SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Glenn Langenburg, Flore Bochet, Scott Ford, A Report of Statistics from Latent Print Casework, Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 2014, 5, 1-2, 15

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Nikola K.P. Osborne, Sally Woods, Jules Kieser, Rachel Zajac, Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?, Science & Justice, 2014, 54, 4, 267

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Ralph Norman Haber, Lyn Haber, Experimental results of fingerprint comparison validity and reliability: A review and critical analysis, Science & Justice, 2014, 54, 5, 375

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    R. Austin Hicklin, Bradford T. Ulery, JoAnn Buscaglia, Maria Antonia Roberts, In response to Haber and Haber, “Experimental results of fingerprint comparison validity and reliability: A review and critical analysis”, Science & Justice, 2014, 54, 5, 390

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Mark Page, Forensic Testimony, 2014,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Matthew B. Thompson, Jason M. Tangen, Duncan J. McCarthy, Expertise in Fingerprint Identification, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2013, 58, 6
  7. 7
    Joshua Abraham, Christophe Champod, Chris Lennard, Claude Roux, Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: A critical review, Forensic Science International, 2013, 232, 1-3, 131

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Joshua Abraham, Christophe Champod, Chris Lennard, Claude Roux, Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations, Forensic Science International, 2013, 230, 1-3, 87

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Bryan Found, John Ganas, The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework, Science & Justice, 2013, 53, 2, 154

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    K. Inman, N. Rudin, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, 2013,

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    L. Tierney, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, 2013,

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    R.M. Ruth, M. Reznicek, D.M. Schilens, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, 2013,

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Mark Page, Jane Taylor, Matt Blenkin, Context Effects and Observer Bias—Implications for Forensic Odontology, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 57, 1
  14. 14
    James Robertson, Forensic science, an enabler or dis-enabler for criminal investigation?, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 44, 1, 83

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Itiel Dror, Letter to the Editor—Combating Bias: The Next Step in Fighting Cognitive and Psychological Contamination, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 57, 1
  16. 16
    Itiel E. Dror, Kasey Wertheim, Peter Fraser-Mackenzie, Jeff Walajtys, The Impact of Human–Technology Cooperation and Distributed Cognition in Forensic Science: Biasing Effects of AFIS Contextual Information on Human Experts, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 57, 2
  17. 17
    Cedric Neumann, Lee and Gaensslen's Advances in Fingerprint Technology, Third Edition, 2012,

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Virpi Mustonen, Kimmo Himberg, A Novel Approach to the Education of Fingerprint Experts, Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 2011, 2, 1, 28

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    B. T. Ulery, R. A. Hicklin, J. Buscaglia, M. A. Roberts, Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108, 19, 7733

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Itiel E. Dror, Christophe Champod, Glenn Langenburg, David Charlton, Heloise Hunt, Robert Rosenthal, Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: Inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a ‘target’ comparison, Forensic Science International, 2011, 208, 1-3, 10

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Esperanza Gutiérrez-Redomero, Concepción Alonso-Rodríguez, Luis E. Hernández-Hurtado, José L. Rodríguez-Villalba, Distribution of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population, Forensic Science International, 2011, 208, 1-3, 79

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Ira Helsloot, Jelle Groenendaal, Naturalistic Decision Making in Forensic Science: Toward a Better Understanding of Decision Making by Forensic Team Leaders, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 56, 4
  23. 23
    Cedric Neumann, Ismael Mateos-Garcia, Glenn Langenburg, Jennifer Kostroski, James E. Skerrett, Martin Koolen, Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: A field study, Forensic Science International, 2011, 212, 1-3, 32

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Neal Archibald, Louise Cullen, Jan Bikker, Forensic Anthropology, 2011,

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Jose Kerstholt, Aletta Eikelboom, Tjisse Dijkman, Reinoud Stoel, Rob Hermsen, Bert van Leuven, Does suggestive information cause a confirmation bias in bullet comparisons?, Forensic Science International, 2010, 198, 1-3, 138

    CrossRef