This manuscript represents a component of the 2011 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference entitled “Interventions to Assure Quality in the Crowded Emergency Department (ED)” held in Boston, MA.
Practical Implications of Implementing Emergency Department Crowding Interventions: Summary of a Moderated Panel
Article first published online: 13 DEC 2011
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine
Special Issue: Proceedings of the 2011 AEM Consenus Conference: Interventions to Assure Quality in the Crowded Emergency Department Guest Editors: James R. Miner, MD Manish N. Shah, MD, MPH
Volume 18, Issue 12, pages 1278–1282, December 2011
How to Cite
Pines, J. M., Pilgrim, R. L., Schneider, S. M., Siegel, B. and Viccellio, P. (2011), Practical Implications of Implementing Emergency Department Crowding Interventions: Summary of a Moderated Panel. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18: 1278–1282. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01227.x
Funding for this conference was made possible (in part) by 1R13HS020139-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This issue of Academic Emergency Medicine is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Supervising Editor: James Miner, MD.
- Issue published online: 13 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 13 DEC 2011
- Received July 14, 2011; accepted July 30, 2011.
- 2National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008; 7:1–38., , , .
- 8Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Urgent Matters. Available at: http://www.urgentmatters.org/. Accessed Sep 12, 2011.
- 13Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Media Affairs. Proposals for Improving Quality of Care During Inpatient Stays in Acute Care Hospitals in the Fiscal Year 2011 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/acuteinpatientpps/downloads/FSQ09_IPLTCH11_NPRM041910.pdf. Accessed Sep 7, 2011.
- 14Pay for performance for antibiotic timing in pneumonia: caveat emptor. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006; 32:531–5., , , .