SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Amundsen, T. 2000. Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:149155.
  • Amundsen, T., and E. Forsgren. 2001. Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1315513160.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton .
  • Andersson, L. 2001. Genetic dissection of phenotypic plasticity in domestic animals. Nature Rev. Genet. 2:1308.
  • Andersson, M., and L. W. Simmons. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:296302.
  • Beavis, W. D. 1998. QTL analyses: power, precision and accuracy. 49th Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference. ASTA, Washington DC . 250266.
  • Blas, J., L. Perez-Rodriguez, G. R. Bartlett, J. Vineland, and T. A. Merchant. 2006. Testosterone increases bioavailability of carotenoids: insights into the honesty of sexual signalling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 49:1863318637.
  • Bolton, M. 1991. Determinants of chick survival in the lesser black-backed gull: relative contributions of egg size and parental quality. J. Anim. Ecol. 60:949960.
  • Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76:305339.
  • Bullock, J., and J. C. Hall. 1968. Effect of steroid esters on comb growth. World Poult. Sci. J. 24:328.
  • Cameron, E., T. Day, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. J. Evol. Biol. 16:10551060.
  • Carlborg, Ö., L. Andersson, and B. Kinghorn. 2000. The use of a genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics 155:20032010.
  • Cheng, H., W. Jiang, F. M. Phillips, R. C. Haydon, Y. Peng, L. Zhou, H. H. Luu, N. L. An, B. Breyer, P. Vanichakarn, et al. 2003. Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). J. Bone Joint. Surg. 85:15441552.
  • Chenoweth, S. F., P. Doughty, and H. Kokko. 2006. Can non-directional selection male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation? Ecol. Lett. 9:179184.
  • Cotton, S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:771783.
  • Cloutier, S., and R. C. Newberry. 2000. Recent social experience, body weight and initial patterns of attack predict the social status attained by unfamiliar hens in a new group. Behaviour 137:705726.
  • Cordero, C., and W. G. Eberhard. 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16:16.
  • Cornwallis, C. K., and Birkhead, T. R. 2007. Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274:583590.
  • Cransberg, P. H., G. B. Parkinson, S. Wilson, and B. H. Thorp. 2001. Sequential studies of skeletal calcium reserves and structural bone volumes in a commercial layer flock. Brit. Poult. Sci. 42:260265.
  • Dacke, C. G., S. Arkle, D. J. Cook, I. M. Wormstone, S. Jones, M. Zaidi, and Z. A. Bascal. 1993. Medullary bone and avian calcium regulation. J. Exp. Biol. 184:6388.
  • Etches, R. J. 1996. Reproduction in poultry. CAB International, Wallingford , UK .
  • Foley, B., S. F. Chenoweth, S. V. Nuzhdin, and M. W. Blows. 2007. Natural genetic variation in cuticular hydrocarbon expression in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 175:14651477.
  • Fumihito A, T. Miyake, S. I. Sumi, S. Ohno, and N. Kondo. 1994. One species of the red jungelfowl (Gallus gallus gallus) suffices as the matriarchic ancestor of all domestic breeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1250512509.
  • Gleason, J. M., S. V. Nuzhdin, and M. G. Ritchie. 2002. Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 89:16.
  • Griggio, M., G. Matessi, and A. Pilastro. 2003. Male rock sparrow (Petronia petronia) nest defence correlates with female ornament size. Ethology 109:659669.
  • Hughes, K. A., and J. Leips. 2006. Quantitative trait locus analysis of male mating success and sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60:14271434.
  • Huttunen, S., J. Aspi, A. Hoikkala, and C. Schloterrer. 2004. QTL analysis of variation in male courtship song in Drosophila virilis. Heredity 92:263269.
  • Johns, P. M., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2007. X chromosome influences sperm length in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Heredity 99:5661.
  • Jones, I. L., and F. M. Hunter. 1993. Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird. Nature 362:238239.
  • Jones, K. M., P. Monaghan, and R. G. Nager. 2001. Male mate choice and female fecundity in zebra finches. Anim. Behav. 62:10211026.
  • Keeling, L., L. Anderson, K. E. Schütz, S. Kerje, R. Fredriksson, Ö. Carlborg, C. K. Cornwallis, T. Pizzari, and P. Jensen. 2004. Chicken genomics: feather-pecking and victim pigmentation. Nature 431:645646.
  • Kerje, S., Ö. Carlborg, L. Jacobsson, K. Schütz, C. Hartmann, P. Jensen, and L. Andersson. 2003. The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Anim. Genet. 34:264274.
  • Kerje, S., P. Sharma, U. Gunnarsson, H. Kim, S. Bagchi, R. Fredriksson, K. Schütz, P. Jensen, G. Von Heijne, R. Okimoto, et al. 2004. Dominant white, Dun and Smoky color variants in chicken are associated with insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the PMEL17 gene. Genetics 168:15071518.
  • Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:653664.
  • Kopp, A., R. M. Graze, S. Z. Xu, S. B. Carroll, and S. V. Nuzhdin. 2003. Quantitative trait loci responsible for variation in sexually dimorphic traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 163:771787.
  • Kusuhara, S., and H. Schraer. 1982. Cytology and autoradiography of estrogen-induced differentiation of avian endosteal cells. Calcified Tissue Int. 34:352358.
  • Mead, L. S., and S. J. Arnold. 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:264271.
  • Moehring, A. J., and T. F. C. Mackay. 2004. The quantitative genetic basis of male mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167:12491263.
