Funding for this conference was made possible (in part) by 1R13HS018114-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Enhancing Systems to Improve the Management of Acute, Unscheduled Care
Article first published online: 15 JUN 2011
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 6, pages e39–e44, June 2011
How to Cite
Braithwaite, S. A., Pines, J. M., Asplin, B. R. and Epstein, S. K. (2011), Enhancing Systems to Improve the Management of Acute, Unscheduled Care. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18: e39–e44. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01080.x
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Supervising Editor: Mark Hauswald, MD, PhD.
- Issue published online: 15 JUN 2011
- Article first published online: 15 JUN 2011
- Received January 9, 2011; revision received March 7, 2011; accepted March 9, 2011.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2011; 18:e39–e44 © 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
For acutely ill patients, health care services are available in many different settings, including hospital-based emergency departments (EDs), retail clinics, federally qualified health centers, and outpatient clinics. Certain conditions are the sole domain of particular settings: stabilization of critically ill patients can typically only be provided in EDs. By contrast, many conditions that do not require hospital resources, such as advanced radiography, admission, and same-day consultation can often be managed in clinic settings. Because clinics are generally not open nights, and often not on weekends or holidays, the ED remains the only option for face-to-face medical care during these times. For patients who can be managed in either setting, there are many open research questions about which is the best setting, because these venues differ in terms of access, costs of care, and potentially, quality. Consideration of these patients must be risk-adjusted, as patients may self-select a venue for care based upon perceived acuity. We present a research agenda for acute, unscheduled care in the United States developed in conjunction with an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality–funded conference hosted by the American College of Emergency Physicians in October 2009, titled “Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Emergency Care Across the Continuum: A Systems Approach.” Given the possible increase in ED utilization over the next several years as more people become insured, understanding differences in cost, quality, and access for conditions that may be treated in EDs or clinic settings will be vital in guiding national health policy.