SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Alonso, C., and C. M. Herrera. 2001. Neither vegetative nor reproductive advantages account for high frequency of male-steriles in southern Spanish gynodioecious Daphne laureola (Thymelaeceae). Am. J. Bot. 88:10161024.
  • Ashman, T.-L. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. J. Evol. Biol. 12:648661.
  • Ashman, T.-L. 2003. Constraints on the evolution of males and sexual dimorphism: field estimates of genetic architecture of reproductive traits in three populations of gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana. Evolution 57:20122025.
  • Ashman, T.-L. 2006. The evolution of separate sexes: a focus on the ecological context. Pp. 204222 in L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Asikainen, E., and P. Mutikainen. 2003. Female frequency and relative fitness of females and hermaphrodites in gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum (Geraniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90:226234.
  • Barr, C. M. 2004. Soil moisture and sex ratio in a plant with nuclear-cytoplasmic sex inheritance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:19351939.
  • Barrett, S. C. H. 1992. Gender variation and the evolution of dioecy in Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 5:423444.
  • Barrett, S. C. H., A. L. Case, and G. B. Peters. 1999. Gender modification and resource allocation in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). J. Ecol. 87:123137.
  • Campbell, D. R. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:227232.
  • Case, A. L., and T.-L. Ashman. 2007. An experimental test of the effects of resources and sex ratio on maternal fitness and phenotypic selection in gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana. Evolution 61:19001911.
  • Case, A. L., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2004. Environmental stress and the evolution of dioecy: Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceaea) in Western Australia. Evol. Ecol. 18:145164.
  • Charlesworth, D. 1999. Theories of the evolution of dioecy. Pp. 3360 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
  • Charlesworth, D. 2002. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88:94101.
  • Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112:975997.
  • Darwin, C. R. 1875. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. 2nd edn, Volume 2. John Murray, London , U.K .
  • Darwin, C. R. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London , U.K.
  • Delph, L. F. 1990a. Sex-ratio variation in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe strictissima (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 44:134142.
  • Delph, L. F. 1990b. Sex-differential resource allocation patterns in the subdioecious shrub Hebe sabalpina. Ecology 71:13421351.
  • Delph, L. F. 2003. Sexual dimorphism in gender plasticity and its consequences for breeding system evolution. Evol. Dev. 5:3439.
  • Delph, L. F., and D. G. Lloyd. 1991. Environmental and genetic control of gender in the dimorphic shrub Hebe subalpina. Evolution 45:19571964.
  • Delph, L. F., and S. B. Carroll. 2001. Factors affecting relative seed fitness and female frequency in a gynodioecious species, Silene acaulis. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:487505.
  • Delph, L. F., and D. E. Wolf. 2005. Evolutionary consequences of gender plasticity in genetically dimorhpic breeding systems. New Phytol. 166:119128.
  • Dorken, M. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2003. Life-history differentiation and the maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 57:19731988.
  • Dorken, M. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2004a. Chloroplast haplotype variation among monoecious and dioecious populations of Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae) in eastern North America. Mol. Ecol. 13:26992707.
  • Dorken, M. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2004b. Sex determination and the evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:213219.
  • Dorken, M. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2004c. Phenotypic plasticity of vegetative and reproductive traits in monoecious and dioecious populations of Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): a clonal aquatic plant. J. Ecol. 92:3244.
  • Dorken, M. E., J. Friedman, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 56:3141.
  • Klinkhamer, P. G. L., T. J. D. Jong, and H. Metz. 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:260265.
  • Kohn, J. R., and J. E. Biardi. 1995. Outcrossing rates and inferred levels of inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae). Heredity 75:7783.
  • Lewis, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol. 40:5663.
  • Lloyd, D. G. 1976. The transmission of genes via pollen and ovules in gynodioecious angiosperms. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9:199216.
  • Lloyd, D. G. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. Am. Nat. 120:571585.
  • Muenchow, G., and V. Delesalle. 1994. Pollinator response to male floral display size in two Sagittaria (Alismataceae) species. Am. J. Bot. 81:568573.
  • Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82:596606.
  • Sakai, A. K., and S. G. Weller. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. Pp. 132 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
  • Sakai, A. K., S. G. Weller, M.-L. Chen, S.-Y. Chou, and C. Tasanont. 1997. Evolution of gynodioecy and maintenance of females: the role of inbreeding depression, outcrossing rates, and resource allocation in Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 51:724736.
  • Sarkissian, T. S., S. C. H. Barrett, and L. D. Harder. 2001. Gender variation in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): is size all that matters? Ecology 82:360373.
  • Seger, J., and V. M. Eckhart. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:833841.
  • Schultz, S. T., and F. R. Ganders. 1996. Evolution of unisexuality in the Hawaiian flora: a test of microevolutionary theory. Evolution 50:842855.
  • Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. Freeman and Company, New York , NY .
  • Vaughton, G., and M. Ramsey. 2005. Dry environments promote the establishment of females in monomorphic populations of Wurmbea biglandulosa (Colchicaceae). Evol. Ecol. 18:323341.
  • Webb, C. J. 1999. Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. Pp. 6195 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
  • Weiblen, G. D., R. K. Oyama, and M. J. Donoghue. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in Monocotyledons. Am. Nat. 155:4658.
  • Wolfe, L. M., and A. Shmida. 1997. The ecology of sex expression in a gynodioecious Israeli desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus). Ecology 78:101110.
  • Wooten, J. W. 1971. The monoecious and dioecious conditions in Sagittaria latifolia L. (Alismataceae). Evolution 25:549553.
  • Yund, P. O. 1998. The effect of sperm competition on male gain curves in a colonial marine invertebrate. Ecology 79:328339.