Funded internally by the University of Huddersfield.
CASE REPORT CRIMINALISTICS
Differentiating Between Genuine Damage and Falsified Damage to a Garment Following an Alleged Sexual Assault*
Article first published online: 3 APR 2012
© 2012 American Academy of Forensic Sciences
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume 57, Issue 6, pages 1634–1636, November 2012
How to Cite
Williams, G. and Haider, I. (2012), Differentiating Between Genuine Damage and Falsified Damage to a Garment Following an Alleged Sexual Assault. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57: 1634–1636. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02160.x
- Issue published online: 29 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 3 APR 2012
- Received 7 Mar. 2011; and in revised form 3 Aug. 2011; accepted 11 Sept. 2011.
- forensic science;
- clothing damage;
- sexual offense;
- bra damage;
- false allegation;
- reconstruction study
Abstract: An allegation of sexual assault was made in which a bra was torn off by the assailant causing extensive damage; however, it was observed that the hook and eye fastening was still intact. It was felt that it was not possible for a garment to receive such damage without damage to the hook and eye fastening, thus indicating that the complainant caused the damage to the bra herself to support a false allegation. Reconstruction experiments were conducted in which the conditions of the allegation were simulated utilizing a range of similar bras. Following the infliction of damage, the hook and eye fastenings were examined. In eight of nine experiments, the hook and eye fastening were intact, despite the application of enough force to cause separation of the bra cups in five of the experiments. This shows that bras may suffer extensive damage without damage to the hook and eye fastening.