SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Andersson, M. B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ .
  • Arnold, S. J. 1994a. Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144:S126S148.
  • Arnold, S. J. 1994b. Is there a unifying concept of sexual selection that applies to both plants and animals? Am. Nat. 144:S1S12.
  • Arnold, S. J., and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143:317348.
  • Bartmann, S., and G. Gerlach. 2001. Multiple paternity and similar variance in reproductive success of male and female wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) housed in an enclosure. Ethology 107:889899.
  • Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349368.
  • Becher, S. A., and A. E. Magurran. 2004. Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 271:10091014.
  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1988. Reproductive success. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., S. D. Albon, and F. E. Guinness. 1988. Reproductive success in male and female red deer. Pp. 325343 in T. H.Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Darwin, C. R. 1871. Descent of man and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray, London .
  • Dewsbury, D. 2005. The Darwin–Bateman paradigm in historical context. J. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:831837.
  • Drickamer, L. C., S. H. Vessey, and E. M. Jakob. 2002. Animal behavior: mechanisms, ecology, evolution. McGraw Hill, New York .
  • Freeman, S., and J. C. Herron. 2001. Evolutionary analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River , NJ .
  • Gowaty, P. A., and S. P. Hubbell. 2005. Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. J. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:931944.
  • Greer, B. W., and M. M. Green. 1962. Genotype, phenotype and mating behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 96:175181.
  • Hafernik, J. E., and R. W. Garrison. 1986. Mating success and survival rate in a population of damselfiies: results at variance with theory. Am. Nat. 128:353365.
  • Hubbell, S. P., and L. K. Johnson. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130:91112.
  • Hulbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187211.
  • Jensen, H., B. E. Saether, T. H. Ringsby, J. Tufto, S. C. Griffith, and H. Ellegren. 2004. Lifetime reproductive success in relation to morphology in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. J. Anim. Ecol. 73:599611.
  • Krebs, J. R., and N. B. Davies. 1987. An introduction to behavioural ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford .
  • Le Boeuf, B. J., and J. Reiter. 1988. Lifetime reproductive success in northern elephant seals. Pp. 344362 in T. H.Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success. Univ. of Chicago, Chicago .
  • Manning, A. 1967. The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 15:239250.
  • Markow, T. A. 1996. Evolution of Drosophila mating systems. Evol. Biol. 29:73106.
  • Markow, T. A. 2000. Forced matings in natural populations of Drosophila. Am. Nat. 156:100103.
  • Marti, C. D. 1997. Lifetime reproductive success in barn owls near the limit of the species' range. Auk 114:581592.
  • McLain, D. K. 1991. Components of variance in male lifetime copulatory and reproductive success in a seed bug. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29:121126.
  • Merila, J., and B. C. Sheldon. 2000. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Am. Nat. 155:301310.
  • Merrel, D. J., and J. C. Underhill. 1956. Competition between mutants in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 41:469485.
  • Oring, L. W., M. A. Colwell, and J. M. Reed. 1991. Lifetime reproductive success in the spotted sandpiper (Actitis macularia): sex differences and variance components. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28:425432.
  • Parker, G. A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45:525567.
  • Ribble, D. O. 1992. Lifetime reproductive success and its correlates in the monogamous rodent, Peromyscus californicus. J Anim. Ecol. 61:457468.
  • Scott, D. K. 1988. Reproductive success in Bewick's swans. P. 538 in T. H.Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Sharp, P. M. 1984. The effect of inbreeding on competitive male mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106:601612.
  • Sheridan, M., and R. H. Tamarin. 1988. Space use, longevity, and reproductive success in meadow voles. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22:8590.
  • Smith, J. N. M. 1988. Determinants of lifetime reproductive success in the song sparrow. P. 538 in T. H.Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco .
  • Sutherland, W. J. 1985. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and account for Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33:13491352.
  • Tang-Martinez, Z., and B. T. Ryder. 2005. The problem with paradigms: Bateman's worldview as a case study. J. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:821830.
  • Thomas, C. S., and J. C. Coulson. 1988. Reproductive success of Kittiwake gulls, Rissa tridactyla. P. 538 in T. H.Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. P. 136179 in B.Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago .
  • Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114:742747.
  • Wade, M. J., and S. J. Arnold. 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28:446461.