SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Agrawal, A. F., E. D. Brodie, III, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2001. Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix. Genetica 112–113:3343.
  • Arnold, S. J., and P. C. Phillips. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance–covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53:15161527.
  • Ashman, T.-L. 1999. Quantitative genetics of floral traits in a gynodioecious wild strawberry Fragaria virginiana: implications for the independent evolution of female and hermaphrodite floral phenotypes. Heredity 83:733741.
  • Ashman, T.-L.. 2003. Constraints on the evolution of males and sexual dimorphism: field estimates of genetic architecture of reproductive traits in three populations of gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana. Evolution 57:20122025.
  • Badyaev, A. V. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:369378.
  • Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of correlation structure in stalk-eyed flies (Diasemopsis, Diopsidae). Evolution 57:87103.
  • Blows, M. W., S. F. Chenoweth, and E. Hine. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance–covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163:329340.
  • Bulmer, M. G. 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon, Oxford , U.K .
  • Bégin, M., and D. A. Roff. 2003. The constancy of the G matrix through species divergence and the effects of quantitative genetic constraints on phenotypic evolution: a case study in crickets. Evolution 57:11071120.
  • Bégin, M., and D. A. Roff. 2004. From micro- to macroevolution through quantitative genetic variation: positive evidence from field crickets. Evolution 58:22872304.
  • Carr, D. E., and C. B. Fenster. 1994. Levels of genetic variation and covariation for Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) floral traits. Heredity 72:606618.
  • Carroll, S. B., and L. F. Delph. 1996. The effects of gender and plant architecture on allocation to flowers in dioecious Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 157:493500.
  • Caruso, C. M. 2004. The quantitative genetics of floral trait variation in Lobelia: potential constraints on adaptive evolution. Evolution 58:732740.
  • Cheverud, J. M. 1988. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42:958968.
  • Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:13351351.
  • Cohen, D., and R. Dukas. 1990. The optimal number of female flowers and the fruits-to-flowers ratio in plants under pollination and resources limitation. Am. Nat. 135:218241.
  • Delph, L. F., J. L. Gehring, F. M. Frey, A. M. Arntz, and M. Levri. 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58:15361546.
  • Delph, L. F., F. N. Knapczyk, and D. R. Taylor. 2002. Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia. J. Evol. Biol. 15:10111020.
  • Delph, L. F., and T. R. Meagher. 1995. Sexual dimorphism masks life-history trade-offs in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Ecology 76:775785.
  • Fenster, C. B., and D. E. Carr. 1997. Genetics of sex allocation in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 10:641661.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover Publications, Inc., New York .
  • Flury, B. 1988. Common principal components and related multivariate methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York .
  • Geber, M. A. 1999. Theories of the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Pp. 97122 in M. A.Geber, T. E.Dawson, and L. F.Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
  • Geber, M. A., T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
  • Gehring, J. L., and Y. B. Linhart. 1993. Sexual dimorphisms and response to low resources in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 154:152162.
  • Gleason, H. A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx , New York .
  • Guntrip, J., R. M. Sibly, and G. J. Holloway. 1997. The effect of novel environment and sex on the additive genetic variation and covariation in and between emergence body weight and development period in the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Heredity 78:158165.
  • Holloway, G. J., P. W. De Jong, and M. Ottenheim. 1993. The genetics and cost of chemical defense in the two-spot ladybird (Adalia bipunctata L.). Evolution 47:12291239.
  • Houle, D. 1991. Genetic covariance of life history traits: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45:630648.
  • Jensen, H., B.-E. Saether, T. H. Ringsby, J. Tufto, S. C. Griffith, and H. Ellegren. 2003. Sexual variation in heritability and genetic correlations of morphological traits in house sparrow (Passer domesticus). J. Evol. Biol. 16:12961307.
  • Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold, and R. Bürger. 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57:17471760.
  • Kruuk, L. E. B. 2004. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the “animal model”. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359:873890.
  • Lande, R. 1980a. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94:203215.
  • Lande, R.. 1980b. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292305.
  • Lande, R.. 1987. Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. Pp. 8394 in J. W.Bradbury and M. B.Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley and Sons, New York .
  • Laporte, M. M., and L. F. Delph. 1996. Sex-specific physiology and source-sink relations in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Oecologia 106:6372.
  • Lofsvold, D. 1986. Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus. I. Tests of the homogoeneity of genetic covariance structure among species and subspecies. Evolution 40:559573.
  • Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland , MA .
  • Mead, L. S., and S. J. Arnold. 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:264271.
  • Meagher, T. R. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). I. Genetic variation. Evolution 46:445457.
  • Meagher, T. R.. 1999. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism. Pp. 275294 in M. A.Geber, T. E.Dawson, and L. F.Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
  • Meagher, T. R., and L. F. Delph. 2001. Individual flower demography, floral phenotype, and floral display size in Silene latifolia. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:845860.
  • Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2003. Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative? Genetics 165:411425.
  • Morgan, M. T. 1993. Fruit to flower ratios and trade-offs in size and number. Evol. Ecol. 7:219232.
  • Neumaier, A., and E. Groeneveld. 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimates of covariances in sparse linear models. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30:326.
  • Owens, I. P. F., and R. V. Short. 1995. Hormonal basis of sexual dimorphism in birds: implications for new theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:4447.
  • Phillips, P. C. 1998. CPC- Common principal component analysis program. Available at http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~pphil/programs/cpc/cpc.htm. Accessed 9 January 2004.
  • Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance–covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:15061515.
  • Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735742.
  • Rice, W. R.. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223225.
  • Roff, D. A. 2000. The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift? Heredity 84:135142.
  • Rolff, J., S. A. O. Armitage, and D. W. Coltman. 2005. Genetic constraints and sexual dimorphism in immune defense. Evolution 59:18441850.
  • Sakai, S. 1993. Allocation to attractive structures in animal-pollinated flowers. Evolution 47:17111720.
  • Scotti, I., and L. F. Delph. 2006. Selective trade-offs and sex-chromosome evolution in Silene latifolia. Evolution 60:17931800.
  • Shaw, F. H., R. G. Shaw, G. S. Wilkinson, and M. Turelli. 1995. Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49:12601267.
  • Shaw, R. G. 1987. Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution 41:812826.
  • Shaw, R. G.. 1991. The comparison of quantitative genetic parameters between populations. Evolution 45:143151.
  • Shykoff, J. A., and E. Bucheli. 1995. Pollinator visitation patterns, floral rewards and the probability of transmission of Microbotryum violaceum, a venereal disease of plants. J. Ecol. 83:189198.
  • Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:320327.
  • Van Noordwijk, A. J., and G. De Jong. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Nat. 128:137142.
  • Waitt, D. E., and D. A. Levin. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic correlations in plants: a botanical test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 80:310319.
  • Warmke, H. E. 1946. Sex determination and sex balance in Melandrium. Am. J. Bot. 33:648660.
  • Wolf, J., S. Horackova, E. Groeneveld, and D. Peskovicova. 2000. Estimation of genetic parameters for sire pig breeds using purebred and crossbred information. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 45:525532.
  • Worley, A. C., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2000. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution 54:15331545.
  • Young, H. J. 2002. Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89:433440.