SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Asai, T. 2000. Dichogamy in fullmoon maple (Acer japonicum Thunb.). Bull. Hokkaido Forest. Res. Inst. 37:2740.
  • Asmussen, C. B. 1999. Toward a chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the tribe Geonomeae (Palmeae). In A.Henderson, and F.Borchsenius eds. Evolution, variation, and classification of palms. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83:121129.
  • Barker, P. A., D. C. Freeman, and K. T. Harper. 1982. Variation in the breeding system of Acer grandidentatum. Forest Science 28:563557.
  • Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.). 1992. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin .
  • Barrett, S. C. H.. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Rev. Gen. 3:274284.
  • Bendixen, K. 2001. Reproduktionssystem des Feldahorns (Acer campestre L.)—Blühphänologie und genetische Untersuchungen. Doctoral Dissertation: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2001/bendixen/bendixen.pdf
  • Bertin, R. I. 1982. The ecology of sex expression in red buckeye. Ecology 63:445456.
  • Bertin, R. I., and C. M. Newman. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 59:112152.
  • Binggeli, P. 1992. Patterns of invasion of sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) in relation to species and ecosystem attributes. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Ulster . Summary at http://members.lycos.co.uk/woodyplantecology/sycamore/s_publications.htm.
  • Bollback, J. P. 2006. SIMMAP: stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinformatics 7:88.
  • Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112:975997.
  • Charnov, E. L., and J. Bull. 1977. When is sex environmentally determined? Nature 266:828830.
  • Crane, P. R., S. R. Manchester, and D. L. Dilcher. 1990. A preliminary survey of fossil leaves and well-preserved reproductive structures from the Sentinel Butte Formation (Paleocene) near Almont, North Dakota. Fieldiana, Geol., New Series 20(1418), Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
  • Darwin, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species, John Murray, London.
  • Dawson, T. E., and M. A. Geber. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. Pp. 175215 in M. A.Geber, T. E.Dawson, and L. F.Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, New York .
  • Delph, L. F., and D. E. Wolf. 2005. Evolutionary consequences of gender plasticity in genetically dimorphic breeding systems. New Phytol. 166:119128.
  • Delpino, F. 1874. Ulteriori osservazioni e considerazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale. Appendice. Dimorfismo nel noce (Juglans regia) e pleiontismo nelle piante. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 17:402407.
  • De Jong, P. C. 1976. Flowering and sex expression in Acer L. A biosystematic study. Meded. Landb. Univ. Wageningen 76:1201.
  • De Jong, P. C. 1994. Taxonomy and reproductive biology of maples. Pp. 69104 in D. M.Van Gelderen, P. C.De Jong, and H. J.Oterdoom, eds. Maples of the world. Timber Press, Portland , OR .
  • Dorken, M. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2003. Gender plasticity in Sagittaria sagittifolia (Alismataceae), a monoecious species. Plant Syst. Evol. 237:99106.
  • Dorken, M. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2004a. Sex determination and the evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:213219.
  • Dorken, M. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2004b. Phenotypic plasticity of vegetative and reproductive traits in monoecious and dioecious populations of Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): a clonal aquatic plant. J. Ecol. 92:3244.
  • Ehlers, B. K., and T. Bataillon. 2007. ‘Inconstant males' and the maintenance of labile sex expression in subdioecious plants. New Phytol. 174:194211.
  • Endress, P. K., and D. H. Lorence. 2004. Heterodichogamy of a novel type in Hernandia (Hernandiaceae) and its structural basis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165:753763.
  • Errera, L., and G. Gevaert. 1878. Sur la structure et les modes de fécondation des fleurs. Bull. Soc. R. Bot. Belgique 17:38181.
  • Fay, M. F., S. M. Swensen, and M. W. Chase. 1997. Taxonomic affinites of Medusagyne oppositifolia (Medusagynaceae). Kew Bull. 52:11120.
  • Freeman, D. C., L. J. Klikoff, and K. T. Harper. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193:597599.
  • Freeman, D. C., K. T. Harper, and E. L. Charnov. 1980. Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia 47:222232.
  • Gabriel, W. 2005. How stress selects for reversible phenotypic plasticity. J. Evol. Biol. 18:873883.
  • Gabriel, W. J. 1968. Dichogamy in Acer saccharum. Bot. Gaz. 129:334338.
  • Gleeson, S. K. 1982. Heterodichogamy in walnuts: inheritance and stable ratios. Evolution 36:892902.
  • Gleiser, M., and M. Verdú. 2005. Repeated evolution of dioecy from androdioecy in Acer. New Phytol. 165:633640.
  • Gleiser, M., M. Verdú, and J. R. Pannell. Submitted. Time-dependent gender specialization and the maintenance of males with protandrous and protogynous hermaphrodites in Acer opalus.
  • Graham, S. W., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2004. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91:10071021.
  • Grimm, G. W., S. S. Renner, A. Stamatakis, and V. Hemleben. 2006. A nuclear ribosomal DNA phylogeny of Acer inferred with maximum likelihood, splits graphs, and motif analyses of 606 sequences. Evol. Bioinform. 2:279294.
