SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Arnold, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140:S85S107.
  • Arthur, W. 2002. The interaction between developmental bias and natural selection: from centipede segments to a general hypothesis. Heredity 89:239246.
  • Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55:13731385.
  • Becker, W. A. 1992. Manual of quantitative genetics, the ed. Academic Enterprises, Pullman , WA .
  • Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416:844847.
  • Brakefield, P. M. 2007. Evo-devo and constraints on selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:362368
  • Brakefield, P. M., E. El Filali, R. Van Der Laan, C. J. Breuker, I. J. Saccheri, and B. J. Zwaan. 2001. J. Evol. Biol. 14:148156.
  • Bohren, B. B., W. G. Hill, and A. Robertson. 1966. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet. Res. 7: 4457.
  • Burger, R. 1986. Constraints for the evolution of functionally coupled characters: a nonlinear analysis of a phenotypic model. Evolution 40:182193.
  • Burkhardt, D., and I. De La Motte. 1987. Physiological, behavioral, and morphometric data elucidate the evolutive significance of stalked eyes in Diopsidae (Diptera). Entomol. Gener. 12:221233.
  • Carroll, S. B., J. Gates, D. N. Keys, S. W. Paddock, G. E. F. Panganiban, J. E. Selegue, and J. A. Williams. 1994. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265:109114.
  • Carroll, S. B., J. K. Grenier, and S. D. Weatherbee. 2001. From DNA to diversity: molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Blackwell Science, Malden , MA .
  • Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110:155171.
  • Cock, A. G. 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 41:131190.
  • Dudley, R. 2000. The biomechanics of insect flight: form, function, evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Eberhard, W. G., and E. E. Gutierrez. 1991. Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45:1828.
  • Emlen, D. J. 1996. Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera:Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50:12191230.
  • Emlen, D. J.. 1997. Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Nov. 41:335341.
  • Emlen, D. J., and C. E. Allen. 2004. Genotype to phenotype: physiological control of trait size and scaling in insects. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43:617634.
  • Emlen, D. J., and H. F. Nijhout. 2000. The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 45:661708.
  • Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1997. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Essex , U.K .
  • Frankino, W. A., and R. A. Raff. 2004. Evolutionary importance and pattern of phenotypic plasticity: insights gained from development. Pp. 6481 in T. J.DeWitt, and S. M.Scheiner, eds. Phenotypic plasticity, functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford Press, Cambridge UK .
  • Frankino, W. A., B. J. Zwaan, D. L. Stern, and P. M. Brakefield. 2005. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307:718720.
  • Gromko, M. H. 1995. Unpredictability of correlated response to selection: pleiotropy and sampling interact. Evolution 49:685693.
  • Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41:587640.
  • Hansen, T. F., W. S. Ambruster, M. L. Carlson, and C. Pelabon. 2003. Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: genetic correlations and conditional evolvability. J. Exp. Zool. 296B:2339.
  • Hansen, T. F., and D. Houle. 2004. Evolvability, stabilizing selection, and the problem of stasis. Pp. 130150 in M.Pigliucci and K.Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, New York .
  • Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of relative growth. Methuen & Co., London .
  • Joron, M., and P. M. Brakefield. 2003. Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424:191194.
  • Keys, D. N., D. L. Lewis, J. E. Selegue, B. J. Pearson, L. V. Goodrich, R. L. Johnson, J. Gates, M. P. Scott, and S. B. Carroll. 1999. Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283:532534.
  • Kingsolver, J. G. 1999. Experimental analyses of wing size, flight, and survival in the western white butterfly. Evolution 53:14791490.
  • Klingenberg, C. P. 2005. Developmental constraints, modules, and evolvability. Pp. 219247 in B.Hallgrimsson, and B. K.Hall, eds. Variation. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington , MA .
  • Klingenberg, C. P., and M. Zimmermann. 1992. Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water striders. Am. Nat. 140:601620.
  • Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain body size allometry. Evolution 33:402416.
  • Lessels, C. M., and P. T. Boag. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116121.
