• 1
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. National EMS Research Agenda. Available at: Accessed Sep 29, 2011.
  • 2
    Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System. Emergency Medical Services: At the Crossroads. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
  • 3
    Committee for Evaluating Medical Technologies in Clinical Use. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 1985.
  • 4
    Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973; 182:11028.
  • 5
    Chassin MR, Kosecoff J, Solomon DH, et al. How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness. JAMA. 1987; 258:25437.
  • 6
    Eddy DM. Evidence-based medicine: a unified approach. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24:917.
  • 7
    Hakkennes S, Dodd K. Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008; 17:296300.
  • 8
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. National Emergency Medical Services Education Standards. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2009.
  • 9
    Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W, et al. The OPALS major trauma study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ. 2008; 178:114152.
  • 10
    Stiell IG, Spaite DW, Field B, et al. Advanced life support for out-of-hospital respiratory distress. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:215664.
  • 11
    Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field B, et al. Advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:64756.
  • 12
    Eddy DM. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Practice policies--guidelines for methods. JAMA. 1990; 263:183941.
  • 13
    Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1990.
  • 14
    Canadian Prehospital Protocols Group. Evidence Based Prehospital Protocols. Available at: Accessed Nov 17, 2011.
  • 15
    Jensen JL, Petrie DA, Travers AH. The Canadian prehospital evidence-based protocols project: knowledge translation in emergency medical services care. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16:66873.
  • 16
    American Heart Association. Scientific Statements and Practice Guidelines. Available at: Accessed Nov 26, 2011.
  • 17
    Ting HH, Krumholz HM, Bradley EH, et al. Implementation and integration of prehospital ECGs into systems of care for acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2008; 118:106679.
  • 18
    Ollenschlager G, Marshall C, Qureshi S, et al. Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13:45560.
  • 19
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. National EMS Scope of Practice Model. Available at: Accessed Nov 17, 2011.
  • 20
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008; 336:9958.
  • 21
    Detsky AS. Sources of bias for authors of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 2006; 175:1033 1035.
  • 22
    Eichacker PQ, Natanson C, Danner RL. Surviving sepsis--practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:16402.
  • 23
    Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ. 2010; 182:104552.
  • 24
    Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010; 182:E4728.
  • 25
    Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010; 182:E83942.
  • 26
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283:200812.
  • 27
    Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7:e10.
  • 28
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic rand meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6:e1000097 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  • 29
    Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001; 357:11914.
  • 30
    The AGREE Research Trust. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. London, UK: The AGREE Research Trust, 2001.
  • 31
    Verkerk K, Van Veenendaal H, Severens JL, et al. Considered judgment in evidence-based guideline development. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18:3659.
  • 32
    Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh MC, et al. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18:16776.
  • 33
    Gupta S, Bhattacharyya OK, Brouwers MC, et al. Canadian Thoracic Society: presenting a new process for clinical practice guideline production. Can Respir J. 2009; 16:e628.
  • 34
    Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008; 300:4368.
  • 35
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336:9246.
  • 36
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ. 2008; 337:a744.
  • 37
    Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004; 4:e38.
  • 38
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336:104951.
  • 39
    Chong CA, Chen IJ, Naglie G, Krahn MD. How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24:97782.
  • 40
    Drazen JM, de Leeuw PW, Laine C, et al. Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. CMAJ. 2010; 182:e425.
  • 41
    Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005; 5:e23.
  • 42
    Hill KM, Lalor EE. How useful is an online tool to facilitate guideline implementation? Feasibility study of using eGLIA by stroke clinicians in Australia. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18:1579.
  • 43
    Rittenberger JC, Beck PW, Paris PM. Errors of omission in the treatment of prehospital chest pain patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005; 9:27.
  • 44
    McVaney KE, Macht M, Colwell CB, Pons PT. Treatment of suspected cardiac ischemia with aspirin by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005; 9:2824.
  • 45
    Figgis K, Slevin O, Cunningham JB. Investigation of paramedics’ compliance with clinical practice guidelines for the management of chest pain. Emerg Med J. 2010; 27:1515.
  • 46
    Franschman G, Peerdeman SM, Greuters S, et al. Prehospital endotracheal intubation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: guidelines versus reality. Resuscitation. 2009; 80:114751.
  • 47
    Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001; 39(8 Suppl 2):II4654.
  • 48
    Mears G, Ornato JP, Dawson DE. Emergency medical services information systems and a future EMS national database. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002; 6:12330.
  • 49
    Spaite DW, Maio R, Garrison HG, et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP) II: developing the foundation and conceptual models for out-of-hospital outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37:65763.
  • 50
    Garrison HG, Maio RF, Spaite DW, et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project III (EMSOP III): the role of risk adjustment in out-of-hospital outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40:7988.
  • 51
    Maio RF, Garrison HG, Spaite DW, et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP) IV: pain measurement in out-of-hospital outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40:1729.
  • 52
    McLean SA, Maio RF, Spaite DW, et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Research: evaluating the effectiveness of prehospital care. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002; 6(2 Suppl):S526.
  • 53
    Maio RF, Garrison HG, Spaite DW, et al. Emergency medical services outcomes project I (EMSOP I): prioritizing conditions for outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33:42332.
  • 54
    Keim SM, Spaite DW, Maio RF, et al. Establishing the scope and methodological approach to out-of-hospital outcomes and effectiveness research. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11:106773.
  • 55
    Keim SM, Spaite DW, Maio RF, et al. Risk adjustment and outcome measures for out-of-hospital respiratory distress. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11:107481.
  • 56
    Lerner EB, Nichol G, Spaite DW, Garrospm HG, Maio RF. A comprehensive framework for determining the cost of an emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 49:30413.