  • Gross, C. L. 2005. A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes—more monoecy but why? Am. J. Bot. 92:907919.
  • Guillon, J.-M., R. Julliard, and H. Leturque. 2006. Evolution of habitat-dependent sex allocation in plants: superficially similar to, but intrinsically different from animals. J. Evol. Biol. 19:500512.
  • Haas, T. P. 1933. Untersuchungen an der Gattung Acer. Dissertation München.
  • Harrington, M. G., K. J. Edwards, S. A. Johnson, M. W. Chase, and P. A. Gadek. 2005. Phylogenetic inference in Sapindaceae sensu lato using plastid matK and rbcL DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 30:366382.
  • Hibbs, D. E., and B. C. Fischer. 1979. Sexual and vegetative reproduction of striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum L.). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 106:222227.
  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. R. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754755.
  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., R. Nielsen, and J. P. Bollback. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52:131158.
  • Jesson, L. K., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2002. Solving the puzzle of mirror image flowers. Nature 417:407.
  • Jones, E. W. 1945a. Acer pseudoplatanus L. J. Ecol. 32:220237.
  • Jones, E. W.. 1945b. Acer campestre L. J. Ecol. 32:239252.
  • Jordan, W. C., M. W. Courtney, and J. E. Neigel. 1996. Low levels of intraspecific genetic variation at a rapidly evolving chloroplast DNA locus in North American duckweeeds (Lemnaceae). Am. J. Bot. 83:430439.
  • Kittle, A., M. L. DeVore, B. Wall, and K. Pigg. 2005. Acer fruits from the Paleocene of North Dakota. Georgia J. Sci. 63:32 (abstract, available at http://www.gpc.edu/~jaliff/GAJsci%2063-1.pdf).
  • Kocyan, A., L-B. Zhang, H. Schaefer, and S. S. Renner. A multi-locus chloroplast phylogeny for the Cucurbitaceae and its implications for character evolution and classification. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 44:553477.
  • Korpelainen, H. 1998. Labile sex expression in plants. Biol. Rev. 73:157180.
  • Khushalani, I. 1963. Floral morphology and embryology of Acer oblongum. Phyton 10:275284.
  • Levin, R. A., and J. S. Miller. 2005. Relationships within tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae): paraphyly of Lycium and multiple origins of gender dimorphism. Am. J. Bot. 92:20442053.
  • Lewis, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50:913925.
  • Li, J., Yue, J., and S. Shoup. 2006. Phylogenetics of Acer (Aceroideae, Sapindaceae) based on nucleotide sequences of two chloroplast non-coding regions. Harvard Pap. Bot. 11:101115.
  • Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. NZ. J. Bot. 24:135162.
  • Luo, S., D. Zhang, and S. S. Renner. 2007. Duodichogamy and androdioecy in the Chinese Phyllanthaceae Bridelia tomentosa Am. J. Bot. 94:260265.
  • Maddison, D. R. 2006. Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character changes. Evolution 60:17431746.
  • Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2003. MacClade 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland , MA .
  • McArthur, E. D., D. C. Freeman, L. S. Luckinbill, S. C. Sanderson, and G. L. Noller. 1992. Are trioecy and sexual lability in Atriplex canescens genetically based?: evidence from clonal studies. Evolution 46:17081721.
  • Matsui, K. 1995. Sex expression, sex change and fruiting habit in an Acer rufinerve population. Ecol. Res. 10:6574.
  • McClain, A. M., and S. R. Manchester. 2001. Dipteronia (Sapindaceae) from the Tertiary of North America and implications for the phytogeographic history of the Aceroideae. Am. J. Bot. 88:13161325.
  • Miller, J. S. and P. K. Diggle. 2003. Diversification of andromonoecy in Solanum section Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae): the roles of phenotypic plasticity and architecture. Am. J. Bot. 90:707715.
  • Nanami, S., H. Kawaguchi, and T. Yamakura. 2004. Sex change towards female in dying Acer rufinerve trees. Ann. Bot. 93:733740.
  • Navajas-Pérez, R., R. De La Herrán, G. López González, M. Jamilena, R. Lozano, C. Ruiz Rejón, M. Ruiz Rejón, and M. A. Garrido-Ramos. 2005. The evolution of reproductive systems and sex-determining mechanisms within Rumex (Polygonaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplastidial sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:19291939.
  • Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala Univ.
  • Ohwi, J. 1965. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institution Washington , DC .
  • Olmstead, R. G., H. J. Michaels, K. M. Scott, and J. D. Palmers. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major linages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79:249265.
  • Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:3745.
  • Pannell, J. R. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:397425.
  • Pannell, J. R., and M. Verdú. 2006. The evolution and gender specialization from dimorphic hermaphroditism: paths from heterodichogamy to gynodioecy and androdioecy. Evolution 60:660673.
  • Pendleton, R. L., D. C. Freeman, E. D. McArthur, and S. C. Sanderson. 2000. Gender specialisation in heterodichogamous Grayia brandegei (Chenopodiaceae): evidence for an alternative pathway to dioecy. Am. J. Bot. 87:508516.
