SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Bulechek GM, McCloskey JC, Titler MG, Denehey JA. Report on the NIC Project. Nursing interventions used in practice. Am J Nurs. 1994; 94:5964,66.
  • 2
    Singer AJ, Richman PB, Kowalska A, Thode HC. Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33:6528.
  • 3
    Jacobson AF, Winslow EH. Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung. 2005; 34:34559.
  • 4
    Liniger RA. Pediatric peripheral IV insertion success rates. Pediatr Nurs. 2003; 29:3514.
  • 5
    Frey AM. Success rates for peripheral i.v. insertion in a children’s hospital. Financial implications. J Intraven Nurs. 1998; 21:1605.
  • 6
    Cummings EA, Reid GJ, Finley GA, McGrath PJ, Ritchie JA. Prevalence and source of pain in pediatric inpatients. Pain. 1996; 68:2531.
  • 7
    Skarbek-Borowska S, Becker BM, Baker E, Lovegren K, Minugh AM. Brief focal ultrasound with topical anesthetic decreases the pain of IV placement in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22:33945.
  • 8
    Jacobson A. Intradermal normal saline solution, self-selected music, and insertion difficulty effects on intravenous insertion pain. Heart Lung. 1999; 28:11422.
  • 9
    Miyake RK, Zeman HD, Duarte FH, et al. Vein imaging: a new method of near infrared imaging, where a processed image is projected onto the skin for the enhancement of vein treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32:10318.
  • 10
    Hess HA. A biomedical device to improve pediatric vascular access success. Pediatr Nurs. 21; 36:25963.
  • 11
    Skarbek-Borowska S, Becker BM, Baker E, Lovegren K, Minugh AM. Brief focal ultrasound with topical anesthetic decreases the pain of IV placement in children. Presented at Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Scientific Meetings in NYC May 2005 and the Pediatric Academic Society Meetings, Washington, DC, May 2005.
  • 12
    Oliver J, Johnson WD, Marshall GD. The logarithmic transformation and the geometric mean in reporting experimental IgE results: what are they and when and why to use them? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008; 100:3337.
  • 13
    Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in the visual analog pain scales vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5:108690.
  • 14
    Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001; 18:2057.
  • 15
    Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37:2831.