This work was supported in part by grants 1K01HS017957-02 and 1R13 HS 20139-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This issue of Academic Emergency Medicine is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Comparison of Methods for Measuring Crowding and Its Effects on Length of Stay in the Emergency Department
Article first published online: 13 DEC 2011
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine
Special Issue: Proceedings of the 2011 AEM Consenus Conference: Interventions to Assure Quality in the Crowded Emergency Department Guest Editors: James R. Miner, MD Manish N. Shah, MD, MPH
Volume 18, Issue 12, pages 1269–1277, December 2011
How to Cite
McCarthy, M. L., Ding, R., Pines, J. M. and Zeger, S. L. (2011), Comparison of Methods for Measuring Crowding and Its Effects on Length of Stay in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18: 1269–1277. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01232.x
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Supervising Editor: James Miner, MD.
- Issue published online: 13 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 13 DEC 2011
- Received August 11, 2011; accepted August 12, 2011.
- 3General Accounting Office. Hospital Emergency Departments - Crowded Conditions Vary Among Hospitals and Communities. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office; 2003. Report No.: GAO-03-460.
- 17Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1989., .
- 18Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2009., .