  • Primack, R. B., and C. McCall. 1986. Gender variation in a red maple population (Acer rubrum; Aceraceae): a seven-year study of a “polygamodioecious species Am. J. Bot. 73:12391248.
  • Renner, S. S. 2001. Heterodichogamy, how common is it? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:595597.
  • Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82:596606.
  • Renner, S. S., and H. Won. 2001. Repeated evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Siparunaceae (Laurales). Syst. Biol. 50:700712.
  • Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:15721574.
  • Ronse Decraene, L. P., E. Smets, and D. Clinckemaillie. 2000. Floral ontogeny and anatomy in Koelreuteria with special emphasis on monosymmetry and septal cavities. Plant Syst. Evol. 223:91107.
  • Ross, M. D. 1982. Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. Am. Nat. 119:297318.
  • Saeki, I. 2005. Ecological occurrence of the endangered Japanese red maple, Acer pycnanthum: base line for ecosystem conservation. Landscape Ecol. Eng. 1:135147.
  • Sakai, A. K. 1978. Ecological and evolutionary aspects of sex expression in silver maple, Acer saccharinum. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor , MI .
  • Sakai, A. K.. 1990. Sex ratios of red maple (Acer rubrum) populations in northern lower Michigan. Ecology 71:571580.
  • Sakai, A. K., and N. L. Oden. 1983. Spatial pattern of sex expression in silver maple (Acer saccharinum): Morisita's index and spatial autocorrelation. Am. Nat. 122:489508.
  • Sakai, A. K., and S. G. Weller. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. Pp. 131 in Sexual and gender dimorphism in flowering plants M. A.Geber, T. E.Dawson, and L. F.Delph eds. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg .
  • Sang, T., D. J. Crawford, and T. F. Stuessy. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84:11201136.
  • Sato, T. 2002. Phenology of sex expression and gender variation in a heterodichogamous maple, Acer japonicum. Ecology 83:12261238.
  • Schlessman, M. A. 1988. Gender diphasy (“sex choice”). Pp. 139153 in J.Lovett Doust, and L.Lovett Doust eds. Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies, Oxford Univ. Press, New York .
  • Scholz, E. 1960. Blütenmorphologische und -biologische Untersuchungen bei Acer pseudoplatanus L. und Acer platanoides L. Der Züchter 30:1116.
  • Semm, A. 1966. Blühen, Früchten und Keimen in der Gattung Acer. Dissertation, München.
  • Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:26882690.
  • Stout, A. B. 1928. Dichogamy in flowering plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 5:141153.
  • Stehlik, I., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2006. Pollination intensity influences sex ratios in dioecious Rumex nivalis, a wind-pollinated plant. Evolution 60:12071214.
  • Svobodavá, D. 1967. Subspezifische Taxone von Acer platanoides und ihre Blütenbiologie. Proc. Intl. Symp. on Biology of Woody Plants: 4954.
  • Taberlet, P. L., G. Gielly, J. Pautou, and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17:11051109.
  • Tal, O. 2006. Comparative flowering ecology of Fraxinus excelsior, Acer platanoides, Acer pseudoplatanus and Tilia cordata in the canopy of Leipzig's floodplan forest. Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Biology, Leipzig University .
  • Tate, J. A., and B. B. Simpson. 2003. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst. Bot. 28:723737.
  • Taylor, T. N., H. Kerp, and H. Hass. 2005. Life history biology of early land plants: Deciphering the gametophyte phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:58925897.
  • Thompson, T. E., and L. D. Romberg. 1985. Inheritance of heterodichogamy in pecan. J. Heredity 76:456458.
  • Thorne, J. L., and H. Kishino. 2002. Divergence time estimation and rate evolution with multilocus data sets. Syst. Biol. 51:689702.
  • Todd, J. E. 1882. On the flowers of Solanum rostratum and Cassia chamaecrista. Am. Nat. 16:281287.
  • Ushimaru, A., and K. Matsui. 2001. Sex change in tree species: long-term monitoring of sex expression in Acer rufinerve. Nordic J. Bot. 21:397399.
  • Van Gelderen, D. M., P. C.De Jong, and H. J.Oterdoom (eds.). 1994. Maples of the world. Timber Press, Portland , OR .
  • Vamosi, J. C., S. M. Vamosi, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2006. Sex in advertising: dioecy alters the net benefits of attractiveness in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 273:24012407.
  • Weller, S. G., and A. K. Sakai. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:167199.
  • Wittrock, V. B. 1886. Über die Geschlechtsverteilung bei Acer platanoides L. und einigen anderen Acer-Arten. Bot. Centralbl. 25:5568.
  • Wolfe, J. A., and T. Tanai. 1987. Systematics, phylogeny, and distribution of Acer in the Cenozoic of western North America. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. IV: Geol. and Mineral. 22:1246.
  • Xu, T. Z., Y. S. Chen, P. C. De Jong, H. J. Oterdoom, and C. S. Chang. In preparation. Aceraceae. in Z. Y.Wu, and P. H.Raven (eds.). Flora of China. Vol. 11. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis .
  • Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comp. Appl. BioSci. 13:555556 http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html.
  • Yampolsky, C., and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl. Gen. 3:162.