Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds
Article first published online: 25 MAY 2012
©2012 The Authors. Journal of Field Ornithology ©2012 Association of Field Ornithologists
Journal of Field Ornithology
Volume 83, Issue 2, pages 166–179, June 2012
How to Cite
Celis-Murillo, A., Deppe, J. L. and Ward, M. P. (2012), Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 83: 166–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00366.x
- Issue published online: 25 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 25 MAY 2012
- Received 21 September 2011; accepted 20 February 2012
Table S1. Proportion of visits during which each species was detected and raw count of total number of species detected and shared in the six vegetation types and by the two survey methods (acoustic recordings or point counts). CD = coastal dune scrub, MN = mangrove, TF = mature low-stature deciduous thorn forest, SF = early-successional semievergreen forest, MF = late successional medium-stature semievergreen forest, and PA = grazed pastures. AR = acoustic recordings, and PC = Point Counts.
|JOFO_366_sm_TableS1.doc||261K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.