• 1
    Cassidy J, Carroll L, Peloso P, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004; (43 Suppl ):2860.
  • 2
    McCaig LF, Ly N. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2002; 327:127.
  • 3
    Yates PJ, Williams WH, Harris A, Round A, Jenkins R. An epidemiological study of head injuries in a UK population attending an emergency department. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; 77:699701.
  • 4
    Rockswold GL, Leonard PR, Nagib MG. Analysis of management in thirty-three closed head injury patients who “talked and deteriorated”. Neurosurgery. 1987; 21:515.
  • 5
    Galbraith S. Misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis in traumatic intracranial haematoma. BMJ. 1976; 1:14389.
  • 6
    Fabbri A, Servadei F, Marchesini G, et al. Prospective validation of a proposal for diagnosis and management of patients attending the emergency department for mild head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75:4106.
  • 7
    Miller EC, Holmes JF, Derlet RW. Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients. J Emerg Med. 1997; 15:4537.
  • 8
    Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Herbert M, et al.; NEXUS II Investigators. Developing a decision instrument to guide computed tomographic imaging of blunt head injury patients. J Trauma. 2005; 59:9549.
  • 9
    Stein SC, Ross SE. Minor head injury: a proposed strategy for emergency management. Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22:11936.
  • 10
    Shackford SR, Wald SL, Ross SE, et al. The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma. 1992; 33:38594.
  • 11
    Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001; 357:13916.
  • 12
    Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. NEJM. 2000; 343:1005.
  • 13
    WHO-ICECI Coordination and Maintenance Group. Testing ICECI: Review and Filed Testing. Amsterdam: Consumer Safety Institute; September 2004. Available at: Accessed Mar 28, 2011.
  • 14
    Stiell IG, Lesiuk H, Vandemheen K, et al. Obtaining consensus for the definition of “clinically important” brain injury in the CCC Study [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7:572.
  • 15
    Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, et al. External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005; 294:151925.
  • 16
    Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005; 294:15118.
  • 17
    Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, et al. Minor head injury: guidelines for the use of CT – a multicenter validation study. Radiology. 2007; 245:8318.
  • 18
    Smits M, Dippel DW, Nederkoorn PJ, et al. Minor head injury: CT-based strategies for management--a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 2010; 254:53240.
  • 19
    Stein SC, Burnett MG, Glick HA. Indications for CT scanning in mild traumatic brain injury: a cost-effective study. J Trauma 2006; 61:55866.
  • 20
    Boyle A, Santarius L, Maimaris C. Evaluation of the impact of the Canadian CT head rule on British practice. Emerg Med J. 2004; 21:4268.
  • 21
    Sultan HY, Boyle A, Pereira M, Antoun N, Maimaris C. Application of the Canadian CT Head Rule in managing minor head injuries in a UK emergency department: implications for the implementation of the NICE guidelines. Emerg Med J. 2004; 21:4205.