If Brain Scans Really Detected Deception, Who Would Volunteer to be Scanned?
Article first published online: 4 MAY 2010
© 2010 American Academy of Forensic Sciences
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume 55, Issue 5, pages 1352–1355, September 2010
How to Cite
Spence, S. A., Hope-Urwin, A., Lankappa, S. T., Woodhead, J., Burgess, J. C.L. and Mackay, A. V. (2010), If Brain Scans Really Detected Deception, Who Would Volunteer to be Scanned?. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 55: 1352–1355. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01452.x
- Issue published online: 1 SEP 2010
- Article first published online: 4 MAY 2010
- Received 5 May 2009; and in revised form 13 July 2009; accepted 23 July 2009.
- forensic science;
- functional neuroimaging;
- functional magnetic resonance imaging;
- male prisoners
Abstract: Recent neuroimaging studies investigating the neural correlates of deception among healthy people, have raised the possibility that such methods may eventually be applied during legal proceedings. Were this so, who would volunteer to be scanned? We report a “natural experiment” casting some light upon this question. Following broadcast of a television series describing our team’s investigative neuroimaging of deception in 2007, we received unsolicited (public) correspondence for 12 months. Using a customized template to examine this material, three independent assessors unanimously rated 30 of an initial 56 communications as unequivocally constituting requests for a “scan” (to demonstrate their author’s “innocence”). Compared with the rest, these index communications were more likely to originate from incarcerated males, who were also more likely to engage in further correspondence. Hence, in conclusion, if neuroimaging were to become an acceptable means of demonstrating innocence then incarcerated males may well constitute those volunteering for such investigation.