SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Baer, B., and J. J. Boomsma. 2004. Male reproductive investment and queen mating-frequency in fungus growing ants. Behav. Ecol. 15:426432.
  • Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London .
  • Brown, C. R., and M. B. Brown. 2003. Testis size increases with colony size in cliff swallows. Behav. Ecol. 14:569575.
  • Byrne, P. G., J. D. Roberts, and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Sperm competition selects for increased testes mass in Australian frogs. J. Evol. Biol. 15:347355.
  • Cook, D. F. 1990. Differences in courtship, mating and postcopulatory behavior between male morphs of the dung beetle Onthophagus binodis Thunberg (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Anim. Behav. 40:428436.
  • Eberhard, W. G., and E. E. Gutierrez. 1991. Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45:1828.
  • Emlen, D. J. 1996. Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50:12191230.
  • Emlen, D. J. 1997. Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41:335342.
  • Emlen, D. J., J. Hunt, and L. W. Simmons. 2005a. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the expression of beetle horns: phylogenetic evidence for modularity, evolutionary liability, and constraint. Am. Nat. 166:S42S68.
  • Emlen, D. J., J. Marangelo, B. Ball, and C. W. Cunningham. 2005b. Diversity in the weapons of sexual selection: horn evolution in the beetle genus Onthophagus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 59:10601084.
  • Falster, D. S., D. I. Warton, and I. J. Wright. 2006. (S)MATR: Standardised major axis tests and routines. Version 2.0. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR.
  • Fincher, G. T., and R. E. Woodruff. 1975. A European dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus Schreber, new to the U.S. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Coleopterist's Bull.. 29:349350.
  • Gage, M. J. G. 1994. Associations between body size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258:247254.
  • Gage, M. J. G. 1995. Continuous variation in reproductive strategy as an adaptive response to population density in the moth Plodia interpunctella. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261:2530.
  • Gage, M. J. G., P. Stockley, and G. A. Parker. 1995. Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 350:391399.
  • Gross, M. R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 11:9298.
  • Harcourt, A. H., A. Purvis, and L. Liles. 1995. Sperm competition: mating system, not breeding season, affects testes size of primates. Funct. Ecol. 9:468476.
  • He, Y., and T. Miyata. 1997. Variations in sperm number in relation to larval crowding and spermatophore size in the armyworm, Pseudaletia separata. Ecol. Entomol. 22:4146.
  • He, Y., and Y. Tsubaki. 1992. Variation in spermatophore size in the armyworm, Pseudaletia separata, (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to rearing density. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 27:3945.
  • Hosken, D. J. 1997. Sperm competition in bats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 264:385392.
  • Howden, H. F., and O. L. Cartwright. 1963. Scarab beetles of the genus Onthophagus Latreille north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 114:1133.
  • Howden, H. F., and B. D. Gill. 1993. Mesoamerican Onthophagus Latreille in the dicranius and mirabilis species groups (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Can. Ent. 125:10911114.
  • Hunt, J., and L. W. Simmons. 1998a. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: no evidence for reliable signalling. Behav. Ecol. 9:465470.
  • Hunt, J., and L. W. Simmons. 1998b. Patterns of parental provisioning covary with male morphology in a horned beetle (Onthophagus taurus)(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42:447451.
  • Hunt, J., and L. W. Simmons. 2000. Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution 54:936941.
  • Hunt, J., and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Confidence of paternity and paternal care: covariation revealed through the experimental manipulation of the mating system in the beetle Onthophagus taurus. J. Evol. Biol. 15:784795.
  • Kotiaho, J. S., and L. W. Simons. 2003. Longevity cost of reproduction for males but no longevity cost of mating or courtship for females in the male-dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus binodis. J. Insect Physiol. 49:817822.
  • Matthews, E. G. 1971. A revision of the scarabaeine dung beetles of Australia I. Tribe Onthophagini. Aust. J. Zool. Supplement 9:3330.
  • Moczek, A. P., and D. J. Emlen. 2000. Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favor alternative phenotypes? Anim. Behav. 59:459466.
  • Moczek, A. P., J. Hunt, D. J. Emlen, and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Threshold evolution in exotic populations of a polyphenic beetle. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4:587601.
  • Moczek, A. P., and H. F. Nijhout. 2003. Rapid evolution of a polyphenic threshold. Evol. Dev. 5:259268.
  • Neff, B. D., P. Fu, and M. R. Gross. 2003. Sperm investment in alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav. Ecol. 14:634641.
  • Parker, G. A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45:525567.
  • Parker, G. A. 1990a. Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242:120126.
  • Parker, G. A. 1990b. Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242:127133.
  • Parker, G. A. 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base, Pp. 354 in T. R.Birkhead and A. P.Møller (eds.), Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London .
  • Parker, G. A., and M. A. Ball. 2005. Sperm competition, mating rate and the evolution of testes and ejaculate sizes: a population model. Biol. Lett. 1:235238.
  • Parker, G. A., M. A. Ball, P. Stockley, and M. J. G. Gage. 1997. Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:17931802.
  • Pitcher, T. E., P. O. Dunn, and L. A. Whittingham. 2005. Sperm competition and the evolution of testis size in birds. J. Evol. Biol. 18:557567.
  • Pitnick, S. 1996. Investment in testes and the cost of making long sperm in Drosophila. Am. Nat. 148:5780.
  • Purvis, A., and A. Rambaut. 1995. Comparative-Analysis by Independent Contrasts (CAIC)—an Apple-Macintosh application for analyzing comparative data. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11:247251.
  • Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ .
  • Simmons, L. W., M. Beveridge, and S. Krauss. 2004. Genetic analysis of parentage within experimental populations of a male dimorphic beetle, Onthophagus taurus, using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57:164173.
  • Simmons, L. W., and D. J. Emlen. 2006. Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:1634916351.
  • Simmons, L. W., and J. S. Kotiaho. 2007. The effects of reproduction on courtship, fertility and longevity within and between alternative male mating tactics of the horned beetle Onthophagus binodis. J. Evol. Biol. 20:488495.
  • Simmons, L. W., J. L. Tomkins, and J. Hunt. 1999. Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:145150.
  • Stockley, P., M. J. G. Gage, G. A. Parker, and A. P. Møller. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149:933954.
  • Tan, G. N., F. R. Govedich, and M. Burd. 2004. Social group size, potential sperm competition and reproductive investment in a hermaphroditic leech, Helobdella papillornata. J. Evol. Biol. 17:574580.
  • Tomkins, J. L., and L. W. Simmons. 2000. Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles: fertilisation gains with equal mating access. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:15471553.
  • Tomkins, J. L., and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Measuring relative investment: a case study of testes investment in species with alternative male reproductive tactics. Anim. Behav. 63:10091016.
  • Tyndale-Biscoe, M. 1996. Australia's introduced dung beetles: original releases and redistributions. Technical Report No. 62. CSIRO Division of Entomology, Canberra , ACT.
  • Vladic, T. V., and T. Järvi. 2001. Sperm quality in the alternative reproductive tactics of Atlantic salmon: the importance of the loaded raffle mechanism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:23752381.
  • Warton, D. I., I. J. Wright, D. S. Falster, and M. Westoby. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting models for allometry. Biol. Rev. 81:259251.
  • Zunino, M. 1972. Revisione delle specie paleartiche del genere Onthophagus Latr. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). I. -Il sottogenere Euonthophagus Balth. Boll. Mus. Zool. Univ. Torino 5:128.
  • Zunino, M. 1979. Gruppi artificiali e gruppi naturali negli Onthophagus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). Boll. Mus. Zool. Univ. Torino 1:118.