SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Abbott, R. J., and A. J. Lowe. 2004. Origins, establishment, and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82:467474.
  • Arathi, H. S., A. Rasch, C. Cox, and J. K. Kelly. 2002. Autogamy and floral longevity in Mimulus guttatus. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163:567573.
  • Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization. Oxford Univ. Press, New York .
  • Arnold, M. L. 2006. Evolution through genetic exchange. Oxford Univ. Press, New York .
  • Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 1995, Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 6771.
  • Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 2005. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Tr. Ecol. Evol. 10:6771.
  • Borchsenius, F. 2002. Staggered flowering in four sympatric varieties of Geonoma cuneata (Palmae). Biotropica 34:603606.
  • Burgess, K. S., M. Morgan, L. Deverno, and B. C. Husband. 2005. Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance. Mol. Ecol. 14:34713483.
  • Chari, J., and P. Wilson. 2001. Factors limiting hybridization between Penstemon spectabilis and P. contranthifolius. Can. J. Bot. 79:14391448.
  • Coyne, J. A. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355:511515.
  • Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362381.
  • Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1997. “Patterns of speciation in Drosophila” revisited. Evolution 51:295303.
  • Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland , MA .
  • Cruden, R. W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding system in flowering plants. Evolution 31:3246.
  • Cruzan, M. B., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1993. Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47:925934.
  • Diaz, A., and M. R. MacNair. 1998. The effect of plant size on the expression of cleistogamy in Mimulus nasutus. Func. Ecol. 12:9298.
  • Diaz, A., and M. R. MacNair. 1999. Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytol. 144:471478.
  • Dobzhansky, T. H. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York .
  • Dole, J. A., and K. Ritland. 1993. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 47:361373.
  • Dudash, M. R., and K. Ritland. 1991. Multiple paternity and self-fertilization in relation to floral age in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78:17461753.
  • Fenster, C. B., and D. E. Carr. 1997. Genetics of sex allocation in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 10:641661.
  • Fenster, C. B., P. K. Diggle, S. C. H. Barrett, and K. Ritland. 1995. The genetics of floral development differentiating two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Heredity 74:258266.
  • Fishman, L., and D. A. Stratton. 2004. The genetics of floral divergence and postzygotic barriers between outcrossing and selfing populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 58:296307.
  • Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis. 2001. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55:19321942.
  • Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis. 2006. A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 60:13721381.
  • Fishman, L., J. A. Kelly, and J. H. Willis. 2002. Minor quantitative trait loci underlie floral traits associated with mating system divergence in Mimulus. Evolution 56:21382155.
  • Gardner, M., and M. MacNair. 2000. Factors affecting the co-existence of the serpentine endemic Mimulus nudatus Curran and its presumed progenitor, Mimulus guttatus Fischer ex DC. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69:443459.
  • Goodwillie, C. 1999. Multiple origins of self-compatibility in Linanthus section Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): phylogenetic evidence from internal-transcribed-spacer sequence data. Evolution 53:13871395.
  • Grant, A. L. 1924. A monograph of the genus Mimulus. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gar. 11:99389.
  • Hurt, C. R., M. Farzin, and P. W. Hedrick. 2005. Premating, not postmating, barriers drive genetic dynamics in experimental hybrid populations of the endangered Sonoran Topminnow. Genetics 171:655662.
  • Husband, B. C., and H. A. Sabara. 2004. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytol. 161:703713.
  • Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 2000. Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. J. Ecol. 88:689701.
  • Kay, K. M. 2006. Reproductive isolation between two closely related hummingbird-pollinated neotropical gingers. Evolution 60:538552.
  • Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inoue. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot .
  • Kelly, A. J., and J. H. Willis. 1998. Polymorphic microsatellite loci in Mimulus guttatus and related species. Mol. Ecol. 7:769774.
  • Kiang, Y. T. 1973. Floral structure, hybridization and evolutionary relationship of two species of Mimulus. Rhodora 75:225238.
  • Kiang, Y. T., and J. L. Hamrick. 1978. Reproductive isolation in the Mimulus guttatus-M. nasutus complex. Am. Midl. Nat. 100:269276.
  • Koeniger, N., and G. Koeniger. 2000. Reproductive isolation among species of the genus Apis. Apidologie 31:313339.
