SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Ackermann, R. R., and J. M. Cheverud. 2000. Phenotypic covariance structure in tamarins (genus Saguinus): a comparison of variation patterns using matrix correlation and common principal component analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 111:489501.
  • Albertson, R. C., J. T. Streelman, T. D. Kocher, and P. C. Yelick. 2005. Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: the molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:1628716292.
  • Armbruster, S. W., C. Pélabon, T. F. Hansen, and C. P. H. Mulder. 2004. Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. Pp. 2349 in M.Pigliucci and K.Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • Atchley, W. R., and B. K. Hall. 1991. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 66:101157.
  • Bastir, M., and A. Rosas. 2005. Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 128:2634.
  • Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1426214267.
  • Berg, R. L. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14:171180.
  • Björk, A. 1969. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am. J. Orthodont. 55:585599.
  • Björk, A., and V. Skieller. 1972. Facial development and tooth eruption: an implant study at the age of puberty. Am. J. Orthodont. 62:339383.
  • Bookstein, F. L. 1986. The elements of latent variable models: a cautionary lecture. Pp. 203229 in M. E.Lamb, A. L.Brown, and B.Rogoff, eds. Advances in developmental psychology, vol. 4. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale , NJ .
  • Bookstein, F. L.. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York .
  • Bookstein, F. L.. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1:225243.
  • Bookstein, F. L., A. P. Streissguth, P. D. Sampson, P. D. Connor, and H. M. Barr. 2002. Corpus callosum shape and neuropsychological deficits in adult males with heavy fetal alcohol exposure. Neuroimage 15:233251.
  • Boughner, J. C., and B. Hallgrímsson. 2008. Biological spacetime and the temporal integration of functional modules: a case study of dento-gnathic developmental timing. Dev. Dyn. 237:117.
  • Breuker, C. J., V. Debat, and C. P. Klingenberg. 2006. Functional evo-devo. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 21:488492.
  • Breuker, C. J., M. Gibbs, H. Van Dyck, P. M. Brakefiled, C. P. Klingenberg, and S. Van Dongen. 2007. Integration of wings and their eyespots in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308:454463.
  • Carleton, M. D. 1973. A survey of gross stomach morphology in new-world cricetinae rodentia muroidea with comments on functional interpretations. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 146:143.
  • Cheverud, J. M. 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36:499516.
  • Cheverud, J. M.. 2004. Modular pleiotropic effects of quantitative trait loci on morphological traits. Pp. 132153 in G.Schlosser and G. P.Wagner, eds. Modularity in development and evolution. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Cheverud, J. M., E. J. Routman, and D. J. Irschick. 1997. Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51:20062016.
  • Cowley, D. E., and W. R. Atchley. 1992. Quantitative genetic models for development, epigenetic selection, and phenotypic evolution. Evolution 46:495518.
  • Dietz, E. J. 1983. Permutation tests for association between two distance matrices. Syst. Zool. 32:2126.
  • Draghi, J., and G. R. Wagner. 2008. Evolution of evolvability in a developmental model. Evolution 62:301315.
  • Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, New York .
  • Ehrich, T. H., T. T. Vaughn, S. Koreishi, R. B. Linsey, L. S. Pletscher, and J. M. Cheverud. 2003. Pleiotropic effects on mandibular morphology I. Developmental morphological integration and differential dominance. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 296:5879.
  • Fornell, C., and F. L. Bookstein. 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Market. Res. 19:440452.
  • Guabloche, A., M. Arana, and O. E. Ramirez. 2002. Diet and gross gastric morphology of Oryzomys xantheolus (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia) in a Peruvian loma. Mammalia 66:405411.
  • Hall, B. K. 2003. Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular) units. Biol. Phil. 18:219247.
  • Hall, B. K., and T. Miyake. 2000. All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. Bioessays 22:138147.
  • Hallgrímsson, B., D. E. Lieberman, N. M. Young, T. Parsons, and S. Wat. 2007. Evolution of covariance in the mammalian skull. Novartis Found. Symp. 284:164190.
