Working group participants were as follows (in alphabetical order): James Amsterdam, Hany Atallah, Chandra Aubin, John Becher, Theodore Christopher, Karen Cosby, Ru Ding, Heather Farley, Christina Gindele, Jason Hack, Kurt Isenberger Ray Johnson, John Kelly, Rahul Khare, Erik Kulstad, Lawrence Melniker, Ryan L. Mutter, Howard Ovens, Jesse M. Pines, Peter Samuel, Caitlin Schaninger, Robert Shesser, Dell Simmons, Jeffrey Smith, Robert Solomon, Suzanne Stone-Griffith, Michael J. Ward, Robert Wears, and Lainie Yarris.
Consensus Breakout Session
Achieving Efficiency in Crowded Emergency Departments: A Research Agenda
Version of Record online: 13 DEC 2011
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine
Special Issue: Proceedings of the 2011 AEM Consenus Conference: Interventions to Assure Quality in the Crowded Emergency Department Guest Editors: James R. Miner, MD Manish N. Shah, MD, MPH
Volume 18, Issue 12, pages 1303–1312, December 2011
How to Cite
Ward, M. J., Farley, H., Khare, R. K., Kulstad, E., Mutter, R. L., Shesser, R. and Stone-Griffith, S. (2011), Achieving Efficiency in Crowded Emergency Departments: A Research Agenda. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18: 1303–1312. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01222.x
Funding for this conference was made possible (in part) by 1R13HS020139-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This issue of Academic Emergency Medicine is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
This paper does not represent the policy of either the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and no official endorsement by AHRQ or DHHS is intended or should be inferred.
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Supervising Editor: James Miner, MD.
- Issue online: 13 DEC 2011
- Version of Record online: 13 DEC 2011
- Received July 11, 2011; revision received July 21, 2011; accepted July 25, 2011.
- 1Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001.
- 2Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RAND, United States. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Identifying, Categorizing, and Evaluating Health Care Efficiency Measures Final Report. AHRQ Publication No. 08-0030. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008.,
- 3National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (U.S.), and National Academies Press (U.S.). Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005., , , ,
- 4Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System. Hospital-based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
- 5American Hospital Association. Trendwatch Chartbook 2010: Trends Affecting Hospitals and Health Systems. Washington, DC: American Hospital Association, 2010.
- 16Quality matters: CMS measures a train wreck for emergency medicine. Emerg Med News. 2011; 33:1, 4,5..
- 17Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2007 National Healthcare Quality Report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.
- 23Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Quality Indicators. Available at: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/. Accessed Sep 2, 2011.
- 32Laboratory turnaround time. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007; 28:179–94..
- 34Cardiac point-of-care testing: impact on emergency department door to disposition time is modified by patient acuity and hospital setting. Point Care. 2011; 10:1–6., , , , .
- 35Patient Safety Authority. Communication of radiograph discrepancies between radiology and emergency departments. PA Patient Saf Advis. 2010; 7:18–22.
- 36Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research. Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2007; 38:1655–711., , , et al.
- 37American College of Cardiology. D2B: An Alliance for Quality. Available at: http://www.d2balliance.org/JoinD2B/tabid/147/Default.aspx. Accessed Sep 2, 2011.
- 38National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Imaging Efficiency Measure Summary. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=26315. Accessed Sep 19, 2011.
- 41What have we learned from the application of stochastic frontier analysis to U.S. hospitals? Med Care Res Rev. 2011; 68:S75–100., .
- 43With physician employment on the rise, new compensation models emerge. Hosp Health Netw. 2010; 84:e10..
- 44Understanding productivity-based incentives. Emerg Phys Mon. Available at: http://www.epmonthly.com/subspecialties/management/understanding-productivity-based-incentives-/. Accessed Sep 2, 2011..
- 65Anonymous. Use simulation to learn results in advance. ED Manag. 1999; 11:69–72.
- 68Testing with simulation before a big move at Women & Infants Hospital. Med Health R I. 2010; 93:145 149–50., , .