  • Kohn, J. R., S. W. Graham, B. Morton, J. J. Doyle, and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontedericaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast restriction-site variation. Evolution 50:14541469.
  • Lamont, B. B., T. He, N. J. Enright, S. L. Krauss, and B. P. Miller. 2003. Anthropogenic disturbance promotes hybridization between Banksia species by altering their biology. J. Evol. Biol. 16:551557.
  • Latta, R., and K. Ritland. 1994. The relationship between inbreeding depression and prior inbreeding among populations of four Mimulus taxa. Evolution 48:806817.
  • Martin, N. H. 2004a. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus. (Scrophulariaceae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 6:777782.
  • Martin, N. H.. 2004b. Evolution, genetics, and maintenance of reproductive isolation in Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Duke University, Durham , NC .
  • Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York .
  • Mayr, E.. 1947. Ecological factors in speciation. Evolution 1:263288.
  • Mayr, E.. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • McIntosh, M. E. 2002. Flowering phenology and reproductive output in two sister species of Ferocactus (Cactaceae). Plant Ecol. 159:113.
  • Nosil, P., T. H. Vines, and D. J. Funk. 2006. Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants using divergent environments. Evolution 59:705719.
  • Petit, C., P. Lesbros, X. Ge, and J. D. Thompson. 1997. Variation in flowering phenology and selfing rate across a contact zone between diploid and tetraploid Arrhenatherum elatius (Poaceae). Heredity 79:3140.
  • Quinn, T. P., M. J. Unwin, and M. T. Kinnison. 2000. Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced Chinook salmon populations. Evolution 54:13721385.
  • Ramsey, J., H. D. Bradshaw, and D. W. Schemske. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:15201534.
  • Ritland, K. 1989. Correlated matings in the partial selfer, Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43:848859.
  • Ritland, K. 1990. Inferences about inbreeding depression based on changes of the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 44:12301241.
  • Ritland, K., and F.R. Ganders. 1987. Covariation of selfing rates with parental gene fixation indices within populations of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 41:760771
  • Ritland, K., and M. Leblanc. 2004. Mating system of four inbreeding monkeyflower (Mimulus) species revealed using ‘progeny-pair’ analysis of highly informative microsatellite markers. Plant Sp. Biol. 19:149157.
  • Schemske, D. W. 2000. Understanding the origin of species. Evolution 54:10691073.
  • Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:372380.
  • Schoen, D. J., M. O. Johnston, A. –M. L'Heureux, and J. V. Marsolais. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51:10901099.
  • Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:393430.
  • Slatkin, M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787792.
  • Sweigart, A., K. Karoly, A. Jones, and J. H. Willis. 1999. The distribution of individual inbreeding coefficients and pairwise relatedness in a population of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 83:625632.
  • Sweigart, A. L., and J. H. Willis. 2003. Patterns of nucleotide diversity in two species of Mimulus are affected by mating system and asymmetric introgression. Evolution 57:24902506.
  • Sweigart A. L., L. Fishman, and J. H. Willis. 2006. A simple genetics incompatibility causes hybrid male sterility in Mimulus. Genetics 172:24652479.
  • Sweigart, A. L., A. R. Mason, and J. H. Willis. 2007. Natural variation for a hybrid incompatibility between two species of Mimulus. Evolution 60: In Press.
  • Ushimaru, A., and K. Nakata. 2002. The evolution of flower allometry in selfing species. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4:12171227.
  • Vickery, R. K., Jr. 1956. Data on interracial and interspecific hybridizations in the section Simiolus of the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Utah Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 33:4564.
  • Vickery, R. K., Jr. 1964. Barriers to gene exchange between members of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 18:5269.
  • Vickery, R. K., Jr. 1973. Crossing barriers in the yellow monkey flowers of the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Genet. Lect. 3:3382.
  • Vickery, R. K., Jr. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol. Biol. 11:405507.
  • Wendt, T., M. B. F. Canela, D. E. Klein, and R. I. Rios. 2002. Selfing facilitates reproductive isolation among three sympatric species of Pitcairnia (Bromeliaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 232:201212.
  • Whiteman, H. H., and R. D. Semlitsch. 2005. Asymmetric reproductive isolation among polymorphic salamanders. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86:265281.
  • Willis, J. H. 1993. Partial self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in two populations of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 71:145154.