  • Maynard Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kauffman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, D. Raup, and L. Wolpert. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 60:265287.
  • Meagher, T. R., and D. J. Futuyma. 2001. Executive document: evolution, science, and society. Am. Nat. 158(S1):145.
  • Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:10271038.
  • Moczek, A. P., and D. J. Emlen. 2002. Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? Anim. Behav. 59:459466.
  • Moczek, A. P., J. Hunt, D. J. Emlen, and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Threshold evolution in exotic population of a polyphenic beetle. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4:587601.
  • Nijhout, H. F. 1994. Insect hormones. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Nijhout, H. F., and D. J. Emlen. 1998. Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:36853689.
  • Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:12091222.
  • Price, T., M. Turelli, and M. Slatkin. 1993. Peak shifts produced by correlated response to selection. Evolution 47:280290.
  • Rice, S. H. 1998. The evolution of canalization and the breaking of von Baer's laws: modeling the evolution of development with epistasis. Evolution 52:647656.
  • Rice, S. H.. 2002. A general population genetic theory for the evolution of developmental interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1551815523.
  • Rice, S. H.. 2004. Developmental associations between traits: covariance and beyond. Genetics 166:513526.
  • Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:17661774.
  • Shingleton, A. W., W. A. Frankino, T. Flatt, H. F. Nijhout, and D. J. Emlen. 2007. Size and shape: the regulation of static allometry in insects. BioEssays 29:536548.
  • Sinervo, B., and A. L. Basolo. 1996. Testing adaptation using phenotypic manipulations. Pp. 149185 in M. J.Rose and G. V.Lauder, eds. Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego , CA .
  • Sinervo, B., P. Doughty, R. B. Huey, and K. Zamudio. 1992. Allometric engineering: a causal analysis of natural selection on offspring size. Science 258:19271930.
  • Sinervo, B., and P. Licht. 1991. Proximate constraints on the evolution of egg size, egg number, and total clutch mass in lizards. Science 252:13001302.
  • Stern, D. L., and D. J. Emlen. 1999. The developmental basis of allometry in insects. Development 126:10911101.
  • Strauss, R. E. 1990. Patterns of quantitative variation in lepidopteran wing morphology: the convergent groups heliconiinae and ithomiinae (Papilionoidea: Nymphalidae). Evolution 44:86103.
  • Strauss, R. E.. 1992. Lepidopteran wing morphology: the multivariate analysis of size, shape, and allometric scaling. Pp. 157179 in J. T.Sorensen, and R.Foottit, eds. Ordination in the study of morphology, evolution, and systematics of insects: applications and quantitative genetic rationales. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam .
  • Thompson, D. W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge .
  • Wagner, G. P. 1996. Homologues, natural kinds, and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 36:3643.
  • Wagner, G. P., G. Booth, and H. Bagheri-Chaichian. 1997. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51:329347.
  • Weber, K. E. 1990. Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126:975989.
  • Wickman, P. 1992. Sexual selection and butterfly design—a comparative study. Evolution 46:15251536.
  • Wilkinson, G. S. 1993. Artificial selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera:Diopsidae). Genet. Res. 62:213222.
  • Wilkinson, G. S., and P. R. Reillo. 1994. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. Biol. Sci. 255:16.
  • Windig, J. J., P. M. Brakefield, P. M. Reitsma, and J. G. M. Wilson. 1994. Seasonal polyphenism in the wild: survey of wing patterns in five species of Bicyclus butterflies in Malawi. Ecol. Entomol. 19:285298.
  • Wolf, J. B., C. E. Allen, and W. A. Frankino. 2004. Multivariate phenotypic evolution in developmental hyperspace. Pp. 366389 in M.Pigliucci, and K.Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, New York .
  • Wolf, J. B., W. A. Frankino, A. F. Agrawal, E. D. Brodie III, and A. J. Moore. 2001. Developmental interactions and the constituents of quantitative variation. Evolution 55:232245.
  • Zeng, Z. 1988. Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariation, and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42:363374.