SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    K.A. Martire, R.I. Kemp, M. Sayle, B.R. Newell, On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the Weak Evidence Effect., Forensic Science International, 2014,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Loene M. Howes, Roberta Julian, Sally F. Kelty, Nenagh Kemp, K. Paul Kirkbride, The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: Reports of DNA analysis, Forensic Science International, 2014, 237, 7

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Lisa L. Smith, Ray Bull, Validation of the factor structure and predictive validity of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale for robbery and sexual assault trial scenarios, Psychology, Crime & Law, 2014, 20, 5, 450

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Lisa L. Smith, Ray Bull, Exploring the Disclosure of Forensic Evidence in Police Interviews with Suspects, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2013,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Loene M. Howes, K. Paul Kirkbride, Sally F. Kelty, Roberta Julian, Nenagh Kemp, Forensic scientists’ conclusions: How readable are they for non-scientist report-users?, Forensic Science International, 2013, 231, 1-3, 102

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Kristy A. Martire, Richard I. Kemp, Ben R. Newell, The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2013, 45, 3, 305

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Lisa L. Smith, Ray Bull, Identifying and measuring juror pre-trial bias for forensic evidence: development and validation of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale, Psychology, Crime & Law, 2012, 18, 9, 797

    CrossRef