  • Hansen, T. F. 2006. The evolution of genetic architecture. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:123157.
  • Herring, S. W. 1993. Epigenetic and functional influences on skull growth. Pp. 153206 in J.Hanken and B. K.Hall, eds. The Skull, vol. 1: development. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Hershkovitz, P. 1944. A systematic review of the Neotropical water rats of the genus Nectomys (Cricetinae). Misc. Pub. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 58:1107.
  • Hine, E., and M. W. Blows. 2006. Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173:11351144.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., and H. Wold. 1982. The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects. Pp. 263270 in H.Wold and K.Jöreskog, eds. Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure, prediction, vol. I. North-Holland, Amsterdam .
  • Kaufman, M. H., and J. Bard. 1999. The anatomical basis of mouse development. Academic Press, San Diego .
  • Klingenberg, C. P. 1996. Multivariate allometry. Pp. 2349 in L. F.Marcus, M.Corti, A.Loy, G. J. P.Naylor, and D. E.Slice, eds. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York .
  • Klingenberg, C. P.. 2005. Developmental constraints, modules, and evolvability. Pp. 219247 in B.Hallgrímsson and B. K.Hall, eds. Variation: a central concept in biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam .
  • Klingenberg, C. P., and S. D. Zaklan. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54:12731285.
  • Klingenberg, C. P., and M. Zimmermann. 1992. Static, ontogenic, and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water-striders. Am. Nat. 140:601620.
  • Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, and J. M. Cheverud. 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166:19091921.
  • Klingenberg, C. P., K. Mebus, and J. C. Auffray. 2003. Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evol. Dev. 5:522531.
  • Krzanowski, W. J. 2000. Principles of multivariate analysis: a user's perspective. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • Leamy, L. J., E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud. 1999. Quantitative trait loci for early- and late-developing skull characters in mice: a test of the genetic independence model of morphological integration. Am. Nat. 153:201214.
  • Magwene, P. M. 2001. New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution 55:17341745.
  • Manly, B. F. J. 2006. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton , FL .
  • Márquez, E. J., and L. L. Knowles. 2007. Correlated evolution of multivariate traits: detecting co-divergence across multiple dimensions. J. Evol. Biol. 20:23342348.
  • Marroig, G., and J. M. Cheverud. 2001. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of new world monkeys. Evolution 55:25762600.
  • Marshall, L. G., S. D. Webb, J. J. Sepkoski, and D. M. Raup. 1982. Mammalian evolution and the great American interchange. Science 215:13511357.
  • Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2003. Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative? Genetics 165:411425.
  • Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:10271038.
  • Mezey, J. G., J. M. Cheverud, and G. P. Wagner. 2000. Is the genotype-phenotype map modular?: a statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156:305311.
  • Mitteroecker, P., and F. Bookstein. 2007. The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. Syst. Biol. 56:818836.
  • Mitteroecker, P., and F. Bookstein. 2008. The evolutionary role of modularity and integration in the hominoid cranium. Evolution 62:943958.
  • Monteiro, L. R., V. Bonato, and S. F. Dos Reis. 2005. Evolutionary integration and morphological diversification in complex morphological structures: mandible shape divergence in spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Evol. Dev. 7:429439.
  • Olson, E. C., and R. L. Miller. 1958. Morphological integration. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Orr, H. A. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54:1320.
  • Pavlicev, M., J. P. Kenney-Hunt, E. A. Norgard, C. C. Roseman, J. B. Wolf, and J. M. Cheverud. 2008. Genetic variation in pleiotropy: differential epistasis as a source of variation in the allometric relationship between long bone lengths and body weight. Evolution 62:199213.
  • Peres-Neto, P. R., and D. A. Jackson. 2001. How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129:169178.
  • Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:15061515.
  • Raff, R. 1996. The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Riedl, R. 1977. Systems-analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena. Q. Rev. Biol. 52:351370.