  • Mundy, N. I. 2005. A window on the genetics of evolution: MC1R and plumage colouration in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:16331640.
  • Niecke, M., S. Rothlaender, and A. Roulin. 2003. Why do melanin ornaments signal individual quality? Insights from metal element analysis of barn owl feathers. Oecologia 137:153158.
  • Nishibori, M., T. Shimogiri, T. Hayashi, and H. Yasue. 2005. Molecular evidence for hybridization of species in the genus Gallus except for Gallus varius. Anim. Genet. 36:367375.
  • Ohashi, T., S. Kusuhara, and K. Ishida. 1987. Effects of oestrogen and anti-oestrogen on the cells of the endosteal surface of male Japanese quail. Brit. Poult. Sci. 28:727732.
  • Parker, J. E., F. F. McKenzie, and H. L. Kempster. 1942. Development of the testis and combs of White Leghorn and New Hampshire cockerels. Poult. Sci. 21:3544.
  • Parker, T. H., and J. D. Ligon. 2003. Female mating preferences in red junglefowl: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Ethol. Evol. 15:6372.
  • Pérez-Enciso, M., and I. Misztal. 2004. Qxpak: a versatile mixed model application for genetical genomics and QTL analyses. Bioinformatics 20:27922798.
  • Pizzari, T., and R. R. Snook. 2003. Sexual conflict: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57:12231236.
  • Pizzari, T., D. P. Froman, and T. R. Birkhead. 2002. Pre- and post-insemination episodes of sexual selection in the fowl. Heredity 88:112116.
  • Pizzari, T., C. K. Cornwallis, H. Løvlie, S. Jakobsson, and T. R. Birkhead. 2003. Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature 426:7074.
  • Reynolds, S. J., R. Mänd, and V. Tilgar. 2004. Calcium supplementation of breeding birds: directions for future research. Ibis 146:601614.
  • Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735742.
  • Rosenthal, G. G., and F. J. García De León. 2006. Sexual behavior, genes, and evolution in Xiphophorus. Zebrafish 3:8590.
  • Roulin, A. 2004. Proximate basis of the covariation between a melanin-based female ornament and offspring quality. Oecologia 140:668675.
  • Roulin, A., T. Dauwe, R. Blust, M. Eens, and M. Beaud. 2006. A link between eumelanism and calcium physiology in the barn owl. Naturwissenschaften 93:426430.
  • Rubin, C.-J., H. Brändström, D. Wright, S. Kerje, U. Gunnarsson, K. Schütz, R. Fredriksson, P. Jensen, L. Andersson, C. Ohlsson, et al. 2006. Quantitative Trait Loci for trabecular bone mineral density and bone strength in an intercross between domestic and wild-type chicken. J. Bone Min. Res. 22:375384.
  • Schreiweis, M. A., P. Y. Hester, P. Settarand, and D. E. Moody. 2005. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with egg quality, egg production, and body weight in an F2 resource population of chickens. Anim. Genet. 37:106112.
  • Schütz, K., S. Kerje, Ö. Carlborg, L. Jacobsson, L. Andersson, and P. Jensen. 2002. QTL analysis of a red junglefowl × White Leghorn intercross reveals trade-off in resource allocation between behavior and production traits. Behav. Genet. 32:423433.
  • Servedio, M. R., and R. Lande. 2006. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice. Evolution 60:674685.
  • Sugiyama, T. and S. Kusuhara. 2001. Avian calcium metabolism and bone function. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:8290.
  • Taylor, T. G. 1970. How an eggshell is made. Sci. Am. 222:8994.
  • Tomkins, J. L., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza. 2004. Genetic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323328.
  • Tufvesson, M., B. Tufvesson, T. Von Schantz, K. Johansson, and M. Wilhelmson. 1999. Selection for sexual male characters and their effects on other fitness related traits in White Leghorn chickens. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 116:127138.
  • Von Schantz, T., M. Tufvesson, G. Göransson, M. Grahn, M. Wilehelmson, and H. Wittzell. 1995. Artificial selection for increased comb size and its effects on other sexual characters and viability in Gallus domesticus (the domestic chicken). Heredity 75:518529.
  • Wagner, E. C., and T. D. Williams. 2007. Experimental (antiestrogen-mediated) reduction in egg size negatively affects offspring growth and survival. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 80:293305.
  • Wang, E. A., V. Rosen, J. S. D'Alessandro, M. Bauduy, P. Cordes, T. Harada, D. I. Israel, R. M. Hewick, K. M. Kerns, P. LaPan, et al. 1990. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein induces bone formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:22202224.
  • Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:313320.
  • Williams, T. D. 1994. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol. Rev. 68:35– 59.
  • Wilson, H. R. 1991. Inter-relationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth and hatchability. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 47:520.
  • Wilson, S., and S. R. I. Duff. 1990. Morphology of medullary bone during the egg formation cycle. Res. Vet. Sci. 48:216220.
  • Wright, D., S. Kerje, K. Lundström, J. Babol, K. Schütz, P. Jensen, and L. Andersson. 2006. Quantitative trait loci analysis of egg and meat production traits in a red junglefowl × White Leghorn cross. Anim. Genet. 37:529534.
  • Yeh, S. D., S. R. Liou, and J. R. True. 2006. Genetics of divergence in male wing pigmentation and courtship behavior between Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola. Heredity 96:383395.
  • Zuk, M., T. Kim, S. I. Robinson, and T. S. Johnsen. 1998. Parasites influence social rank and morphology, but not mate choice, in female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Anim. Behav. 56:493499.