesson to the Industry. Boston, MA: Boston Globe, Nov 19, 2002, p B1.
  • 45
    The King’s Fund Library Database. Report of the Inquiry Committee into the Computer Software Error in Downs Syndrome Screening. Available at: http://kingsfund.koha-ptfs.eu/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=30167. Accessed Feb 9, 2011.
  • 46
    Cook RI, O’Connor MF. Thinking about accidents and systems. In: ManasseHR, ThompsonKK (eds). Medication Safety: A Guide for Healthcare Facilities. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-systems Pharmacists, 2005, pp 7388.
  • 47
    Kuehn BM. IT vulnerabilities highlighted by errors, malfunctions at Veterans’ medical centers. JAMA. 2009; 301:91920.
  • 48
    Burstein D. Canadian Medical Tests Give Reversed Results. Available at: http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/23.19.html#subj2. Accessed Feb 8, 2011.
  • 49
    Lehmann CU, Kim GR. Computerized provider order entry and patient safety. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2006; 53:116984.
  • 50
    Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005; 116:150612.
  • 51
    Upperman JS, Staley P, Friend K, et al. The impact of hospitalwide computerized physician order entry on medical errors in a pediatric hospital. J Ped Surg. 2005; 40:579.
  • 52
    Khajouei R, Jaspers MW. CPOE system design aspects and their qualitative effect on usability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008; 136:30914.
  • 53
    Feied CF, Smith MS, Handler JA. Keynote address: medical informatics and emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11:111826.
  • 54
    Wears RL, Perry SJ. Status boards in accident & emergency departments: support for shared cognition. Theoret Issues Ergonom Sci. 2007; 8:37180.
  • 55
    Wears RL, Perry SJ, Shapiro M, Beach C, Behara R. A comparison of manual and electronic status boards in the emergency department: what’s gained and what’s lost? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting. Denver, CO: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2003, pp 14203.
  • 56
    Sunm M, Bisantz AM, Fairbanks RJ. Interpersonal communication and public display tools in the emergency department. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium. Charlottesville, VA: IEEE, 2005, pp 24952.
  • 57
    Wears RL, Bisantz AM, Perry SJ, Fairbanks RJ. Consequences of technical change in cognitive artefacts for managing complex work. In: CarayonP, RobertsonM, KlienerB, HoonakkerPL (eds.). Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management - VIII. Santa Monica, CA: IEA Press, 2005, pp 31722.
  • 58
    Bisantz AM, Fairbanks RJ, Sunm M. Emergency department communication patterns and IT design. In: Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research Conference. Orlando, FL, 2006.
  • 59
    Pennathur PR, Bisantz AM, Fairbanks RJ, et al. Cognitive artifacts in transition: an analysis of information content changes between manual and electronic patient tracking systems. Paper presented at Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting. New York, NY: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2008, p 3637.
  • 60
    Handler JA, Gillam M, Sanders AB, Klasco R. Defining, identifying, and measuring error in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7:11838.
  • 61
    Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005; 293:1197203.
  • 62
    Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360:14779.
  • 63
  • 64
    American College of Emergency Physicians. Meaningful use: what’s the ED got to do with it? Emergency Medical Informatics Section Newsletter. Available at: http://www.acep.org/ACEPmembership.aspx?id=49215#story5. Accessed Feb 8, 2011.
  • 65
    Vicente KJ. Cognitive Work Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
  • 66
    Cheung DS, Kelly JJ, Beach C, et al. Improving handoffs in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55:17180.
  • 67
    Patterson ES, Wears RL. Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010; 36:5261.
  • 68
    Leveson NG. Safeware: System Safety and Computers. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
  • 69
    Storey N. Safety-Critical Computer Systems. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited, 1996.
  • 70
    International Standards Organization. Health Informatics -- Application of Clinical Risk Management to the Manufacture of Health Software. International Standards Organization; ISO/TS 29321:2008. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45411. Accessed Feb 8, 2011.
  • 71
    International Standards Organization. Health Informatics -- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Risk Relating to the Deployment and Use of Health Software Systems. International Standards Organization; ISO/TS 29322:2008(E). Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45412. Accessed Feb 8, 2011.
  • 72
    Aarts J, Berg M. A tale of two hospitals: a sociotechnical appraisal of the introduction of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals. Medinfo. 2004; 11(Pt 2):9991002.
  • 73
    Greenhalgh T, Potts HW, Wong G, Bark P, Swinglehurst D. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Q. 2009; 87:72988.
  • 74
    Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd, 1997, p 8.