  • Richtsmeier, J. T., S. R. Lele, and T. M. Cole, III. 2005. Landmark morphometrics and the analysis of variation. Pp. 4969 in B.Hallgrímsson and B. K.Hall, eds. Variation: a central concept in biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam .
  • Rinker, G. C. 1954. The comparative myology of the mammalian genera Sigmodon, Oryzomys, Neotoma, and Peromyscus (Cricetinae), with remarks on their intergeneric relationships. Misc. Pub. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 83:1165.
  • Riska, B. 1986. Some models for development, growth, and morphometric correlation. Evolution 40:13031311.
  • Rohlf, F. J. 2006. TpsDig2 software, ver. 2.10. State Univ. New York, Stony Brook .
  • Rohlf, F. J., and D. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Biol. 39:4059.
  • Rohlf, F. J., and M. Corti. 2000. Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Syst. Biol. 49:740753.
  • Sheets, H. D. 2002a. Semiland6 software. Canisius College, Buffalo , NY .
  • Sheets, H. D.. 2002b. Standard6 software. Canisius College, Buffalo , NY .
  • Smith, K. K. 1993. The form of the feeding apparatus in terrestrial vertebrates: studies of adaptation and constraint. Pp. 150196 in J.Hanken and B. K.Hall, eds. The Skull, vol. 3: functional and evolutionary mechanisms. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Steppan, S. J. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure I. Contrasting results from matrix correlation and Common Principal Component Analyses. Evolution 51:571586.
  • Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:320327.
  • The MathWorks, Inc. 2006. Matlab R2006a software. Natick , MA.
  • Tokita, M., T. Kiyoshi, and K. N. Armstrong. 2007. Evolution of craniofacial novelty in parrots through developmental modularity and heterochrony. Evol. Dev. 9:590601.
  • Voss, R. S. 1988. Systematics and ecology of Ichthyomyine rodents (Muroidea): patterns of morphological evolution in a small adaptive radiation. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 188:259493.
  • Wagner, G. P. 1984. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. J. Math. Biol. 21:7795.
  • Wagner, G. P.. 1988. The influence of variation and of developmental constraints on the rate of multivariate phenotypic evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 1:4566.
  • Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967976.
  • Wagner, G. P., and J. G. Mezey. 2004. The role of genetic architecture constraints in the origin of variational modularity. Pp. 338358 in G.Schlosser and G. P.Wagner, eds. Modularity in development and evolution. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Wagner, G. P., M. Pavlicev, and J. M. Cheverud. 2007. The road to modularity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:921931.
  • Walker, J. A. 2000. Ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known covariance matrix. Syst. Biol. 49:686696.
  • Weksler, M. 2003. Phylogeny of Neotropical oryzomyine rodents (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) based on the nuclear IRBP exon. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 29:331349.
  • Weksler, M.. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of oryzomine rodents (Muroidea: Sigmodontinae): separate and combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 296:1149.
  • Wold, H. 1966. Nonlinear estimation by iterative least square procedures. Pp. 411444 in F. N.David, ed. Research papers in statistics. Wiley, New York .
  • Wright, S. 1932. General, group and special size factors. Genetics 17:06030619.
  • Young, R. L., and A. V. Badyaev. 2006. Evolutionary persistence of phenotypic integration: influence of developmental and functional relationships on complex trait evolution. Evolution 60:12911299.
  • Zelditch, M. L., and A. C. Carmichael. 1989. Ontogenetic variation in patterns of developmental and functional integration in skulls of Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution 43:814824.
  • Zelditch, M. L., J. Mezey, H. D. Sheets, B. L. Lundrigan, and T. Garland. 2006. Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance. Evol. Dev. 8:4660.
  • Zelditch, M. L., D. O. Straney, D. L. Swiderski, and A. C. Carmichael. 1990. Variation in developmental constraints in Sigmodon. Evolution 44:17381747.