• 1
    Canadian Institute for Health Information. Understanding Emergency Department Wait Times. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2005.
  • 2
    Institute of Medicine. The Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 48:11520.
  • 3
    Richardson L, Hwang U. Access to care: a review of the emergency medicine literature. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8:10306.
  • 4
    Grumbach K, Keane D, Bindman A. Primary care and public emergency department overcrowding. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83:3728.
  • 5
    Torrens P. Variation among emergency room populations: a comparison of four hospitals in New York City. Med Care. 1970; 8:6075.
  • 6
    Pane G, Farner M, Salness K. Health care access problems of medically indigent emergency department walk-in patients. Ann Emerg Med. 1991; 20:7303.
  • 7
    Weber E, Showstack J, Hunt K, Colby D, Callaham M. Does lack of a usual source of care or health insurance increase the likelihood of an emergency department visit? Results of a national population-based study. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45:412.
  • 8
    Zuckerman S, Shen YC. Characteristics of occasional and frequent emergency department users: do insurance coverage and access to care matter? Med Care. 2004; 42:17682.
  • 9
    Madore O. The Canada Health Act: Overview and Options? Available at: Accessed May 23, 2011.
  • 10
    HealthCanada. 2003 First Ministers’ Accord on Health Care Renewal. Available at: Accessed May 23, 2011.
  • 11
    Glazier RH, Tepper J, Agha M, Moineddin R. Primary care in disadvantaged populations. In: JaakkimainenL, UpshurR, SchultzS, eds. Primary Care in Ontario. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2006.
  • 12
    Winkleby M, Jatulis D, Frank E, Fortmann S. Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82:81620.
  • 13
    Schoen C, Doty M. Inequities in access to medical care in five countries: findings from the 2001 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey. Health Policy. 2004; 67:30922.
  • 14
    College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. 2005 Survey of Ontario’s Physicians: Access Challenges Ahead. Toronto: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2006.
  • 15
    Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, 1993.
  • 16
    McHomey C, Ware J, Raczek A. The MOS 36-item short-form health status survey (SF-36) II: psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993; 31:24763.
  • 17
    Grafstein E, Innes G, Westman J, Christenson J, Thorne A. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. Can J Emerg Med. 2003; 5:3239.
  • 18
    Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS): Cycle 1.1: extending the wealth of health data in Canada. Available at: Accessed May 23, 2011.
  • 19
    World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Tenth Revision, 2nd edn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2004.
  • 20
    The Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix Adjustment System. Available at: Accessed May 23, 2011.
  • 21
    Reid R, MacWilliam L, Verhulst L, Roos N, Atkinson M. Performance of the ACG case-mix system in two Canadian provinces. Med Care. 2001; 39:8699.
  • 22
    Starfield B, Weiner J, Murla P. Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management. Health Serv Res. 1991; 26:5374.
  • 23
    Weiner J, Starfield B, Steinwachs D, Abramson J. Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix. Med Care. 1991; 29:45272.
  • 24
    Ontario College of Family Physicians. Where Have All the Family Doctors Gone? Toronto, Ontario: Ontario College of Family Physicians, 2001.
  • 25
    Schultz SE, Tepper J, Guttman A, Jaakkimainen L. Characteristics of primary care practice. In: JaakkimainenL, UpshurR, Klein-GeltinkJE, et al., eds. Primary Care in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2006.
  • 26
    Steele S, Anstett D, Milne WK. Rural emergency department use by CTAS IV and V patients. Can J Emerg Med. 2008; 10:20914.
  • 27
    Field S, Lantz A. Emergency department use by CTAS Levels IV and V patients. Can J Emerg Med. 2006; 8:31722.
  • 28
    Glazier RH, Redelmeier DA. Building the patient-centered medical home in Ontario. JAMA. 2010; 303:21867.
  • 29
    Shah SM, Cook DG. Socio-economic determinants of casualty and NHS Direct use. J Public Health (Oxf). 2008; 30:7581.
  • 30
    Marmot M, Smith G, Stansfeld S, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II Study. Lancet. 1991; 337:138793.
  • 31
    Tsai JC, Liang YW, Pearson WS. Utilization of emergency department in patients with non-urgent medical problems: patient preference and emergency department convenience. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010; 109:53342.
  • 32
    Backman AS, Blomqvist P, Lagerlund M, Carlsson-Holm E, Adami J. Characteristics of non-urgent patients. Cross-sectional study of emergency department and primary care patients. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008; 26:1817.
  • 33
    Pollock D. Barriers to health care access: what counts and who’s counting? Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8:10168.
  • 34
    Schull M, Kiss A, Szalai J. The effect of low-complexity patients on emergency department waiting times. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 49:25764.
  • 35
    Asplin B, Magid D. If you want to fix crowding, start by fixing your hospital. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 49:2734.